UK: The Decline Of English Libel Trials?

Last Updated: 29 February 2008
Article by Alasdair Pepper and Antonia Foster

Reading libel Judgments from the English courts provides information about developments in the law but does much less in terms of informing of trends and approaches being used by legal practitioners in the field. Court Judgments also state little about the vast majority of claims which are settled without contested hearings and often without court proceedings being commenced at all.

Over recent years the balance in England has undoubtedly shifted towards early settlement, with fewer large scale trials. There are a number of driving factors towards this:

Offer Of Amends Procedure

This is a statutory provision which permits a defendant, in receipt of a libel complaint, to accept responsibility for the publication and in effect to "own up" to its mistake. In making such an offer they commit to making a "suitable correction" and "sufficient apology" and to pay "such compensation (if any) and such costs, as may be agreed or determined". These provisions were designed to encourage the early resolution of complaints and, although they came into force in 2000, it is only over the last few years that they have been increasingly used by defendants to good effect to do just this. They not only reduce a defendant's exposure on costs but where the court is asked to determine compensation, which is done by a Judge alone, it will often award substantially reduced damages (sometimes by as much as 50%) to reflect the benefit of an early apology to the claimant and, in effect, reward a defendant for admitting its mistake and seeking to rectify it at an early stage.

Part 36 Procedure

This is a formal procedure under which both claimants and defendants can make a without prejudice offer to the other to settle an action. Routinely such an offer will include terms as to damages, an apology, costs and undertakings. If an offer is not accepted and the party that made the offer does better than the offer at trial, he may recover a higher scale of costs from the losing party and interest on damages and costs awarded to him. These offers are being increasingly used by both claimant and defendant lawyers to bring pressure to bear on the other party to settle. They are particularly effective in Offer of Amends cases because a tariff of likely awards of damages has and is being established from the cases that have received judicial determination.

Conditional Fee Agreements And After The Event Insurance

Libel litigation in England has traditionally been seen as a rich man's game, available only to those with significant assets, which they can afford to lose, and less often to the average man in the street. The inherent unfairness of this has been that, very often, a libellous article in a local newspaper is just as damaging to the reputation and livelihood of a sole-trader making a modest living, as a libellous article in a national newspaper might be to a wealthy businessman, but only one of them was likely to have the means to sue.

In recent years this balance has been redressed to some degree with claimants, in particular, taking advantage of the Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) or "no win no fee" regime, as well as After the Event (ATE) insurance, the latter providing some protection against any order made against a party for their opponent's costs. Taken together CFAs and ATE have eased the financial exposure individual claimants might otherwise face and they are now commonplace in libel proceedings. They have served to level the playing field a little between a claimant with a good claim but modest means, and substantial publishers.

The advent of CFAs and ATE has led to trials where otherwise court action might have been impossible for the claimant. However, the very considerable majority of such cases are settled. One of the reasons for this is that if a CFA case is won at trial, the successful lawyers are likely to be entitled to a success fee of 100% of their normal professional charges recovered between the parties, and the ATE premiums can be very substantial. Therefore, losing to a CFA funded claimant is very expensive. However, the converse is also true. A losing lawyer on a CFA receives no payment. The consequence is that all involved are bound very carefully to consider and explore the options to settle and in this the Offer of Amends and Part 36 procedures have become very important.

Defence Of Responsible Journalism

Another reason for the decline in the number of trials is the uncertainty of the state of particular aspects of the law of defamation, and of the responsible journalism or "Reynolds" defence in particular. This defence, which takes its name from the case brought by Albert Reynolds, the former Irish premier, against the Sunday Times (Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 (Reynolds)), provides protection to a defendant even where it has published allegations of a claimant, which subsequently prove to have been untrue, but where it can persuade the court that in all the circumstances publication was reasonable and responsible. The defence is based on the notion that there are certain circumstances in which the public interest dictates that an allegation should be protected regardless of whether or not it is true. The House of Lords was seen, in that case, to have widened the scope for reporting matters of public interest.

In Reynolds, Nicholls LJ laid down a list of 10 factors, not intended to be exhaustive, to be borne in mind when assessing whether a defendant had been responsible in its publication. These included matters such as the seriousness of the allegation, the steps taken to verify the information, the urgency of publication, the tone of the article and whether the allegation was put to the claimant prior to publication.

Since Reynolds, case law concerning these "10 factors" and the court's approach as to whether a defendant has or has not reported responsibly has grown. This has helped in assessing the merits of any particular claim. However, in October 2006 the House of Lords handed down its Judgment in Jameel v- Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL [2006] UKHL 44, in which it found for the defendant. This was greeted warmly by the media and some viewed it as the House of Lords' moving the "Reynolds" defence in favour of media defendants and in support of freedom of speech.

In the case, proceedings were brought against the newspaper over allegations of links to terrorism. From the outset the defendants never sought to argue that the allegations were true, merely that they had been published responsibly. The trial Judge, who had heard the case with a Jury, did not agree with the defendants that in the circumstances of that case the newspaper had done enough and nor did the Court of Appeal. However the House of Lords took a different view some three years' later and in so doing delivered their analysis, and indeed criticism, of the way in which the Reynolds defence had been operating. The House of Lords decided that the lower courts had been applying Lord Nicholl's criteria too rigidly and thereby subverting the initial intention of the defence. For example, the House of Lords concluded that the Court of Appeal was wrong to decide that the failure to put the allegations to the claimant prior to publication was fatal in the circumstances. This was notwithstanding the seriousness of the allegations - but this will not necessarily be the case in other circumstances.

The result is that the assessment of when defendants will or will not have done enough to satisfy the court that the article of which complaint has been made was, in all the circumstances, the product of "responsible journalism", has become more difficult. This provides a further inducement to claimants and defendants and their lawyers to settle claims if possible, rather than face the increased uncertainty and expense of a contested trial.

The Internet

Although the number of libel trials is diminishing there is less evidence that libel complaints are reducing in number. One area in which libel complaints are on the increase is those arising out of publications on the internet. Given the use of the internet in all aspects of our lives it is no wonder that claimants, including international claimants with reputations in England to protect, are increasingly looking to protect their reputation there too.

However, often with complaints about material on the internet, a claimant's primary objective is to have the offending material taken down and if this is done quickly, which it often is when English law is in play, then the complaint can be settled quickly. Thus to date, the increase in internet related complaints of libel has not resulted in an increase in libel trials, although a number of internet related trials have taken place.

Greater Pragmatism And Co-Operation Between Claimant And Defendant Lawyers Towards Resolving Disputes

Possibly claimant and defendant lawyers in the field have become more inclined on behalf of their clients to take pragmatic approaches to matters in dispute between clients and to look harder for possible means by which those differences might be resolved without litigation. Mediation and arbitration is on the increase and costs and other Protocols have been introduced by some firms to try to avoid satellite litigation over costs and other issues such as levels of success fees in CFA cases. This too may have resulted in fewer cases issued and, in turn, fewer trials.


Although the landscape is shifting and the number of trials reducing, libel practitioners in England seem to be as busy as ever, on behalf of both national and international clients, with reputations in England to protect.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.