UK: The Implications Of The Ocean Victory Case

Last Updated: 3 July 2017
Article by Andrew Rourke

On 10 May 2017, the Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the much anticipated appeal of the "OCEAN VICTORY" case1 .

The anticipation was warranted as the Court grappled with three key issues of English shipping law. Whilst none of the Court's findings may have been surprising following the Court of Appeal's judgment, one in particular has far reaching consequences and potentially severe financial implications for Owners and their insurers.

Facts

The events giving rise to this case occurred in October 2006 when the "OCEAN VICTORY" ran aground, and later broke apart, whilst attempting to leave the port of Kashima, Japan, in a gale. The vessel was on a ten year bareboat charter, on Barecon 89 as amended, from Ocean Victory Maritime (Owners) to Ocean Line Holdings (Charterers), which were a related company. Charterers chartered the vessel to China National Chartering Corp. (Time Charterers) on time charter, and Time Charterers sub-chartered to Daiichi (Voyage Charterers) on a time charter trip. Each charterparty contained a safe port warranty.

Insurers' losses resulting from the incident exceeded US $137 million in total, which included the value of the vessel, loss of earnings, salvage costs and wreck removal costs.

Gard, Owners'/Charterers' insurers, claimed these sums against Time Charterers, who claimed against Voyage Charterers, arguing that Kashima was unsafe as the casualty had been caused by a combination of severe northerly gales and a swell caused by long waves, both of which were known to be problems at the port.

Key Issues

The key issues, and those which the parties agreed the Supreme Court should decide, were:

  1. Was there a breach of the safe port undertaking in the charterparties?
  2. Did the co-insurance regime in clause 12 of the Barecon 89 form, prevent a claim from being brought for losses resulting from breach of the safe port warranty? This turned out to be the most contentious question for the Supreme Court and the aspect which would have the most far-reaching consequences.
  3. Were Voyage Charterers entitled to limit their liabilities for loss of the vessel under the 1976 Limitation Convention/Merchant Shipping Act 1995?

First Instance Decision

At first instance, the Judge found that the casualty was caused by long waves and severe northerly gales, each of which was not uncommon at Kashima. He concluded that the cause was therefore a "characteristic of the port" and not an "abnormal occurrence". Charterers were, therefore, in breach of the safe port undertaking.

He also found that clause 12 of the Barecon 89 form did not preclude a claim by Owners against Charterers, and so the claim could be passed on to Time Charterers.

Owners/their insurers were awarded over US $137 million at first instance.

Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal, however, took a very different view, finding that the port of Kashima was safe. The Judge had been wrong in his approach as he had decided that, because the two causes of the casualty were each common in themselves, he did not need to consider whether they were common in combination, yet it was this combination that had caused the loss. In addition, he had taken an excessively theoretical approach, considering what was theoretically foreseeable rather than looking closely at the history of the port in relation to the actual cause.

In relation to co-insurance, the Court of Appeal found that, even if Kashima had been unsafe, Charterers would not have been liable, as Owners had agreed to look to their insurers and not Charterers to compensate them for their losses. Charterers would, therefore, have had no indemnity claim against Time Charterers.

Owners and their insurers appealed.

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court dealt with the first and third issues easily coming to unanimous decisions on both.

Safe port warranty

The Judges upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal finding that the port was safe, and there had been no breach of the warranty. The first instance Judge had been incorrect to decide that because each cause of the incident (long waves and severe northerly gales) was, in and of itself common, they constituted a characteristic of the port and not an abnormal occurrence. Nor did the Supreme Court agree that the unsafety had to be simply "reasonably foreseeable". The Court held that this was an incorrect test, and shared the view of the Court of Appeal that the correct test, in this case, was to decide whether the coincidence of long waves and severe northerly gales was a characteristic of the port or an abnormal occurrence. They saw no reason to disagree with the Court of Appeal in its finding that the cause was an abnormal occurrence, and said that this term should be given its ordinary meaning, which is something rare and unexpected.

Limitation of liability

The Supreme Court found it equally straightforward to deal with the question of limitation of liability, endorsing the Court of Appeal's decision in the "CMA DJAKARTA"2, finding that Voyage Charterers would not have been entitled to limit their liability for the loss of the vessel under the 1976 Limitation Convention/Merchant Shipping act 1995.

Co-insurance

The most fascinating aspect of this judgment was how the Judges dealt with the co-insurance issue. The question arose as to whether - assuming there had been a breach of the safe port warranty - Gard, as Charterers' assignee, could claim the insured value of the vessel from Time Charterers, on the basis that Charterers would have been liable to the Owners for breach of the safe port undertaking This complex question split the Judges who upheld the Court of Appeal's view on the slimmest of majorities 3:2.

Under clause 12, Charterers were responsible for arranging and maintaining insurance approved by the Owners, in their joint names for an agreed value. Charterers were responsible for effecting all repairs (whether covered by the insurance or not). The clause provided for how insurance monies would be dealt with in the case of a total loss.

Lord Toulson, Lord Mance and Lord Hodge were of the view that the provisions of clause 12 of the demise charter precluded a claim between co-insureds so that the Owners could not claim against the Charterers. There was, therefore, no claim against Time Charterers.

The question that arose was whether the parties had intended to create an insurance fund which was the only avenue to be compensated for the relevant loss and damage, i.e. had they created a comprehensive regime for dealing with such losses? Alternatively, did the existence of this insurance fund somehow co-exist with an independent right of action for breach of the terms of the charter which caused the loss?

The three Judges in the majority were very clearly of the view that this was a comprehensive regime which left no avenue, under the contract, for a claim against a co-insured. One of the criticisms of this analysis is that it leaves the party which has suffered the loss without any avenue for recourse. This was, however, countered by an argument that a claim could have been brought on a different basis, e.g. bailment, which would have fallen outside of the contract and would, therefore, not have been precluded by the co-insurance regime. However, this was not a claim that was pursued by the Claimants in this case. With the benefit of hindsight, this was obviously a mistake, although few would have anticipated the implications of clause 12 when the claim was brought.

The approach taken by the dissenting Judges was particularly interesting. Lord Sumption and Lord Clarke agreed that the co-insureds could not claim against each other in respect of an insured loss. However, having answered this question, Lord Sumption posed a further question: "... when we say that one co-insured cannot claim damages against another for an insured loss, is that because the liability to pay damages is excluded by the terms of the contract, or is it because as between the co-insureds, the insurer's payment makes good any loss and thereby satisfies any liability to pay damages?"

His answer was that insurers' payment to Owners makes good Owners' losses, as between insurers, Owners and Charterers, and that this satisfies, but does not exclude, Charterers' liability for the loss of the ship under the charter. Charterers would, therefore, be able to claim against Time Charterers.

Comment

Whist this discussion may seem academic, it has very real financial consequences for insurers. Whilst part of the argument related to how clause 12 interacted with an amended clause 29 (safe port warranty), other causes of action could arise under the charter which could fall foul of this judgment.

Insurers now face the problem that there are many long term bareboat charters in existence which could be "ticking time bombs" with the potential for significant losses. Owners and insurers would be wise to take a long hard look at the co-insured regimes in their charterparties (and their interaction with other clauses) to avoid situations where insurers are devoid of contractual recourse for losses paid out.

Footnotes

1 Gard Marine and Energy Limited v China National Chartering Company Limited and another (2017)

2 CMA CGM SA v Classica Shipping Co Ltd (2004)

First published in Maritime Risk International, June 2017



The Implications Of The Ocean Victory Case

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Andrew Rourke
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.