UK: Software Patents: The More Things Change ...

Last Updated: 23 May 2008
Article by Ralph Cox

As noted in our Winter 2007 Update, the Court of Appeal reviewed the law in the UK on the patentability of computer programs in the Aerotel case1 and laid down a 4 step test for use in deciding whether a given software invention is patentable or not. The UK IPO changed its practice to follow that judgment but 4 recent decisions of the High Court show that it has been over-zealous in rejecting software patents. In response, the IPO has announced a partial change in practice to allow claims to programs stored on suitable media.

Article 52 of the European Patent Convention excludes computer programs per se from being patentable. Prior to Aerotel a number of different tests or approaches to determining the application and scope of this exclusion had developed in UK case law, with several more being used by the EPO. The Aerotel decision therefore brought the UK case law back into line with earlier Court of Appeal authority which required a program to provide a technical contribution to the known art in order to be patentable. Somewhat ironically given subsequent developments, Aerotel also approved a 4-step test proposed by the UK IPO for determining whether a technical contribution was present. The test is to:-

  1. properly construe the claim;

  2. identify the actual contribution;

  3. ask whether it falls solely within the excluded subject matter; and

  4. check whether the actual or alleged contribution is actually technical in nature.

Programs on media

The issue left open by Aerotel is whether patent claims to computer programs (or, more precisely, claims to programs on suitable storage media or carriers) are allowable. The EPO considers they are allowable if the program has the potential, when run on a computer, to bring about a technical effect beyond the normal physical interactions between the program and the computer. The UK IPO had taken the opposite view. The issue came to be decided by the UK's High Court in the case of Astron Clinica2 which concerned 6 patent applications only partially allowed by the UK IPO. The method and apparatus claims in these applications - effectively claims to methods performed by running a suitably programmed computer and claims to a computer programmed to carry out the method respectively - had been allowed as the programs did provide a technical contribution. Given that, it is difficult to see the logic behind the UK IPO then rejecting claims to the programs themselves but it did so relying on Article 52 interpreted in light of Aerotel. The applicants appealed the decision.

There was a practical reason behind the appeal: the inventions would be exploited by selling the programs on a carrier such as CD-ROM or by download over the Internet rather than being preloaded on PCs. Competitors would do the same. Therefore without claims covering programs the protection afforded against infringements in the UK would be limited to contributory infringement (which, unlike direct infringement, is not strict liability) and there would be no protection against the production and sale of programs intended for use abroad.

Reviewing the Aerotel decision, the High Court could not detect any reasoning suggesting that all computer programs were necessarily excluded by Article 52. The substance rather than the form of the matter should be looked at and so it should make no difference in applying Aerotel's 4 step test whether the invention is claimed in the form of a programmed computer, a method involving that computer's use or the program itself. Further, it was highly undesirable for Article 52 to be construed differently by the UK IPO and the EPO.

The applications were therefore remitted to the UK IPO for further consideration. The UK IPO also issued a new Practice Notice3 implementing the change of approach to allow claims to programs on carriers but stating that in other respects its Practice Notice issued after Aerotel remains in effect4.

Application of the 4-step test

As indicated above, Astron-Medica is not the only recent decision that has over-turned the UK IPO's decisions on software patents. A second decision is that in Symbian5. Symbian's invention related to a method of accessing data in a computing device so as to avoid malfunctions in the dynamic link library (the collection of programs or files called up as required by an executable program running on a computer at any given time). Applying the 4 step test, the UK IPO decided that the claims were to a computer program as such, provided no technical contribution and so were excluded from patentability under Article 52. In a parallel application before it, the EPO decided that the claims were allowable. Symbian appealed the UK IPO's decision to the High Court.

The main issue was whether, in applying the 4 step test, the UK IPO could ignore the check under limb 4 if the answer to the question in 3 was "yes", i.e. the alleged contribution of the invention was entirely within excluded subject matter. The High Court decided it was wrong to do so. The two limbs were inseparable parts of the same question. On the facts it also considered the UK IPO was wrong to regard an improved interface with the DLL provided by the program as not having a relevant technical effect. The invention addressed a technical shortcoming and was not limited to the processing of data only. Symbian's appeal was therefore allowed. This time the UK IPO has not accepted it was wrong but indicated it would appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Business methods

As well as excluding computer programs per se, Article 52 excludes business methods. Often the 2 exclusions fall to be considered together. Such a case was IGT/Acres Gaming6. IGT sought patent protection for its idea of using conventional cards (e.g. credit cards, driving licences) in casinos to access a player's account, rather than going to the trouble of running a loyalty card system. The novel aspect of the invention was said to be doing this without needing to decrypt the information on the conventional card. The UK IPO applied Aerotel's 4 step test and held that the invention was excluded from patent protection as it was no more than a method of doing business.

The High Court disagreed. If the concept of using cards in this way without decryption was new and not obvious, it would be so irrespective of the business in which it was used. The concept could be stated without any reference to any business method as such. It could not therefore be said to be within the exclusion. The application's claims directed to computer programs were not within the software exclusion either (following Astron Clinica). However, the High Court considered that the claims were not sufficiently clear as to what was meant by "encrypted" information and "without decrypting" it. The High Court therefore gave IGT the choice of applying to amend or appealing its decision to the Court of Appeal.

Mental acts

The fourth case, Kapur7, concerned 5 patent applications relating in one way or another to document management systems which were rejected by the UK IPO as being to computer programs as such or, if not, to methods of performing mental acts - a further exclusion from patentability under Article 52. Mr Kapur appealed to the High Court. For efficiency, the High Court considered one application only which related to a method of storing data from deleted files, which would otherwise be lost, in a separate file store so that it could be made available again if the computer user wanted.

On the computer program exclusion, the High Court noted that the mere fact that the invention as claimed could be implemented manually as well as on a computer did not prevent it from being to a computer program as such. Here, even though the invention improved the way in which data is handled there was no technical effect beyond a program running on a computer. The invention was therefore excluded from patentability.

Regarding the mental act exclusion, the High Court reviewed the authorities, including Aerotel, and concluded that a narrow interpretation should be followed such that "provided the claim cannot be infringed by mental acts as such, its subject matter is not caught by the exclusion". Non-mental elements in a claim would therefore take the invention outside it. The judge admitted to "a feeling of some unreality" with this aspect of the case as it was far from clear that Mr Kapur had really intended to cover non-computer implementations. Nonetheless, the UK IPO had incorrectly ignored the non-mental elements in its analysis and therefore the case was remitted for further consideration.

Comment

The Astron Clinica decision is a welcome one for software designers as it has brought the UK IPO's approach on claims for programs on carriers into line with the more flexible approach in the EPO. The decisions as a whole also show that the courts are prepared to take a more holistic approach than the UK IPO to inventions in the software field and how they relate to the various exclusions from patentability under Article 52. Pending any further appeal in the Symbian case, the UK IPO should follow suit. However, as illustrated by Kapur, the EPO will generally remain the better forum for obtaining software patents while the "technical contribution" requirement remains good law in the UK. In contrast, current EPO jurisprudence8 allows any claim which involves the use of or is to a piece of hardware however mundane to bypass the Article 52 exclusion and move on to an assessment of inventive step.

Footnotes

1 Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd & others and Macrossan's Patent Application [2007] RPC 7

2 Astron Clinica Ltd & Ors' Applications [2008] EWHC 85 (Pat)

3 7 February 2008: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/patent/p-decisionmaking/p-law/p-law-notice/p-law-notice-subjectmatter-20080207.htm

4 2 November 2006: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/patent/p-decisionmaking/p-law/p-law-notice/p-law-notice-subjectmatter.htm

5 Symbian Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents [2008] EWHC 518 (Pat)

6 IGT/Acres Gaming v Comptroller-General of Patents [2008] EWHC 568 (Pat)

7 Kapur v Comptroller-General of Patents [2008] EWHC 649 (Pat)

8 Hitachi/Auction Method (2004) T258/03 and Microsoft/Data Transfer (2006) T424/03

www.fasken.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.