UK: Comparative Advertising

Last Updated: 29 April 2008
Article by Georgie Collins

Open season?

Recent decisions in the UK and European courts have restricted the use of trade mark law to resolve comparative advertising disputes, making it easier for an advertiser to use a competitor's trade mark in its own adverts. Such disputes should now be dealt with under the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive, but brand owners believe this provides them with a far less rigorous mechanism of enforcement and redress. So, what has happened to bump the challenging legal field of comparative advertising out of the arena of trade mark law? Georgie Collins takes a closer look at the two cases in question.

02 and Hutchinson 3G (2008)

Hutchinson 3G was a late entrant to the mobile phone market. In asserting itself in the market it launched an advertising campaign which compared its cheaper pre-pay service to those of its rivals 02, T-Mobile, Vodafone and Orange. 02 owns a number of trade marks but of relevance in this case was its registrations for a range of 'bubble' images.

The 3G ad in question used the word "02" together with moving pictures of bubbles. Whilst 02 did not claim that 3G's advert was misleading, it sued for trade mark infringement in the UK claiming that the images were confusingly similar to its own bubble image trade marks. 3G defended saying that its advertisement complied with the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive ("the Directive") which sets out the criteria that comparative adverts must meet to be permitted.

The Directive requires that the advert:

1. must not be misleading;

2. must objectively compare goods or services meeting the same needs or intended for the same purpose;

3. must objectively compare features of the goods including prices;

4. must not discredit or denigrate the trade marks or other activities or services of the competitor;

5. where it relates to products with a designation of origin, relates only to products with the same designation;

6. must not take unfair advantage of the competitors trade mark or its reputation;

7. must not present the goods or services as imitations or replicas of those bearing the trade mark; and

8. must not create confusion between the advertiser and trade mark owner.

3G claimed its advertisement fell squarely within the above criteria. The High Court agreed and dismissed O2's action. In fact the court held that, whilst 3G had infringed 02's marks by virtue of its use of bubbles similar to 02's registered bubbles, it nonetheless did indeed have a defence under the Directive.

O2 then took its case to the Court of Appeal, claiming that under the construction of the Directive 3G had to show that it was "necessary" for it to use 02's trade marks but that there was no need to use bubbles because 3G could simply have referred to O2 by name.

3G counter-argued that "necessity" was not required under the Directive. Furthermore it said that, even if the court considered that the directive had not been complied with, 3G also had a defence pursuant to section 10(6), Trade Marks Act 1994 because it had used 02's trade marks in a purely descriptive manner.

In October 2007 the Court of Appeal commented that the defence afforded by section 10(6) was a "home-grown" UK provision which did not reflect the wording of the Trade Marks Directive (from which the UK Trade Marks Act is derived) and so should be repealed as an unnecessary distraction, to and complication of, UK law.

The Court of Appeal then referred three questions to the European Court of Justice (the ultimate forum in which EU member states questions of trade mark interpretation are determined) and the Advocate General delivered an interim decision on 31 January 2008. (Whilst the Advocate General's opinion is only a precursor to the ECJ's own decision, in the majority of cases the ECJ does follow it.)

The questions referred by the Court of Appeal were as follows.

Question 1: Does the use of registered trade marks in comparative advertising cases fall foul of the trade mark infringement provisions dealing with the use of those marks, particularly if the use of the trade mark in the advertisement does not cause confusion or jeopardise the function of the trade mark?

The Advocate General stated that comparative advertising had been harmonised in Europe by the misleading and comparative advertising directive and, consequently, comparative adverts should not be considered under rules relating to trade mark infringement.

Question 2: Where a trader uses the registered trade mark of a competitor in a comparative advertisement must that use be necessary if it is to comply with the provisions which permit comparative advertising? (See points 1-8 above.)

The Advocate General said that use of the trade mark in an advertisement did not have to be "necessary" as this was not a requirement specified by the legislation or by previous case law. In fact, if a requirement of necessity were introduced, this would run counter to the spirit of the comparative advertising directive which sought to encourage comparative advertising.

Question 3: If there is a requirement of necessity, does this preclude any use of a sign which is not identical to the registered trade mark but is closely similar to it?

In view of the Advocate General's response to question two this question no longer required an answer.

Boehringer v Vetplus (2007)

The Court of Appeal's decision in Boehringer v Vetplus in June 2007 added a twist for any brand owner seeking an injunction to restrain publication of a comparative advertisement.

Boehringer and Vetplus both produce and market nutritional supplements for dogs. Boehringer sought an interim injunction to prevent Vetplus from publishing an advert comparing their respective canine comestibles. The Vetplus advert claimed that Boehringer's product contained one nutrient in lower levels than was claimed on the product labelling. Boehringer claimed in turn that Vetplus' tests for determining the percentage levels of nutrients were unreliable and that it would suffer detriment to its brand if the advert was allowed to be published. The High Court initially granted an injunction restraining publication of the advert pending trial, but when the parties returned to court for the full trial of the case the court refused to maintain the injunction.

Boehringer then appealed to the Court of Appeal which also dismissed its claim.

The Vetplus defence to Boehringer's trade mark claim was that it honestly and reasonably believed that its statements about the results of its nutrient content tests were true even though they subsequently turned out to be incorrect. The Court of Appeal held that a party could not avail itself of the defence of acting in accordance with honest practices if it made a statement it thought to be true which later turned out to be false but then refused to compensate the person who had suffered damage as a result of that statement.

Notwithstanding the fact that the Vetplus defence failed, Boehringer still failed in its application for an injunction. The Court of Appeal took the opportunity to review the law and criteria relating to the granting of injunctions in comparative advertising cases, having particular regard to the impact of the Human Rights Act which seeks to protect freedom of expression.

Section 12(3) of the Human Rights Act states that no interim relief is to be granted so as to prevent publication before trial unless the court is satisfied that the applicant seeking the relief is likely to establish that the publication should not be allowed. The Court of Appeal reviewed the usual test applied to interim injunction applications, known as the American Cyanamid rules, which require that the applicant seeking an interim injunction demonstrate that there is a serious issue to be tried.

However, in this case Lord Justice Jacob said that since comparative advertisements involve freedom of expression, the correct test was whether the applicant was more likely than not to succeed at trial. On this basis the Boehringer appeal against the court's refusal to grant it an injunction was refused.

What these decisions mean for brand owners

If the ECJ follows the Advocate General's decision in the O2 case, brand owners will not be able to use trade mark legislation either to prevent a comparative advertisement (through an injunction) or to sue in respect of its use. There is no provision under the Directive for a trade mark owner to bring legal proceedings in its own name: this means that the brand owner loses control over the misuse of its trade mark(s) and must instead rely on the Advertising Standards Authority and Office of Fair Trading (the enforcing bodies under the directive) to take action.

The impact of the 02 and Boehringer cases will be felt most by large brand owners where competition is high and products and services are price sensitive.

If the ECJ adopts the Advocate General's opinion then the law relating to comparative advertising will effectively have been rendered toothless. However, it will be interesting to see the decision of the ECJ and any gloss it adds to the judicial comments already made. The ECJ's role is only to answer the questions referred to it; once it has delivered its judgment the 02 case will be remitted back to the UK courts for them to interpret the ECJ decision and apply it to the facts of the case.

As the Boehringer case highlights, advertisers need to take care with regard to the claims they make; if it is found that the claims are not in accordance with honest practices substantial damages may be payable.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions