European Union: Streamlining Of EPO Procedure

Last Updated: 5 July 2017
Article by Simon Haslam

The European Patent Office (EPO) is making significant inroads into its notorious patent examination and opposition backlogs. This has brought its own issues, but applicants can still obtain the patent protection they deserve.


The patent prosecution process at the EPO has traditionally been relatively slow. Some applications would not be searched and examined for several years and it was not unusual for responses to examination reports (Office Actions) to go unexamined for a year or more. Three or four examination reports would be issued before proceedings were brought to a head, either by allowance of the application or by being called to Oral Proceedings (a hearing). Post-grant opposition proceedings were also very slow and could take many years. Such delays led to uncertainty for all parties involved.

Recent developments – overview

The EPO has taken many positive steps to reduce its patent prosecution backlog, and granted patents are now being obtained more quickly. The EPO is doing this by taking positive steps during the search, examination and opposition stages. The EPO wants to bring prosecution to a conclusion as soon as possible, concentrating on what the applicant, and sometimes the EPO itself, perceives as being the invention. The EPO is becoming far less tolerant of what some may describe as "fishing expeditions" in which applicants make a series of minor claim amendments and/or arguments when responding to Office Actions to see what protection can be obtained. We discuss below our experience of recent EPO practice and actions that the applicant can take to obtain the patent protection they deserve.

Search practice

The EPO typically performs one thorough search of all the claims it thinks relates to the first-listed invention in a set of claims. The EPO search is directed to a single invention, and if the EPO thinks that the claim set relates to more than one invention, the second and further inventions will not be searched without payment of further search fees. In this connection, the EPO has, particularly when acting as International Search Authority, developed a nasty habit of raising a posteriori non-unity objections, in which the claims are deemed to lack unity when taking the prior art into consideration. In those cases, the EPO will only search the first listed invention without the payment of further search fees. Therefore, the order in which subject matter is presented in the claims (both independent and dependent) is important. Preferred dependent claims should be high-up the list of dependent claims to maximise the chance of those claims being searched without having to pay extra search fees. If an independent claim has a feature that may be chosen from a list of options (e.g. in a Markush listing), then we recommend that the preferred options are placed first in the list (even though such lists are traditionally written in alphabetical order e.g. –NH-, - O-, -S-). If you have an ex-PCT European application and you know that claim 1 lacks novelty, consider amending the claims before the EPO performs the European search.

As of 1st April 2017, if the EPO finds during a search that there is non-unity, then the EPO will issue a preliminary (non-binding) patentability opinion and will invite the applicant to pay further search fees. This new practice is consistent with the EPO's drive to progress prosecution and to conclude matters as soon as practicable. The EPO now issues a Search Opinion with its Search Report, the Search Opinion being a reasoned statement relating to patentability. This effectively provides the applicant with an extra Office Action, and it is sensible to use this Office Action wisely.

Examination practice

Unlike the US, it is not possible to continue examination by filing a Request for Continued Examination. Applicants should no longer rely on receiving three or four examination reports as part of the examination proceedings before allowance or call to Oral Proceedings. We are seeing more instances of applications being called to Oral Proceedings after only one examination report, and new prior art being cited in Office Actions, with a threat of a Summons to Oral Proceedings if all objections based on the new prior art are not overcome. We have even had one case in which an Office Action was issued, proposing a date for Oral Proceedings in the event that the objections raised in the Office Action were not overcome.

It is therefore becoming far more difficult to "string out" the examination process before making substantive amendments to the claims.

Examiners are suggesting possible amendments to claims, which can be helpful, but we have also seen cases in which Examiners have made amendments to the claims unilaterally without seeking the approval of the applicant.

There are several ways in which we can obtain allowance for desirable subject matter and reduce the risk of being called to Oral Proceedings. Applicants should use all opportunities to argue their case and/or amend their claims in a productive manner. Applicants should use the Search Opinion sensibly, making amendments to the claims if appropriate. If your patentability arguments in relation to claim 1 are not strong, then you may wish to consider making patentability arguments in relation to certain preferred dependent claims, giving the examiner a strong clue as to the preferred dependent claims and also making it easier for the Examiner to issue a further Office Action indicating that the dependent claim is allowable.

A further option is to file more than one set of claims for the EPO to consider (filing of multiple "requests"). Historically, some applicants have been reluctant to do this because of a perception that the EPO would only allow the narrowest set of claims. This is not something we have recently experienced.

The EPO is encouraging applicants to consider whether or not to continue with applications by offering a full refund of the examination fee if an application is withdrawn before the start of examination and by offering a 50% refund of the examination fee if an application is withdrawn before the end of the (unextended) deadline for responding to the first Examination Report.

Allowance practice

When the EPO thinks that an application is in order for grant, it issues an allowance communication, accompanied by the text of the application which is allowed. Examiners are being encouraged to get applications to grant quickly, but this has given rise to some practices which are less than satisfactory.

We are seeing cases in which the EPO is making amendments unilaterally without agreement from the applicant and allowing the application based on that amendment. In some cases, the amendment made by the Examiner is acceptable, but some amendments raise problems. For example, we have seen some amendments which arguably add matter and therefore should not be allowed, and may not be correctable post-grant. In this instance, we recommend that the text be disapproved, if possible replacing the "offending" wording with similar wording which is less likely to add subject matter.

Things are more difficult if the examiner's amendment is directed to subject matter which is of no interest to the applicant; in this case, we can disapprove the text, directing the claims to desirable subject matter, but this may lead to a Summons to Oral Proceedings. A further option is to file a divisional application for the desired subject matter, but this is expensive. A more detailed analysis of the allowance and grant procedure may be found in Matthew Fletcher's Newsletter here.

Opposition Practice

The EPO provides an opportunity for third parties to oppose pa tents by filing an opposition within 9 months of the date of grant of the European patent. The opposition process has, in the past, taken many years.

As of July 2016 the EPO opposition procedure has been streamlined, with a target of 15 months for straightforward cases, from the end of the opposition deadline to the Oral Proceedings. Patentees are now given only 4 months to reply to the opposition, with extensions only being available in exceptional cases. Far fewer extensions are being sought than before, and extensions are only being granted in very limited cases; one should certainly not rely on being able to obtain an extension to the deadline. Some reasons which were acceptable in the past for obtaining an extension (e.g. patentee is a non-European company, and the European attorney has to liaise with another attorney who has to liaise with the patentee) are no longer acceptable. Patentees therefore need to consider the opposition at their earliest convenience.

It appears that the EPO is striving hard to meet the 15 month target. Summons to Oral Proceedings are being issued quickly after the patentee files its response to the opposition. While this streamlining process encourages the patentee to file more than one set of claims for consideration by the EPO, each of those sets of claims should seek to address and overcome objections raised in the opposition, not be a "fishing expedition" for what the EPO may or may not accept. We have also seen the EPO question whether or not to enter certain sets of claims into the proceedings because they do not limit the subject matter of the claims when compared to higher-ranked requests. Given the streamlining of the opposition procedure, we recommend that both the opponent and patentee address issues as soon as possible. For example, patentees should not assume that they will be able to file amended claim sets late in the proceedings. We also recommend patentees address all of the objections raised in an opposition, and reply robustly to the same in the response.

We recommend opponents submit all of their prior art, evidence and arguments when filing the opposition, bearing in mind that we have found it more productive to concentrate more on stronger arguments. Opponents should not rely on being able to introduce prior art late into the proceedings.


The EPO is proactively reducing its examination backlog and patents are now being granted within a more sensible timescale, which is only to be applauded. This has led, however, to some peculiar practices and outcomes. Applicants can, however, take steps to reduce the risk of such outcomes from occurring and to secure the patent protection they deserve.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions