ARTICLE
30 January 2008

EAT Increases Scope Of Claims Made By Overseas Workers

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

In Bleuse v MBT Transport Ltd, the EAT allowed a German lorry driver, who lived in Germany but was employed by an English company, to pursue claims for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations, but not claims for unfair dismissal and deductions from wages.
United Kingdom Employment and HR

In Bleuse v MBT Transport Ltd, the EAT allowed a German lorry driver, who lived in Germany but was employed by an English company, to pursue claims for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations, but not claims for unfair dismissal and deductions from wages. They allowed the Working Time Regulations to proceed, because that right is derived from an EU directive. Unfair dismissal and deductions from wages are, however, purely 'home grown' rights, so the EAT followed the Serco case and disallowed them.

This decision has implications for all statutory rights based on European legislation. The EAT cast doubt on its own previous decisions that only employees based in the UK could bring claims under, for example, the Disability Discrimination Act and the Fixed Term Workers regulations, since these arguments had not been raised in those cases. This principle could also extend to claims for discrimination based on race, sex, age, sexual orientation or religious belief, claims for equal pay or even claims relating to collective redundancies. In approaching each piece of legislation, tribunals will need to ask:

  1. whether the European legislation is sufficiently clear and precise to be capable of having direct effect;
  2. in the case of a private employer, whether the UK statute is capable of being interpreted harmoniously with the European legislation.

British employers with employees working abroad will find this case of concern as it enlarges the scope of claims which may now be made by overseas workers against them.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 29/01/2008.



Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More