UK: Anti-Suit Injunctions

Last Updated: 12 August 2008

West Tankers Inc v. RAS Riunione (the "Front Comor")

This is reported at [2007] All ER (Comm). Whether the principle in Turner v. Grovit (see Issues 5-7) applied to arbitration clauses has been the subject of much divided opinion. The House of Lords considered this question to be of practical importance and used the decision to refer to the European Court the following question:-

"Is it consistent with EC Reg.44/2001 for a court of a Member State to make an order to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings in another Member State on the grounds that such proceedings are in breach of an arbitration agreement?"

It is clear from the views of all members of the House of Lords that they considered the answer should be an affirmative one.

The House of Lords agreed with the views of the court of first instance on two issues. First, granting such an injunction was not inconsistent with the New York Convention. Second, the English court should not exercise its discretion to refuse to restrain proceedings in another member state.

We await the European Court's decision.

Starlight Shipping Co and Another v. Tai Ping Insurance Co Limited

This is reported at [2007] All ER (D) p.8. In Issue 8 we considered the decision in Cetelem v. Roust Holdings and the jurisdiction under s.44 of the 1996 Act to grant injunctive relief in aid of the arbitration process. That left over the relationship of s.37 of the SCA with s.44. We looked at this briefly in Elektrim v. Vivendi (No2).


The First and Second Claimants were respective Owner and Manager of a vessel chartered to T. The charter included an English law and arbitration clause. T subchartered the vessel to the Second Defendant on identical terms as to law and arbitration. A bill of lading was issued and the Second Defendants became a party to the bill of lading contract. The bill of lading incorporated the arbitration clause from the charter. The arbitration was to comprise three persons being members of the London Maritime Arbitrators Association ("LMAA"). During the voyage, the vessel and cargo were lost.

In March 2007 the First Defendant (being the insurers of the Second Defendant) obtained a "Civil Award" from the Wuhan Maritime Court in China against the First Claimant and T. In June 2007 the First and Second Claimants objected to the jurisdiction of the Wuhan Maritime Court on the grounds of the arbitration clause, but the evidence when such an objection would be heard by the Wuhan Maritime Court was unsatisfactory. Also, there was evidence of a tendency of the Chinese maritime courts to declare arbitration clauses to be invalid. There was also no requirement for the Wuhan Maritime Court to hear the issue and it was felt a hearing to be unlikely.

The First Claimants applied for an anti-suit injunction against both First and Second Defendants. The First and Second Defendants were bound by the arbitration clause and ordinarily the English court will exercise a discretion to restrain the foreign proceedings unless there was a strong reason for continuing those proceedings. The issue was whether there was some strong reason not to do so. The court also assessed the relationship between s.37 of the SCA and s.44 of the 1996 Act.

S.37 of the SCA and s.44 of the 1996 Act

S.37 gives the court jurisdiction to grant an anti-suit injunction and anti-arbitration injunction, but could it also exercise that power under s.44? The powers under s.44 are much narrower than s.37. A tension existed, but could the two be reconciled?

S.44 of the 1996 Act

The following points were made.

  • In this case the tribunal had no power to grant an interim injunction, but only a final injunction in the form of a final award.
  • Under s.44 the court can grant an interim injunction "if the case is one of urgency" and "for the purpose of preserving the assets". An asset would be a contractual right including the right to have disputes referred to arbitration.
  • Was this case urgent? Although the First Claimant considered it urgent, it sought the permission from the tribunal to make the application (permission of the tribunal is a pre-condition to a court application under s.44 in non-urgent cases). This was declined.
  • However, where s.44 applies, the court can grant an injunction if the tribunal does not have the power or is unable to do so effectively. Therefore, could the tribunal have made a final award against the Defendants in time to restrain them from pursuing the Chinese proceedings before any decision of the Wuhan Maritime Court was issued?
  • Provided a third arbitrator could be appointed and a decision made, the tribunal could have acted effectively within the meaning of s.44 even if the award was "ineffective" in the particular jurisdiction, because the courts refused to recognise it.
  • If the tribunal could have acted effectively, could they have done so within the timescale? On the evidence it could not. Some of the tribunal members were unavailable within the timescale and since they cannot act "effectively" within s.44, the requirements of s.44(5) are met to entitle the court to exercise its jurisdiction under s.44. Provided other discretionary requirements are satisfied and there is no strong reason not to make an interim order, an order was made under s.44 to cover the position until such time as the tribunal can itself determine the matter and make a final award relating to the restraining order.


The factors taken into account in the exercise of s.44 do not apply to s.37. Since the proceedings were undertaken in breach of the arbitration clause, an order under s.37 would have been available. S.37 gave the court power to make the order and there was no strong reason against making it.

The order made went no further than under s.44, but the court failed to address the issue under s.1 of the 1996 Act that; " matters governed by this Part the Court should not intervene except as provided by this Part.." Therefore, whilst the court does have the power under s.37, since the 1996 Act that power was to be exercised cautiously and with regard to principles upon which the 1996 Act was expressly based, particularly respect for party autonomy and s.1 of the 1996 Act.

C v D

This is reported at [2007] EWCH 1541. An anti-suit injunction was granted by the English Court restraining a party from challenging before the New York court a Partial Award made in an English arbitration. The party alleged that the Partial Award was in disregard of New York law and in breach of the New York Convention. Both parties had participated in the arbitration. The contract was subject to New York law, contained a London arbitration clause and referred to the 1996 Act. The English court held that irrespective of the proper law of the contract (New York law), by agreeing to London as the seat of the arbitration and the curial law being English law, the party had agreed to limit its challenge to the award only through the 1996 Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions