UK: Health And Safety Newsletter – Autumn 2007

Last Updated: 13 November 2007
Article by Jan Burgess and Claire Kent

This edition of the Health and Safety newsletter covers the following:

  • The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
  • Metropolitan Police found guilty of Health and Safety breach
  • Headteacher fined £20,000 following death of three-year old
  • European Court of Justice Upholds UK’s Approach to Health & Safety Law
  • REACH - The New Chemical regime
  • Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999: Buncefield
  • HMA -v- ICL Tech Limited and ICL Plastics Limited – Stockline
  • HSE Falls from Vehicles Campaign
  • New Health and Safety Guidelines for Directors
  • New Smoking Laws
  • Macrory Review of Regulatory Penalties
  • Forthcoming Regulations 2007/8

To view the article in full, please see below:

Full Article

The Corporate Manslaughter And Corporate Homicide Act 2007

After almost ten years of consultation and debate, the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act finally received Royal Assent on 26 July 2007 and will come into force on 6 April 2008.

The Act creates a new statutory offence of corporate manslaughter (to be known as corporate homicide in Scotland), where a fatality is caused by the ‘gross breach’ of a duty of care, and where the actions of the company’s senior management played a ‘substantial’ part in the breach. ‘Gross breach’ will occur where there has been a failure to comply with health and safety law and where an organisation’s conduct falls far below what can reasonably be expected. Although the Act creates a new offence, it does not impose any new obligations on employers. The principal duties of employers will remain as before under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

The new offence is directed at the company itself as opposed to its individual managers or directors. Although a welcome relief to some, this will cause frustration to those who campaigned for individual liability. The Act is said by some to be "an unsatisfactory and uninspiring attempt to address the public outrage over apparent lack of accountability for workplace fatalities in a manner which will not be seen to stifle entrepreneurial activity or create a risk-averse culture".

The final version of the Act can be viewed at:

To view our full Law Now click here

Metropolitan Police Found Guilty Of Health And Safety Breach

On 1 November 2007 the Metropolitan police force was found guilty of breaching health and safety laws in the anti-terror operation that resulted in the shooting of an innocent Brazilian man who had been mistaken for a fugitive suicide bomber.

The police force was fined £175,000 for placing lives at risk in the operation that led to the death of Jean Charles de Menezes on July 22, 2005. The police (an Employer within the meaning of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974) were found to have failed to discharge their duties under section 3(1) of the Act, insofar as it failed to ensure that "persons not in its employment" (namely, members of the public, including Jean Charles de Menezes) were not exposed to risks to their health and safety.

The HSE had no responsibility for the prosecution in the De Menezes case. The Independent Police Complaints Commission investigated the circumstances of De Menezes’ death. Its evidence was passed to the Crown Prosecution Service ("CPS") who made the decision to take a prosecution under health and safety law.

Headteacher Fined £20,000 Following Death Of Three-Year Old

On 27 September 2007, James Porter, the headmaster of a private school, was fined £12,500 after being found guilty of health and safety breaches in relation to the death of a three-year old boy in his care. Mr Porter was also ordered to pay £7,500 in legal costs. Kian Williams banged his head, causing bleeding to the brain. He slipped into a coma and died five weeks later, after contracting an antibiotic-resistant strain of MRSA-related pneumonia.

Kian sustained severe head injuries after jumping off steps whilst unsupervised. The steps, while out of bounds to preschool children, had no physical barrier in place. There was only one teacher on duty at the time, looking after 59 pupils in the playground. This level of supervision was found to be inadequate. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) felt it was necessary to prosecute the school because of the "inadequate consideration for three-year-olds and potential dangers in their play area". The HSE argued that in this case there was an element of foreseeability: as headteacher, Mr Porter should have been aware that steps pose a risk to preschool children. The level of supervision should have reflected that.

The decision is expected to provoke further controversy over the "cotton wool culture" which teachers say is hindering their jobs. Teachers are under increasing pressure from health and safety legislation and the verdict and sentence may very well have serious consequences for the teaching profession as a whole.

Mr Porter was convicted under section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. He was prosecuted as the owner and proprietor of the school, rather than in his capacity as headteacher. Mr Porter is planning an appeal against his conviction.

European Court Of Justice Upholds UK’s Approach To Health & Safety Law

On 14 June 2007, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held in Commission v UK C-127/05 that the UK’s use of the expression "so far as is reasonably practicable", where it appears in UK Health and Safety law, was not inconsistent with the UK’s obligations under the Framework Directive 89/331.

The Commission argued that Article 5(1) of the Framework Directive 89/331 had been incorrectly transposed into UK law by use of the expression "so far as is reasonably practicable". It was argued that the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, in particular section 2(1), limited the employer’s duty to its employees by including this expression in the wording of the provisions.

The UK in response maintained that the expression was narrowly defined and thereby only allowed employers to escape liability where they could prove they had done everything reasonably practicable to avoid risks to the health and safety of workers.

Given the potentially far-reaching consequences that a decision against the UK could have created, the outcome of the case has been eagerly awaited by employers and insurers alike, and will no doubt be received with welcome relief. Although favourable to the UK, the case brings into sharp focus the current use of the defence of ‘reasonable practicality’ in the UK Courts and the basis on which such a defence might continue to be justified.

To view our full Law Now click here

REACH - The New Chemical Regime

REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) is the new European regulation on chemicals and their safe use. REACH (Regulation 1907/2006) came into force on 1 June 2007 and replaces and consolidates over 40 different laws in a single, unified regulatory system.

The primary objective of the new legislation is to protect the environment, consumers and employees by the safe management and control of chemicals. It is anticipated that REACH will have a significant impact on workplace safety and reduce the number of accidents, illnesses and fatalities caused by exposure to dangerous chemicals.

Between 1 June and 30 November 2008, manufacturers of chemicals will have to register what is anticipated to be some 30,000 substances with the central European Chemicals Agency. The registration process will require manufacturers to produce a set of standard data when registering their product. Failing to register a substance may prevent a manufacturer from making and supplying the substance to customers. Substances manufactured in quantities below 1 tonne per year will not require registration.

In conjunction with registration of chemicals, the Industry will have to prepare risk assessments and control measures for people using and coming into contact with the substances. It is thought that a list of "Substances of High Concern" (e.g. cancer causing chemicals or chemicals which remain in the environment for a long period of time) will be developed under REACH. For chemicals categorised in this way, supply and manufacturer will only be possible where authorisation has been obtained from the European Chemicals Agency.

Although REACH provides long awaited clarity and consolidation of legal requirements relating to chemicals, trade unions have suggested that it could have gone further. The specific example given is that the industry is still able to use hazardous substances, even if a safer alternative exists.

It should also be noted that REACH does not replace Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) or Chemicals (Hazard Information and Packaging for Supply) (CHIP) Regulations which will remain in full force and effect.

For more information go to:

For details of a REACH awareness event near you go to:

Control Of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999: Buncefield

On the 11 December 2005, a number of explosions occurred at the Hertfordshire Oil Storage Terminal, generally known as the Buncefield Oil Depot. The explosions were of massive proportions and fire engulfed a high proportion of the site. The fire burned for several days, destroying most of the site and emitting large clouds of black smoke into the atmosphere. Forty-three people were injured, but there were no fatalities. Significant damage occurred to both commercial and residential properties in the vicinity and a large area around the site was evacuated on emergency service advice.

A government inquiry held jointly by the HSE and the Environment Agency ("EA") is currently taking place. An initial progress report by the Major Incident Investigation Board (MIIB) on 13 July 2006 did not go into the causes of the explosion, but looked at the environmental impact. A statement from the Chairman of the Board, Lord Newton on 16 August 2007 makes it clear that there is still much research to be done, and that it is impossible to state clearly how much further research will be necessary to deliver sound guidance to the Industry.

Although the MIIB’s final report is not complete, the Buncefield Standards Task Group (BSTG) issued their final report into safety and environmental standards for fuel storage sites on 24 July 2007. Shortly after the incident, the BSTG was formed, consisting of representatives from the COMAH (Control of Major Accident Hazards) Competent Authority and from industry. The aim was to translate lessons from the Buncefield incident into effective and practical guidance for industry to implement as rapidly as possible. The purpose of the report is to specify the minimum expected standards of control which should be in place at all establishments storing large volumes of petroleum, and similar products capable of giving rise to a large flammable vapour cloud in the event of a loss of primary containment.

The report is available at

HMA -v- ICL Tech Limited And ICL Plastics Limited – Stockline

On 28 August 2007 the owner and operator of the ‘Stockline’ factory in Glasgow (which exploded in May 2004, killing nine people and injuring thirty-three) were fined £400,000 after admitting breaches of health and safety legislation.

The explosion was caused by a build-up of liquid petroleum gas (LPG), which leaked out of pipework installed in 1969. This may have ignited when an employee switched on a light in the basement. The court was told there had been no risk assessment or system for inspecting that stretch of pipework, which was originally above ground but had been buried in 1974. After the explosion, it was estimated that the cost of replacing the pipework would have been £405.

Lord Brodie of Glasgow High Court imposed a fine of £200,000 on ICL Tech and a further £200,000 on ICL Plastics Limited after both companies pled guilty to charges under sections 2 and 4, and sections 2 and 3 (respectively) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. Lord Brodie stressed that the fines could in no way compensate for the lives lost or injuries suffered in the explosion. He explained that he had to balance the fine against the companies’ intention to continue trading and to provide employment for the workforce.

A statement issued on behalf of the families affected by the blast branded the fine "inadequate" and concludes: " the current legal system is too restrictive…until company directors face personal prosecution for their negligence, families will never receive justice."

In early October, Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini announced that a full public inquiry is to be held over and above a Fatal Accident Inquiry (FAI). In terms of the Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths Inquiry (Scotland) Act 1976, a fatality at work gives rise to a mandatory FAI. However, if there is a sufficient airing of the facts during the course of the public inquiry, the Procurator Fiscal may apply to the Lord Advocate for ‘special dispensation’ not to hold the FAI.

A public inquiry is an official review of events or actions ordered by a Government Minister. Health and Safety is a reserved matter under the Scotland Act 1998. However, given that the incident took place in Scotland, both Scottish and UK Ministers will be responsible for its investigation. The hearing will therefore be the first joint inquiry to be held under the Inquiries Act 2005.

HSE Falls From Vehicles Campaign

A new campaign has been launched by the HSE to try to reduce injury and fatalities caused by workplace falls from vehicles. The campaign is set to run until December 2007. There will be a particular focus on the construction industry, which has been in the spotlight recently with the new Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007. In conjunction with the strict safety regime that has been set down in these Regulations, through focussed visits and spot checks on construction sites, it is hoped that falls from vehicles can be reduced and overall health and safety in the industry improved. The construction industry has received a lot of attention in recent years due to its high accident, injury and fatalities rates. Until the HSE are satisfied that these figures are being controlled by the industry, the industry is likely to remain a focus point for some time to come.

For further information regarding the HSE campaign go to:

To view the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 go to:

New Health And Safety Guidelines For Directors

On 29 October, the Health and Safety Commission (HSC) and the Institute of Directors published new guidelines known as "Leading Health and Safety at Work".

The guidelines attempt to draw to the attention of directors the importance of good health and safety practices and procedures in the workplace – often dismissed as a hindrance to productivity. The guidance takes a common sense approach, offering straightforward practical advice relating to health and safety in the workplace. The short (eight-page) publication provides a summary of legal liabilities, a checklist of key questions for leaders and a list of resources and references for implementing the guidance in detail.

The guidelines are available in full at:

For further guidance please also go to

To view our law now in full click here

New Smoking Laws

The smoking ban come into force in Scotland on 26 March 2006. With a smoking ban effective from 2 April 2007 in Wales, and 1 July 2007 in England, all public places and workplaces have now become ‘smoke-free’.

Although the HSE is not responsible for enforcing the legislation, it will "fully support Local Authority Officers, both in raising employers’ awareness of their responsibilities and in encouraging employers and employees to comply with the new legislation".

It is worth noting that a few exemptions to the law have been made, including smoking in offshore installations. Nothing in the new law, however, obliges an employer or manager of exempted premises to permit smoking or to provide a smoking area.

The Government has produced an official guide, explaining the new legislation and what must be done to comply with it. Additional guidance leaflets are also available for both businesses and individuals, along with supporting materials.

These can be downloaded from the Smoke-Free England Website:

Further information relating to the Scottish smoking ban can be found at

To view our full Law Now click here

Macrory Review Of Regulatory Penalties

The final report of the Macrory Review of Regulatory Penalties "Regulatory Justice – Making Sanctions Effective" was published in November 2006. The Government commissioned the review as part of its radical programme of regulatory reform. The review considered a broad spectrum of sanctions as well as the major motivations for non–compliance, including non-compliance with health and safety legislation. Rather than relying on criminal sanctions, Macrory recommended use of administrative and other non-criminal penalties.

The Government accepted the recommendations of the report in full, and intends to take forward four key recommendations by way of Part 2 of the draft Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill. This was published for consultation in May 2007. Part 2 of the Bill provides for Monetary Penalties (fixed and variable), Discretionary Requirements, Cessation Notices and Enforcement Undertakings to be made available as a "menu of sanctioning powers" to regulators who can show themselves to be compliant with the Macrory principles of regulatory enforcement.

The Government states that it will continue to look at how the other recommendations proposed in the Macrory Review can best be taken forward.

The report can be found in full if you click here

If you have any problems opening or printing the pdf file above, please click here for help

A summary of the recommendations can be found at:
Summary of recommendations

Part 2 of the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill can be found at:
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions draft Bill – Government response

Forthcoming Regulations 2007/8

Following various consultations and pilot schemes, the decision was taken in 2005 by the HSE to implement changes in health and safety law on only two dates each year. This is extended to legislation arising from Europe.

The HSE will update their ‘statement of forthcoming regulations’ every six months, on 6 April and 1 October each year.

Changes commencing on 1 October 2007 can be found at:

The hope is that harmonisation of commencement dates will ensure that those affected by the changes are more aware of, and better able to plan for and implement the new measures.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 07/11/2007.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.