European Union: Brexit Report On "Justice For Families, Individuals And Businesses"

Last Updated: 24 April 2017
Article by Jonathan Haydn-Williams

The House of Lords EU Committee has published a report about the effect of Brexit on three EU Regulations which together 'play an important role in facilitating the daily operation of the European legal system'. Jonathan Haydn-Williams looks at the Committee's conclusions as to the Brussels I Regulation 'recast', relating to jurisdiction and judgments in civil and commercial matters.

On 20 March 2017, the House of Lords EU Committee published a report entitled 'Brexit: justice for families, individuals and businesses?' (HL Paper 134)  ('the report').

The report concerns the Brexit aspects of three EU Regulations:

  • Regulation 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast): the so-called Brussels I Regulation recast  ('BIR').
  • Regulation 2201/2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility: the so-called  Brussels IIa Regulation.
  • Regulation 4/2009 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance: the so-called Maintenance Regulation.

This article comments on the Committee's conclusions as to the first mentioned Regulation, the 'BIR'. Comments on the other two Regulations will be for another commentator on another day.

History of the BIR

When the UK joined what was then known as the 'common market', the 1968 Brussels Convention was already in existence. This was an agreement between the original six members of the European Economic Community (EEC) as to jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters within the common market. The idea was, and remains, a simple one: for a free trade zone to function effectively, there needs to be a mechanism:

  • to determine which country's courts have jurisdiction in disputes between persons (both individuals and businesses) from different member states, to avoid two or more different countries' courts claiming jurisdiction; and
  • to enable judgments of the court with jurisdiction to be recognised and enforced without difficulty in the other member states of the free trade zone, so as to avoid the problem of an enforcing court seeking to re-hear a case on its merits or otherwise placing obstacles to the recognition and      enforcement of the judgment.

In short, the resolution of disputes is a key aspect of free trade within a single market.

As the rules were in a convention, rather than – at that stage – a directly enforceable regulation, domestic UK legislation was needed to give them effect within the UK. This took the form of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 ('CJJA 1982'), which came into force in 1987. The CJJA 1982 also reformed the rules for recognition and enforcement of judgments within the constituent countries of the UK, so as to mirror the rules applicable as regards other member states of the EEC. Those internal rules appear likely to remain in place, at least in the medium term.

The 1968 Brussels Convention was later amended and turned into a directly applicable Regulation, which was itself amended so as to become what is now the BIR.

The effect of the BIR extends not only to disputes involving parties in other EU member states, but also to disputes with parties from other countries in the world.

The BIR assists both UK businesses and consumers, including, for instance:

  • a UK business which wishes to sue over a contract with  a party from another member state. If the contract is to be performed in that other member state, the courts of that other member state will decide on the dispute and its enforcement. If, however, it is to be performed in the UK, a UK court can decide and its judgment will be enforceable in the other member state
  • a UK consumer who purchases an item from a business in  another EU state. Under consumer rules, the dispute will probably be decided by a UK court (rather than a court in, say, Spain), with the UK judgment then being enforceable in the other EU state.

Effect of leaving the EU on the BIR

The BIR will cease to apply upon the EU membership treaties ceasing to apply to the UK.

It is clear from the above examples that the BIR affords legal rights to UK citizens which will be lost by Brexit, such as led the Supreme Court to decide that the notification of an intention to leave the EU under article 50 had to be authorised by Parliament, rather than by exercise of prerogative power.

Whether that notification is revocable – contrary to the UK government's present line that it is not – would have to be the subject of another article. In my view, the arguments favour the view that it is revocable. However, what is set out below is based on the perhaps unfounded assumption that it is irrevocable or that, if it is revocable, the UK people are either not given the opportunity to express their 'will' on the final Brexit terms (if any) or are given the opportunity and vote to approve them.

The House of Lord's report notes that losing the BIR will create uncertainty for UK businesses and individuals and possibly render the UK a less attractive venue for the litigation of cross-border disputes.

How can the BIR be replaced?

It is clear that there is no wish on the part of the UK government to replace the BIR with a directly equivalent treaty with the EU, in that the BIR is subject to the jurisdiction of the EU Court of Justice ('CJEU'), which the government intends shall hold no sway in the UK.

The report concludes that:

  • Due to the need for reciprocity between the UK and EU member states in order for a BIR-type agreement to work, the Great Repeal Bill or other UK new legislation cannot be of any assistance.
  • The negotiation of a new treaty with the EU in the BIR field does not appear in the White Paper on Brexit negotiations and is, unfortunately, low on the government's priorities.
  • Falling back on English and Welsh common law rules as to jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments does not provide a solution, in that they have lain undeveloped for 40 years.
  • Greater use of arbitration in cross-border disputes, whilst providing a boost for London arbitration activity, would not provide a viable solution to the loss of the BIR, because of 'the importance of the principles of justice, in particular openness and fairness, underpinned by the publication of      judgments and authorities, which are fundamental to open law'.
  • An application to join the Lugano Convention (currently between the EU and Iceland, Norway and Switzerland) offers an approach that is next-best, though not ideal, to negotiating a new BIR-type treaty with the EU. 'Lugano' is broadly equivalent in concept and intent to the BIR, but is not subject to the jurisdiction of the CJEU, the courts of the three non-EU states agreeing only to pay regard to the decisions of the CJEU. However, the report notes that 'Lugano' does not include the BIR's      improvements upon its previous versions and would therefore not be as beneficial for UK businesses and individuals.
  • Other possibilities include ratifying the Hague Convention on Choice of Law Agreements and enacting into UK law the Rome I and II Regulations on the law applicable, respectively, to contracts and to non-contractual obligations (which do not require reciprocity). The report concludes that the best pragmatic solution available may be to follow those possibilities, as well as to apply for the UK to become a party to the Lugano Convention.

Comment

I agree with most of the report's conclusions.

The common law does not provide a solution, for a number of reasons.

  • Those who have entered into contracts, before perhaps the term 'Brexit' was even coined, will have entered into contracts based on the BIR mechanisms, particular as to choice of court. To seek to apply a different regime if contract disputes arise could cause uncertainty and unfairness – hardly a good advert for English litigation.
  • The common law can only be updated and developed by actual cases in the courts, which have to be funded by the litigants. Parties seldom wish to be part of a test case.
  • Developments in the common law take time. That delay would cause uncertainty, again to the detriment of the reputation of English litigation.
  • It would be odd to have the statutory 'relic' of the BIR system in place for disputes that cross the UK's internal borders, whilst those that cross its external borders are subject to the common law.
  • The 'common law' on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments is a misnomer, as there are UK statutes which apply where the UK has reciprocal arrangements in place, in the form of treaties with other countries, including those in the Commonwealth.
  • Those common law and statutory rules fall a long way short of providing a system such as that of the BIR. For instance, they may not apply to non-money judgments and the rules as to jurisdiction tend to be wider than those as to recognition and enforcement of judgments. For example, whilst the      relevant rules in England and Barbados are in essence the same, it is quite possible for the Barbados courts to rule that they have jurisdiction over an English resident, but for the English courts to decline to enforce the judgment – and for the mirror situation to apply if an English court assumes jurisdiction over a Barbados resident.

I disagree with the report's conclusions as to arbitration.

  • To suggest that arbitration does not provide justice and fairness is, in my view, a misconception. The Arbitration Act 1996 provides a legislative requirement of fairness, which is bolstered by the requirements of fairness of article 6.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (as given direct effect in the UK by the Human Rights Act 1998).
  • Openness of hearings to the public is a safeguard when parties are forced to take part in litigation. But arbitration is voluntary, and there can be no objection to parties wishing and consenting to having their disputes heard in private. Indeed, any unfairness would arise out of a system which prevented that. The interests of consumers against suppliers etc obtaining consent to arbitration in the 'small print' are protected by consumer legislation.
  • If parties wish, arbitration hearings can take place in public and arbitrators' awards can be published. That happens, for example, in the case of decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport at the Olympics.
  • Under the Arbitration Act 1996, the English courts exercise supervisory jurisdiction and cases may end up before the courts, at public hearings, if, for instance, an arbitrator is accused of acting in an irregular way.
  • The significance of arbitration in the present context is that it is, in general terms, not part of the BIR, but has international acceptance under certain treaties, in particular the 1958 New York Convention, which would facilitate, for example, the enforcement of a London arbitration award in France.

Arbitration cannot provide a complete solution to the loss of the BIR, but it is for sure part of it.

The report does not address the third issue facing litigators (in addition to jurisdiction and recognition/enforcement of judgments), namely that of service of proceedings in other EU member states. This is the subject of an EU Regulation, having formerly been covered by an EEC Convention, which came into effect in the late 1980s. Prior to that, even though jurisdiction of an English court over a German defendant, for instance, and enforcement of an English judgment in Germany was covered by the predecessor of the BIR, trying to serve the proceedings in Germany was difficult and time-consuming. Once the Service Regulation goes, litigators will face that problem again unless alternative arrangements are agreed.

Finally, for practitioners, there are the Civil Procedure Rules ('CPR') to contend with. If or when the post-BIR position is revealed, the committee responsible for the CPR will need to act smartly to amend the Rules. One can only guess at the confusion that will be caused to practitioners should the post-BIR position remain unclear.

In light of the above, I am recommending to clients that:

  • unless there is a specific objection, new cross-border contracts should contain arbitration clauses, rather than submission to jurisdiction of courts; and
  • if a submission to jurisdiction is made to the courts of England and Wales, the contract should also provide for service of process within the jurisdiction of those courts on an agent of any overseas party.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.