UK: FOS: Court Of Appeal Decisions

Last Updated: 2 July 2008
Article by Simon Morris and Sarah Redlich

Recent Court of Appeal Judicial Review and Appeal decisions confirm FOS procedures are lawful and reasonable

Introduction

The Court of Appeal has recently confirmed in Judicial Review Proceedings before it that the Financial Ombudsman Service ("FOS") fair and reasonable jurisdiction does not require it to follow the law, nor is it obliged to hold a hearing or, as a matter of course, make its decisions public. In an Appeal before the same Court, the Court of Appeal has also held that FOS's case fee system is both lawful and reasonable, it is able to delegate certain aspects of its decision-making process, and that while it must consider the dismissal grounds provided under its procedural rules it has discretion not to apply these in certain circumstances. Overall, the decisions maintain current FOS practice and endorse earlier cases considered by the Courts.

To view the article in full, please see below:




Full Article

Recent Court of Appeal Judicial Review and Appeal decisions confirm FOS procedures are lawful and reasonable

Introduction

The Court of Appeal has recently confirmed in Judicial Review Proceedings before it that the Financial Ombudsman Service ("FOS") fair and reasonable jurisdiction does not require it to follow the law, nor is it obliged to hold a hearing or, as a matter of course, make its decisions public. In an Appeal before the same Court, the Court of Appeal has also held that FOS's case fee system is both lawful and reasonable, it is able to delegate certain aspects of its decision-making process, and that while it must consider the dismissal grounds provided under its procedural rules it has discretion not to apply these in certain circumstances. Overall, the decisions maintain current FOS practice and endorse earlier cases considered by the Courts.

Background

1.The Judicial Review proceedings

An IFA, Heather Moor and Edgecomb ("HME"), brought Judicial Review proceedings in respect of a particular complaint and FOS's decision to uphold that complaint and its award for redress, which amounted to more than the statutory cap of £100,000. HME challenged FOS's decision and award on the basis that:

(i) FOS was required to determine complaints in accordance with English law – this was intended so as not to infringe Articles 1 and 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights ("ECHR");

(ii) In this case, FOS had failed to apply English law and, therefore, its decision was irrational and should be quashed;

(iii) Furthermore, the Ombudsman should have held an oral hearing in public and given his decision in public, but wrongly refused to do either.

2. The Appeal case

The FOS brought proceedings against the same IFA to reclaim unpaid case fees in respect of four mortgage endowment complaints which it had investigated but ultimately dismissed. These proceedings were heard at the same time as the Judicial Review proceedings.

HME defended the proceedings on the basis of a number of arguments:

(i) In these cases, FOS did not consider the grounds for dismissal set out in its procedural rules;

(ii) Alternatively, to the extent dismissal was considered in these cases, this decision was delegated, which is not permitted under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 ("FSMA") and, therefore, is unlawful;

(iii) FOS has a policy of always investigating mortgage endowment complaints (as a opposed to dismissing them when appropriate), which is unlawful and ultra vires;

(iv) If there had been lawful consideration of the dismissal grounds, the cases would have been dismissed, they would not have become chargeable cases, and the case fees would not have become payable.

At first instance, District Judge Rutherford rejected the contention that FOS has a "policy" not to reject mortgage endowment complaints and was not persuaded that any of the complaints should have been dismissed - given the lack of evidence to determine this either way - but he found for HME on the basis that:

(i) The case fee system is unfair and unreasonable for a number of reasons including that (a) it is unjust that a case fee is charged where cases are investigated and then ultimately dismissed; (b) FOS already receives revenue through an industry-wide levy; (c) the case fees are supposed to only provide 50% of FOS's funding but, in light of the numbers of mortgage endowment complaints, this proportion has been significantly exceeded; and (c) no other professional body charges fees to "innocent" respondents;

(ii) FOS had no power to delegate, from an Ombudsman, the decision as to whether or not to dismiss a complaint (although he said the decision would not have been different if it had not been delegated).

The Court of Appeal decisions

1. The Judicial Review proceedings

The Court of Appeal rejected HME's application, holding that:

(i) While FOS must take account of the law, its fair and reasonable jurisdiction does not require it to follow the law. If the Ombudsman believes a fair and reasonable outcome differs from English law, he is able to make an award on that basis provided it is reasonable in all the circumstances. The decision of R (IFG Financial Service Ltd) v Financial Ombudsman Service [2005] EWHC 1153 (Admin) confirmed;

(ii) FOS had, in this case, done just that; taking account of the common law duty of care and the reasonable standard expected of a reasonable IFA and actually following the law in reaching the view that HME had acted negligently;

(iii) FOS is not under an obligation to hold an oral hearing, provided the Ombudsman considers the need for one; this was done in this case, the Ombudsman correctly concluding that the written evidence carried greater weight than the oral evidence;

Furthermore, the Court considered the need for the hearing to be held in public and confirmed that the right to a public hearing needed to be considered in the context of the whole procedural process, including Judicial Review. The right to apply for Judicial Review, which would provide a public hearing, met this requirement;

(iv) In relation to the contention that the Ombudsman should provide his decision in public, in this case it had, in fact, been done by way of the Judicial Review proceedings. However, in general, in order to comply with Article 6 of the ECHR, decisions or judgements do not, as a matter of course, need to be made public – the Court has flexibility to decide whether this is necessary in the circumstances.

2. The Appeal case

The Court of Appeal reversed District Judge Rutherford's decision finding for FOS and confirming:

(i) The case fee process is lawful and reasonable, principally on the basis that it is not linked to the outcome of the case and, therefore, preserves the Ombudsman's independence and neutrality. The Court said it was a rational response to the need to fund FOS;

(ii) That while, in these cases, it was not clear from the evidence whether dismissal had been considered, if a complaint is thereafter investigated but then rejected, the case fee is properly payable;

(iii) That while FOS is under an obligation to consider the dismissal grounds, it has discretion not to dismiss the complaint even if one or more grounds apply if the Ombudsman considers there is a reasonable possibility that investigation will indicate the complaint is well-founded;

(iv) That FOS may lawfully delegate the exercise of the power to dismiss to a suitably qualified member of staff; while FSMA deliberately excludes the "determination" of a complaint from FOS's delegation powers, it includes "dismissal".

Potential impact/effects of the Court of Appeal's decisions

1. The Judicial Review proceedings have confirmed the operation of FOS's fair and reasonable jurisdiction and its obligation to consider hearing – principles that some of the industry have considered established for some time. In light of this, it seems unlikely that further such challenges will be made in the near future;

2. The Court of Appeal's view that the case fee process is lawful and reasonable makes the likelihood of any change to it more remote. This may mean that firms' recent moves to seek change in the form of non-payment for complaints rejected on the basis of FOS's jurisdiction may be more difficult or not succeed, although the recent Hunt Review of FOS has recommended that the waiver of case fees for complaints outside FOS's jurisdiction is considered;

3. The Judicial Review proceedings has effectively bolstered FOS's practice of adapting to the fluctuating nature and volume of complaints by swelling its lower ranks to carry out the jurisdiction and dismissal reviews of complaints prior to investigation. This must be the appropriate and cost-effective way to run the Scheme for the benefit and in the interests of all its stakeholders but it may mean challenges in relation to the quality of FOS decisions or procedural irregularity may continue;

4. Overall, these cases emphasise once again how important it is for FOS to be able to show its decisions are reasonable and demonstrate its procedure is followed impeccably. It is quite clear from these cases that there are the resources and increasing confidence to bring challenges, whatever their chances of success, if firms and/or complainants believe there is a case to answer.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 30/06/2008.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions