UK: Dispute Resolution In Blockchain: Do You Need An Umbrella?

Last Updated: 7 March 2017
Article by Lee Bacon

In our series of articles addressing the legal structures of smart contracts or dynamic contracts – some of which will utilise blockchain technology – it has been shown that existing legal principles and structures are more than capable of providing a suitable framework to enable the development of such arrangements to flourish.

We previously looked at arbitrating blockchain disputes, but now take those thoughts further looking firstly at how inconsistent dispute resolution clauses can arise and the problems they cause, and secondly why arbitration is a suitable dispute resolution method for blockchain disputes. The framework is such that lends itself to the parties agreeing an umbrella agreement at the outset.

The danger of inconsistent dispute resolution agreements – a worked example

Consider an agreement under which X (a Chinese company) ships goods to Y (a Tanzanian company). A Decentralised Autonomous Organisation (DAO) or simple host management arrangement operates through computers stored in Estonia (the Administrator). The Administrator uses smart contracts to trigger payments from Y to X on delivery of the goods and satisfactory data downloaded from the vessel during transportation as to humidity etc. X sends approximately 100 shipments to Y per year, all of which are paid upon the trigger under the smart contract.

  • X and Y have a contract providing for arbitration in London under English law.
  • X and Y both have separate contracts with the Administrator (assuming the Administrator is a legal entity capable of contracting which is not a given): X's contract provides for litigation in China under Chinese law; Y's provides for litigation in Estonia under Estonian law.
  • At a mid-point in the year, X ships goods to Y, Y receives them but no payment is made (Y being unaware payment hasn't been made as the payment should have been automatic).
  • The 'failure' may be in the software which is physically based in Estonia and, arguably, the failure happened when the 'trigger failed' on delivery to Y in Tanzania. The failure could however be due to an Act of God, frustration or other event which would, in one view render the Administrator/chain not liable for the failure of the trigger.
  • X sues Y for the unpaid sums and consequential loss commencing arbitration in London. From X's point of view it is a simple debt claim, Y receives the goods but did not pay. The arbitration should be unnecessary or, at worst, quick and cheap.
  • Y sues the Administrator in Estonia under Estonian law while defending the arbitration in London. From Y's perspective it is not at fault for not paying (and any resulting loss) as it had the smart contract in place to ensure payment was made and Y is not at fault if that mechanism fails.
  • Y cannot bring the Administrator into the arbitration as it is not a party and is not party to any compatible arbitration clause that could lead to a consolidation.
  • There is then the further complication of Y's liability being tested under English law and the Administrator's liability being tested under Estonian law. There is no compulsion for compatible judgments to be made as between an arbitral tribunal and an Estonian court leaving all three parties in an unsatisfactory position.

What's the solution to inconsistent dispute resolution provisions?

Having the worked example above in mind, it is clear that just as every transaction needs careful consideration, so does every dispute resolution agreement throughout the chain or a contractual relationship. As one party is unlikely to control the chain, or even be aware of all of the relationships within it, it is key to address the dispute resolution provision at an early stage in order to establish what the method will be and how it will permeate through the chain. The choice of method and jurisdiction will be impacted by many factors including the nature and location of the parties and their assets, and, significantly, the parties' relative bargaining-power.

The clearest solution is for the parties to enter into a master or 'umbrella' dispute resolution agreement which ensures that the same law and dispute resolution procedure is applicable throughout the chain (and linked to any related letter of credit, performance band or insurance protection). Such an agreement (whether it provide for litigation or arbitration) should enable disputes to be joined or consolidated in appropriate circumstances. Consolidation and joinder have come to the fore in arbitration in recent years in recognition of the increase in complex trading relationships, indeed, all of the leading arbitral institutions now provide how and when joinder and consolidation may be ordered.

An umbrella agreement of this nature would require clear direction and management (our tripartite example above being overly simplistic) but may well save time and costs incurred in fighting in a variety of jurisdictions and the eventual potential incompatible judgments or awards. A note of caution must be exercised over the enforcement of umbrella agreements and parties' knowledge or agreement to having entered into them. This can be addressed in the direction and management required as stated above.

The benefits of arbitration for blockchain

Given the international nature of the parties and relationships engaged in many blockchain initiatives, thoughts naturally turn to the sphere of arbitration as the appropriate choice of dispute resolution. The key drivers behind any choice of arbitration are:

  • Flexibilty: Whilst there are currently no specialist rules, commercial arbitration rules such as those of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) are deliberately designed to enable flexibility within the procedure so that it can be adapted to suit the needs of the parties and the nature of the dispute.
  • Choice of tribunal: The tribunal will either be appointed by the parties or a chosen arbitral institution. The arbitration agreement can provide for the arbitrator(s) to have the expertise required to determine any dispute or, preferably, the parties can nominate or appoint arbitrators with an understanding of the complexities of this field at the time of appointment. In either event, a specialised tribunal should result in saved time and costs and avoid an award based on misunderstandings or misconceptions. This is not in any way to cast doubt on the abilities of many specialist judges, simply to say that in arbitration, with a well-considered arbitration clause you can avoid the risk of a judge who is out of step with the technology in question.
  • Choice of Forum: In choosing an arbitral seat the parties can choose a recognised arbitral forum where the local laws and judiciary are supportive of the process. Combined with the choice of tribunal this gives the parties greater security of a fair and robust process.
  • Speed: Blockchain's strengths lie in multi or serial transactions potentially over a long period of time. Given this, dispute resolution might be required mid-relationship and a speedy resolution required in order to preserve the relationship and enable the parties to continue. Expedited procedures are available from several of the leading arbitral institutions or can be agreed between the parties in their arbitration agreement or at the time a dispute arises. There are various ways of achieving this such as documents only procedures, limited disclosure and/or evidence or full-arbitration procedures within an expedited timescale. Interim measures are also available from the tribunal, for example to protect assets or the courts of the seat, assuming a strong seat is selected, are able to act quickly and effectively to support the arbitral process. The key, again, is in a well-drafted agreement, and which is tailored to interact with the code in the smart contract. We are actively engaged in considering blockchain agreements which build in an automatic 'pause' or 'reflection' period, pursuant to which fast-track arbitration can be instigated.
  • Confidentiality: Arbitration is a confidential process between the parties. Hearings are not held in open court and are not reported. It is well recognised as the dispute resolution mechanism of choice for the protection of commercial interests (this said a separate confidentiality agreement for clarity is often advised).
  • Enforcement: Arbitral awards are enforceable under the 'New York Convention' in 157 countries worldwide and enforcement can only be challenged on very strict grounds. While court judgments from many jurisdictions have reciprocal enforcement regimes, they can be more difficult and take longer to process. Whether litigation or arbitration is chosen, the effectiveness of any future considered at the outset and protections such as insurance considered and, if necessary, provided for. 

The admitted limitation of arbitration, which is also one of its key strengths in many regards, is the privacy of the arbitration agreement. It only applies between the parties who entered into the arbitration agreement. Under most sets of institutional arbitral rules a third party can be joined with the consent of all parties but this is not straightforward. As stated above, an umbrella agreement is one way to address this.

While blockchain related smart or dynamic contracts continue to develop, we continue to learn how it relates to the many and varied legal systems in which it operates. In anticipating potential future disputes we seek to place clients in the best possible should the worst happen - if it might rain, consider taking an umbrella.

Dispute Resolution In Blockchain: Do You Need An Umbrella?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions