UK: When Is A Package Not A Package? The Shipowner

Last Updated: 4 March 1998
As almost anyone involved in the shipping industry knows, in 1924 the Hague Rules, in the form of the International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law relating to Bills of Lading was signed at Brussels. Those Rules, in substantially the same form, were given statutory force in the United Kingdom as the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1924. That Act, of course, has been superseded by the Act of 1971, enacting the Hague Visby Rules, being the Hague Rules of 1924 as amended by a Protocol signed in 1968. Many countries, notably the United States, did not enact the revised rules and, accordingly, in those jurisdictions the 1924 Rules continue to have the force of law.

The Convention was a result of the increasing need, in the early years of the 20th century, for standardisation of Bills of Lading, given the increasing volume of international trade, by then largely conducted on the basis of negotiated bills, and the increasing ingenuity of shipowners to afford protection to themselves and their insurers against liability for cargo loss and damage sustained during the ocean voyage. One of the fundamental principles introduced by the Rules was the concept of limited liability. Article IV, Rule 5 limited the shipowners' liability in most case to £100 "per package or unit". By Article III, Rule 8, any clause agreeing a lower limit of liability is void.

Given the huge volume of English settled case law concerned with shipping disputes, and given the prominence of the Hague Rules in the 70 years since the Convention was signed, it is very surprising that until July 1997 there existed no English law authority as to what constitutes a "package" for the purposes of calculating the shipowners'' limit of liability where the goods the subject of the claim are stowed in a container.

In the case of the "RIVER GURARA", in July 1997, the English Court of Appeal had to consider the meaning of a "package or unit" under Article IV, Rule 5 of the Hague Rules in the circumstances of a total loss of cargo. The Bills of Lading described the cargo said by the shippers to be within the containers as a given number of "bales", "parcels", "bags", "bundles", "crates", "cartons", or "pallets". The case fell to be considered under the terms of the 1924 Convention because the law applicable at the port of shipment incorporated the Hague Rules in their unamended form.

The Court was therefore required to consider not only whether the container was properly treated as the "package or unit" for the purposes of the Rules but, if the answer to that question was no, whether the package or unit was the number of, say, crates or pallets stowed in the container, or any smaller category of goods or packing units described on the Bill of Lading.

The Court of Appeal analysed at some length the large body of US case law on this issue. The US decisions are concerned with construing what is written on the face of the Bill of Lading, treating that document as representing an agreement between the parties. The Court clearly felt uncomfortable with that approach. Lord Justice Phillips, in a careful analysis of the law, established that it is far from invariably the case that statements contained in the Bill of Lading describing the cargo loaded amount to a binding agreement between the parties as to the identity and quantity of the cargo. In many cases, particularly where the cargo is stuffed in containers, the Bill of Lading is no more than prima facie evidence of the quantity loaded. The Court also found that it would be wrong to give precedence over the natural meaning of the Rules themselves to any agreement between the parties (whether in the Bill of Lading or elsewhere) as to what constituted a "package". The Court felt that to allow shipowners to reach agreement in those terms, particularly in the Bill of Lading, would effectively negate the scheme of liabilities contained in the Hague Rules. This approach was, therefore, rejected because to adopt it would allow the parties (particularly the shipowner) to avoid one of the fundamental purposes of the Rules by carefully selecting the meaning of the word "package".

The Court found, however, that the limit of the shipowner's liability should be calculated by reference to the number of units recorded in the Bill of Lading as stowed within the containers loaded. Where the Bill indicates that more than one unit of packing has been used (for example, bundles on pallets) then it is the smallest category of packaging unit which forms the basis for the calculation of the limit of the shipowners' liability. Consistent with this approach, Lord Justice Phillips found that if the cargo claim is proved or disproved by reference to material extrinsic to the Bill of Lading, then the limit of liability must be calculated by reference to that extrinsic evidence. He suggested that if on such a calculation the shipowners' liability is greater than according to the calculation performed by reference to the goods as described in the Bill of Lading, it is likely that the shipowner would have a claim for breach of warranty against the shipper.

Thus, the Court of Appeal found that the basis for the calculation of the limit of liability is the number of cartons, bundles or other small units contained in the Bill of Lading where their existence and number is established either by the prima facie evidence created by the Bill of Lading itself, or by other extrinsic information. Lord Justice Phillips accepted the somewhat unsatisfactory nature of any calculation performed by reference to extrinsic evidence but pointed out that in the vast majority of cases both parties are prepared to accept the evidential status of the Bill of Lading for the purposes of calculating the limit of liability. As a result of the very detailed analysis of the effect and status of the description of the goods as contained in the Bill of Lading, the Court also considered the effect of the commonly used qualification statements "weight, number and quantity unknown" and "said to contain". The effect of the first phrase, in the case of goods stowed in a container, is to negate any evidential status of the Bill of Lading so that the claimant must prove by other evidence the shipment of goods of which loss or damage is claimed, including the number of packages. The Court did not, however, make the same finding in relation to the phrase "said to contain". It held that this indicates an acceptance on behalf of the shipowner of the details provided to him by the shipper and as anticipated by the Hague Rules, Article III, Rule 3, which requires the issue of a Bill of Lading showing "the number of packages or pieces...as furnished in writing by the shipper".

That the Court had to consider this question at all in 1997 is to a degree surprising, given that one of the reasons for the modification of the 1924 Rules by the 1968 Protocol was to reflect the increasing trend towards containerised shipments. Accordingly, the 1971 Act contains, at Article III, Rule 5(c), specific wording making it clear that a container is treated as a "package or unit" for the purposes of limitation of liability only where the Bill of Lading does not show the number of packages or units within the container. Nevertheless, the 1924 Rules in their unamended form continue to have legislative force in many countries.

The Court of Appeal's decision makes it clear that the precise provisions of the Rules continue to have relevance today. In practical terms, moreover, there is a clear lesson for shipowners. In shipments where the 1924 Rules apply and where a shipowner has no reasonable means of checking the shipper's information as to the contents of a container and where there may be some reason for doubt or uncertainty as to those contents, it is prudent for the Bill of Lading to be endorsed "weight, number and quantity unknown". That endorsement shifts to the shipper the burden of proving what was shipped both for the purposes of the claim and for the calculation of the limit of liability. In the absence of such evidence, the shipowner will be entitled to limit his liability by reference to the number of containers. It is now clear, however, that use of the phrase "said to contain" has a much lesser effect. Shipowners should, therefore, be aware that Bills of Lading claused in this way will result in their limit of l ability being calculated by reference to the number of packages revealed by the Bill of Lading to be stowed within the container and not the number of containers carried.

This note is intended to provide general information about some recent and anticipated developments which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive nor to provide any specific legal advice and should not be acted or relied upon as doing so. Professional advice appropriate to the specific situation should always be obtained.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions