UK: Flexible Working Requests: "It Fits My Childcare Arrangements!"

Last Updated: 25 November 2016
Article by Andrea Hunter

All employees who have at least 26 weeks' continuous employment have the right to make a request for flexible working. A request can be made for any reason but they are still most commonly made by women seeking flexibility to care for children.

So your employee is on maternity leave and out of the blue you receive a request from that employee to, on her return to work, reduce her hours to three days per week and to finish early on a Tuesday to accommodate her childcare arrangements. In your view, the company cannot possibly grant this request, but what do you do? Do you panic? Given the potential for an indirect sex discrimination claim, are alarm bells ringing?

Two recent decisions from the Employment Tribunal may provide some welcome relief. Whiteman v CPS Interiors Ltd and Ors, and Smith v Gleacher Shacklock LLP both related to a flexible working request ("FWR") made by an employee in advance of their return from maternity leave.

1. Whiteman v CPS Interiors Ltd

Lucy Whiteman worked for CPS Interiors as a CAD (computer aided design) designer. In advance of her return from maternity leave, she submitted a flexible working request ("FWR"). She had previously worked 9 to 5, Monday to Friday. She requested to reduce her hours to 20 hours per week. In addition, she proposed:

"to carry out all the CAD drawing work... from home to fit with looking after my 2 children, Monday-Sunday. Largely from 6pm every evening and at various other times during the day to fit with my partner Tim's shifts. I propose to come into the office at convenient times for both CPS management and myself to: take drawing/design briefs, discuss on-going projects, handover completed projects etc."

She also informed her employer that she had invested in "an all singing, all dancing new PC which has CAD software installed" to allow her to draw at home.

Fancy new PC aside, CPS Interiors had concerns with her proposals. They were prepared to grant her reduced hours, but were not prepared to permit her to work from home because:

  • CPS Interiors' collaborative way of working often involves designers together in a room looking at technical designs
  • Designs often have to be changed at short notice, something that would be difficult if the employee worked only at home in the evenings

Ms Whiteman resigned. She brought claims for breaches of the flexible working legislation, constructive dismissal and indirect sex discrimination.

The Tribunal rejected all of her claims, stressing that there is no right to work flexibly, only a right to request to work flexibly and to have that request dealt with in a reasonable manner.

The Tribunal went on to say that the onus is not on the employer to show that the request is impossible, or very difficult, to accommodate, as "an employer is entitled to run its business as it sees fit and is in the best position to assess what is in its own best interests..." Employers must follow the ACAS code of practice on handling FWRs, but, as long as their approach is not discriminatory, an employer can reject a FWR on one of the grounds specified in the legislation.

The Claimant's claim for indirect sex discrimination also failed. To succeed, she would have had to be able to show that there was a 'provision, criterion or practice' (known as a 'PCP') that her employer applied to all employees equally but which puts women at a particular disadvantage and which her employer could not objectively justify.  The Tribunal were not prepared to accept that not being able to work from home causes particular disadvantage to women over men, "at least not without any evidence."

2. Smith v Gleacher Shacklock LLP

Ms Smith was an Executive Assistant, working for a small investment banking firm. In advance of her return from maternity leave, she made a FWR to change her hours from full-time working, to working three days per week in the office, followed by homeworking on Thursdays and not working on Fridays.

Her requested was rejected for a number of reasons, including:

  • The impact on the firm's ability to look after its clients;
  • Unpredictability of the claimant's role;
  • Tight timescales for various tasks; and
  • Disproportionate pressure on others in the small team.

In evidence, the Respondent provided various "real" examples of recent situations where difficulties would have occurred had Ms Smith not been in the office.

In rejecting her claim for breach of the flexible working legislation, the Tribunal held that it does not have any power to interfere with the employer's business judgment. As long as they have considered the correct facts, it is for the employer to weigh those facts and analyse their impact on its business.

Her complaint of indirect sex discrimination was also not upheld.  In Ms Smith's case, the PCP in question - the requirement that roles such as the Claimant's be carried out full time by one employee - did not place Ms Smith at a particular disadvantage. It rejected her assertion that it placed "excessive demands on her time and energy", as such pressure is an "every-day reality" for parents.

The Tribunal went on to say that even if it was wrong in that regard, the employer had established a legitimate aim. The legitimate aim was to "ensure that its partners and clients received high quality, efficient secretarial support throughout the week, without problematic handovers between part time executive assistants." The refusal of her FWR was a proportionate means of achieving that legitimate aim.

Welcome relief?

On the face of it, these cases appear to be very good for employers. They show that FWRs by employees returning from maternity leave can be rejected. They emphasise that the right is simply to request to work flexibly, rather than a wider right to work flexibly whenever an employee feels that it is beneficial to them. They also highlight that the business reasons behind a decision to refuse are for the employer to decide, and the Tribunal are unlikely to interfere with the employer's judgment. An interesting point of the Smith case was the employer's ability to provide "real" examples of instances where, had the request been granted, it would have caused difficulties. Such examples may be useful to have to hand should you have to justify your decision to a Tribunal.

However, these are both non-binding, first instance decisions. Indirect discrimination is still something to be very much aware of when considering whether to grant a FWR. Smith shows that an employer can justify turning down such a FWR, although it is fact specific. Any employer considering rejecting a FWR must be prepared to justify it. The indirect discrimination claim in Whiteman failed, but this was due to a lack of evidence before the Tribunal. If an employee was able to provide evidence that, for example, preventing home working did cause a particular disadvantage to women over men, then a Tribunal may find that such a PCP is discriminatory.

The welcome relief we were looking for? Maybe not, but these cases do remind us of the fundamental points when faced by an FWR:

  • Handle FWRs in a "reasonable manner" (follow the ACAS guide)
  • Respond within the 3 month time limit
  • Make sure the reason for refusing the request is one of the specified reasons
  • Bear in mind that such a refusal may still be indirectly discriminatory, and be prepared to justify such a refusal

Flexible Working Requests: "It Fits My Childcare Arrangements!"

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions