UK: Death By A Thousand Cuts? Court Of Appeal Refers Trade Mark Dilution Questions To ECJ

Last Updated: 24 July 2007
Article by Lucy Harrold

In the recent decision of Intel Corporation Inc v CPM United Kingdom Limited1, the Court of Appeal referred certain questions to the European Court of Justice, asking to what extent brands with a huge reputation should be protected against trade mark ‘dilution’. At the same time the Court expressed its own view that a narrow interpretation of the concept is to be preferred.


This is an appeal by Intel Corporation ("Intel") from a High Court decision of Patten J on 26 July 2006 (which in turn was an appeal from a Trade Marks Registry decision of Mr Reynolds) on the issue of the registrability of word mark ‘Intelmark’, registered in class 35 for "marketing and telemarketing services."

The High Court held that Intel has a huge reputation in the word mark ‘Intel’ for microprocessor products and multi-media and business software. Even though end consumers generally do not purchase from Intel directly, many computer manufacturers use the slogan ‘Intel Inside’ which has contributed to the reputation of the mark, such that anyone seeing the mark will associate it with Intel. Intel has a large number of registrations all related to computer goods and services and all dissimilar to the services of the disputed mark. The disputed mark, ‘Intelmark’, was decided below to have been unused at the date of registration.

Legal issues

On appeal from the Registry to the High Court, Patten J held that "the reputation enjoyed by the INTEL mark would be sufficient for the average consumer to focus on INTEL in INTELMARK at least so as to bring to mind the INTEL mark" (para.42). The issues on appeal to the Court of Appeal were:

  1. Is the mere "bringing to mind" of an earlier mark with a reputation enough to prevent a later registration? And
  2. Is it an infringement of a registered mark which has a reputation if a defendant uses (for dissimilar goods or services) a mark which merely "brings to mind" the registered mark?

In his leading decision, Jacob LJ set out Articles 4(4)(a) (relating to registrability) and 5(2) (relating to infringement) of the Trade Marks Directive 89/104 and summarised the issue before him as "whether Intel’s registrations for dissimilar goods preclude use of the Intelmark for CPM’s dissimilar services."

He briefly reviewed the relevant European case law, quoting Advocate-General Jacobs’ summary of the concept of trade mark ‘dilution’ in Adidas-Salomon v Fitness World ([2004] FSR 21). Pursuant to Article 5(2) the Advocate-General stated: "there are thus in principle four types of use which may be caught: use which takes unfair advantage of the marks’ distinctive character, use which takes unfair advantage of its repute, use which is detrimental to the mark’s distinctive character and use which is detrimental to its repute." Dilution itself (as articulated in the case of Schechter) is "the gradual whittling away or dispersion of the identity and hold upon the public mind" of certain marks. Thus Advocate-General Jacobs stated that "the essence of dilution in this classic sense is that the blurring of the distinctiveness of the trade mark means that it is no longer capable of arousing immediate association with the goods for which it is registered and used." ‘Detriment’ he defined as the situation where "the goods for which the infringing sign is used appeal to the public’s senses in such a way that the trade mark’s power of attraction is affected." The ECJ in the Adidas case was, however, not concerned with dissimilar goods. It held in the context of Article 5(2) that if, on the facts, the mark was seen by the public as an embellishment and as having a "link" to the trade mark, then that was enough to amount to infringement.

In the present case, Intel argued that a "link" was a mere "bringing to mind" of the earlier mark and that the stronger the earlier mark’s distinctive character and reputation; the easier it is to accept that detriment has occurred. Intel also argued it was important to stop any encroachment on the mark at the outset or it would "suffer death by a thousand cuts". Intel further argued that the Court of First Instance appeared to accept Advocate- General Jacobs’ definition of ‘dilution’ by applying it in various dissimilar goods cases and that the UK national decisions on the point are wrong (e.g Premier Brands v Typhoon Europe [2000] FSR 767 which held that Article 5(2) does not enable the proprietor of a well-known registered mark to object as a matter of course to the use of a sign which may remind people of his mark). National cases also suggest that the later mark should have (or be likely to have) an effect on consumers’ economic behaviour before it can be said to infringe or be barred from registration.

Court of Appeal Judgment

The Court of Appeal (Jacob LJ, Keene LJ and Mummery LJ) referred three questions to the ECJ and Jacob LJ offered his own view on each as follows:

1. For the purposes of Article 4(4)(a) where:

  1. the earlier mark has a huge reputation for certain specific types of goods/services
  2. those goods/services are dissimilar or dissimilar to a substantial degree to the goods/services of the later mark
  3. the earlier mark is unique in respect of any goods/services
  4. the earlier mark would be brought to mind by the average consumer when he/she encounters the later mark used for the services of the later mark.

Are those facts sufficient in themselves to establish a "link" and/or unfair advantage and/or detriment within the meaning of the Article?

In Jacob LJ’s view, ‘no’; "I would hold that a link requires more than such a tenuous association between the two marks". A trade mark with such a reputation, he states, ought to be strong enough to withstand a "mere bringing to mind". Any confusion as to trade connection should be sufficient. If a consumer wonders whether there is a connection and that wonder is "substantial as opposed to fleeting" that might also be sufficient. He also comments that the distinctive character of a mark is tied to the goods/services for which it is registered.

2. If no, what factors should the national court take into account in deciding whether such is sufficient? What significance is to be attached to the goods/services in the specification of the later mark?

Jacob LJ suggests two factors: a whether, having regard to the nature of the goods/services for which the later mark is used, the average consumer would consider there is an economic connection between the owners of the two marks; and b whether the distinctiveness or repute of the earlier mark for the goods/services for which it is registered is really likely to be affected if the later mark is used for the specific goods/services covered by its registration.

3. In the context of Article 4(4)(a), what is required in order to satisfy the condition of detriment to distinctive character? Specifically, (i) does the earlier mark have to be unique? (ii) is a first conflicting use sufficient to establish detriment to distinctive character and (iii) does the element of ‘detriment’ require an effect on the economic behaviour of the consumer?

Jacob LJ proposes a "realistic global appreciation of the position" including whether the "pulling power" of the earlier mark for its specific goods/services is really likely to be affected by the use of the later mark for its specific goods/service and whether the later mark is likely to get a real commercial advantage from the reputation of the earlier mark.

Commercial implications

Trade mark owners will have to wait some considerable time for the ECJ to opine on the questions referred and, in the meantime, the position on registrability and infringement in cases of brands with a huge reputation and disputed marks for dissimilar goods/services will remain unclear. The Court of Appeal would like any concept of ‘dilution’ to be curtailed so that it only applies in circumstances where the earlier mark is "really likely to be affected" by the use of the later mark and, in particular, where some commercial advantage will be secured or there is some change in the economic behaviour of the consumers. This is a narrower concept than that developed in the USA where greater protection is provided against the blurring or "insidious gnawing away at" a trade mark by use in relation to dissimilar goods/services. In Jacob LJ’s view, "A mere possibility or assertion of damage is just too remote and would leave trade mark owners in too monopolistic a position." Many companies invest heavily in their brands and understandably wish to protect them from erosion. It will be left to the ECJ to demarcate the scope of ‘dilution’ to achieve the right commercial balance between fair competition and registered trade mark rights.


1 [2007] EWCA Civ 431, 15 May 2007

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.