ARTICLE
16 November 2017

Civil Procedure - Bloomsbury Law Solicitor v Macpherson

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
Deferring the date from which interest at the judgment rate runs.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Case Alert - [2017] EWHC 2708 (QB)



Deferring the date from which interest at the judgment rate runs

The standard position is that the 8% interest rate on judgment debts starts to run from the date a judgment is given. However, the court has a discretion to order a different date from when this interest will run (CPR r40.8). So, for example, it was held in Involnert Management v Aprilgrange that it is not just to make an order under which interest begins to run before the paying party could reasonably be expected to pay the debt. It was also held in that case that there is no requirement that the case have unusual features in order to justify a later start date.

In this case, it was held that the Master had not erred in ordering a later starting date (of some 3 months) which corresponded to the date on which the paying party had learnt what the other party was claiming in respect of costs.

The payee had referred to the Court of Appeal decision of Bim Kemi v Blackburn Chemicals [2003], in which it was held that interest should run from the date of the original costs order (where an appeal had been handed down later on). That case was distinguished here on the following basis: "Whereas in Bim Kemi the receiving party was a commercial enterprise which had borrowed externally to fund the litigation, the claimant in this case was a solicitor conducting the litigation on his own, and not borrowing or spending money to do so. In those circumstances, the award of interest at a commercial rate is a reasonable exercise of discretion, so far as the period before delivery of the bills is concerned".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More