UK: Contempt: The Perils Of Legal Discovery

Last Updated: 31 August 2017
Article by Paul Harris

A recent action for trademarks and competition illustrates the risks around contempt proceedings and proper use of disclosure.

The convoluted case of Grosvenor Chemicals Ltd and Ors v UPL Europe Ltd and Ors involved three sets of parties.

First, the UPL parties, who were the claimants in the pre-existing main claim, but defendants in the contempt proceedings; second, the ACA parties, defendants only in the main claim who played no part in the contempt proceedings; and lastly the C&W parties, who were the claimants in the contempt proceedings, joined defendants in the main claim.

Restricted use

In an action for trademark infringement and effectively unfair competition (the ‘main claim’) against the ACA parties, the UPL parties sought a pre-action disclosure order against a potential new defendant, the C&W parties, who were later joined.

That disclosure order contained a specific undertaking from the UPL parties that any discovery documents located could only be used ‘for the purposes of these proceedings (including adding further respondents) or commencing civil proceedings in relation to the same or related subject matter to these proceedings or obtaining evidence’.

A subsequent consent order agreed between the parties omitted these restrictions. However, Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) r31.22 contains a specific restriction that disclosure of any document in proceedings may only be used for the purposes of the proceedings for which it was disclosed.

This puts into effect procedurally the ‘implied undertaking’ given by solicitors to the court not to use discovery documents for any ‘collateral purpose’.

“According to the UPL parties’ solicitors, the email was proof that the C&W parties were selling counterfeit product”

For many months following disclosure by the C&W parties, the solicitors acting for the UPL parties failed to realise the significance of the contents of some of the documents disclosed – or so they say.

One email passing between the C&W parties made reference to an ex-UPL employee, who was aware of the UPL parties’ agrichemical formulation and who appeared to have told the C&W parties about a specific formulation.

This is because the email stated: ‘We [and the ex-employee] went through our formulation and we have been selling it as a direct match.’

According to the UPL parties’ solicitors, the email was proof that the C&W parties were selling counterfeit product and the ex-employee had divulged confidential information about the formulation of their product.

The UPL parties’ solicitors wrote letters to the C&W parties, and to the ex-employee threatening him with ‘new’ proceedings. At the time (late November) there were only a few months left until the April trial date in the main claim. As those letters formed the basis of the application for permission to bring contempt proceedings, the judge considered them carefully.

Letters of the law

First, as is often the case, the solicitors made various accusations about the status of the ex-employee, his knowledge and what it was that the UPL parties also knew, or should have known.

Next, the solicitors required various information and disclosure, including the chemical formula of the alleged infringing product, which they claimed was counterfeit. The solicitors’ letter contended that further applications for specific disclosure would be made and ended by reserving all their client’s rights.

The letter to the ex-employee was similarly forthright and required them to divulge certain information. Unfortunately for the solicitors, the letter concluded with threats about bringing proceedings, stating the ex-employee should seek independent legal advice, but making clear proceedings would be issued against him – but not that he would be joined in the existing proceedings.

This showed the disclosure of the documents in the main claim was being used for the possibility of bringing new proceedings against the ex-employee for breach of confidence, a cause of action not in the main claim.

“Unfortunately for the solicitors, the letter concluded with threats about bringing proceedings”

The C&W parties’ solicitors wrote back robustly, pointing out such use was a breach of CPR r31.22. Accordingly, as there were no grounds, UPL parties’ solicitors were required to notify the ex-employee as such – in the absence of any court order granting permission for such use.

The response from the UPL parties’ solicitors was to provide amended pleadings to the main claim, adding the cause of action and also adding the ex-employee to the proceedings. The UPL parties’ solicitor’s letter also pointed out that it was not ‘collateral use’ to seek to add a new cause of action.

However, they acknowledged that if the court considered that separate proceedings were required, then they would need the court’s permission to use the documents. To avoid this, the solicitors sought agreement to what they were seeking to achieve and considered there would be no ‘prejudice’ in preparation of this part of the claim – despite there being less than three months until the trial.

Increasingly heated correspondence then ensued between the lawyers and only then did the UPL parties’ solicitors see that an apology might be warranted to quell the growing threat of contempt proceedings.

Needless to say, that apology was considered to be too little, too late and the proceedings were launched – with the UPL parties seeking permission to use the documents, if this was needed.

Beneath contempt

Perhaps unnecessarily, the C&W parties’ solicitors made two pointed barbs in respect of the UPL parties’ solicitors’ belated apology, saying:

‘These are all crocodile tears expressed now it is apparent that the correspondence will be put before the court because the 10 January letter has not done the trick. I therefore dismiss the 26 January letter as a mere exercise in hypocrisy.’

Similarly, in respect of the late-seeking of the court’s permission to use the documents, they commented it was ‘surely like putting the money back in the till after one has been caught with one’s hand in it’.

Against that backdrop, the judge considered the approach to be taken as to whether to give permission to commit a party for contempt. First, there must be a deliberate or reckless breach of CPR r31.22, in other words knowing the disclosed documents are subject to it, but ignoring that fact.

Second, this must be proved beyond reasonable doubt by the party seeking committal.

The court also had to consider whether it was in the public interest to order committal proceedings because important lessons will be learned, as well as the relative strengths of the case.

“The late-seeking of the court’s permission to use the documents, they commented it was ‘surely like putting the money back in the till after one has been caught with one’s hand in it’”

The judge pointed out it was often the case after disclosure that an additional cause of action would be sought to be added, or an additional party joined in. But as ‘new proceedings’ had been threatened against the ex-employee, use of the disclosed documents was a breach of CPR r31.22, even though the letter to the C&W parties was not.

The judge concluded that the UPL parties’ solicitor’s breach was not deliberate, because the partner’s evidence showed he truly believed the use fell within the ambit of CPR r31.22. There was also no public interest in allowing contempt proceedings in this case. The application was therefore dismissed.

No clear winner

The most likely satisfied party with the outcome, despite seemingly losing, is the C&W parties. The reason is that their tactic meant that the trial in the main claim took place without the confidential information claim being heard.

It is true that the UPL parties did not want this added as it stood at the time, but it will have robbed them of the chance to have the ex-employee in the witness box.

If, as they would have expected, he was shown to be a ‘bad egg’, that smell would have tainted the C&W parties’ defence in the main claim and meant success for the UPL parties. Having this put off, therefore, benefitted the C&W parties the most.

The case highlights the importance of disclosure, but equally that a parties’ openness on disclosure should not be abused, and without the court’s express permission the documents should not be used for other purposes.

Equally, it shows the dilemma sometimes faced by judges to do justice to a situation. Here, the judge considered the UPL parties’ solicitor’s position only from the angle of whether his action was deliberate.

Given the test refers to ‘reckless’, the judge also should have considered that. The question the judge should have asked, given the lawyer was aware of a risk of falling foul of CPR r31.22, was whether in the circumstances known it was unreasonable to take the risk. That answer is less clear.

Paul Harris is a partner at Venner Shipley

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.