UK: The Government Finally Reveals Its Intentions For The Reform Of The Adjudication And Payment Provisions Within The Construction Act

Last Updated: 21 June 2007
Article by Jeremy Glover

It was probably some three years ago that people first began seriously to talk about possible changes to the Housing Grants Construction & Regeneration Act 1996 ("HGCRA"). Several consultations later and the government’s plan to improve construction payment practices has been launched. Although the launch is by way of a further consultation process, given the short period of time given for responses, until 17 September 2007, it seems likely that these changes will be implemented fairly soon. We say no more than that because the government has made it clear that legislation to implement the proposals emerging from this consultation will be introduced only as soon as Parliamentary time allows.

The government proposals seek to introduce greater clarity and transparency into the statutory payment framework and to encourage parties to resolve disputes by adjudication. The key changes are as follows:

(i) Adjudication:

  • The legislation will apply to oral and partly oral contracts and not just contracts evidenced in writing;
  • The use of agreements that interim payment decisions will be conclusive is to be prevented; and
  • Costs are to be fairly allocated

(ii) Payment

  • The duplication of payment notices is unnecessary and to be brought to an end;
  • The need to serve a section 110(2) payment notice is to be clarified;
  • The content of payment and withholding notices is to be made clearer and must include details of any set-off or abatement;
  • The prohibition of pay when certified clauses

(iii) Suspension

  • The statutory right to suspend performance is to be improved by allowing the suspending party to claim the costs and delay which result from any valid suspension.

Contracts in writing

This is perhaps the most radical change. It is also the most surprising as it was not something which had been highlighted in previous consultation papers. This was even though there had been many who wanted changes to the legislation following the Court of Appeal decision in RJT Consulting Engineers Ltd v DM Engineering (Northern Ireland Ltd) [2002] EWCA Civ 270 where the majority had held that section 107 of the HGCRA meant that all the essential terms of the contract needed to be in writing or evidenced in writing. However the call for change had to be balanced against the recognition concisely expressed by HHJ Bowsher QC in Grovedeck Ltd v Capital Demolition Ltd [2000] EWHC 139 (TCC) that:

"Disputes as to the terms, express and implied, of oral construction agreements are surprisingly common and are not readily susceptible of resolution by a summary procedure such as adjudication."

The difficulties caused by the RJT case can be seen in the recent decision of HHJ Wilcox who decided that the letter of intent in the case of Bennett (Electrical) Services Ltd v Inviron Ltd [2007] EWHC 49 (TCC) failed to comply with the requirements of section 107. However he also commented on the difference of opinion of the Court of Appeal in the RJT case noting that:

"…The reasoning of Auld LJ is attractive because at the subcontractor level and where cash flow difficulties are likely to be encountered in the smaller projects, the paperwork is rarely comprehensive. The extent of the requirement for recording contractual terms for an agreement to qualify under section 107 laid down by majority could have the effect of excluding from the scheme a significant number of those whom the Act was perhaps intended to assist."

The government’s response is to follow the Australian and New Zealand approach and extend the HGCRA to contracts which are agreed wholly in writing, only partly in writing, entirely orally or varied by oral agreement. In other words, this removes the restriction of the application of the HGCRA to contracts in writing. However, if a contract does not set out provisions relating to a contractual adjudication scheme in writing, then as a default, the Scheme provisions will apply.

The driving force behind this change is that the "evidenced in writing" requirement was found to be acting as a barrier to the referral of disputes. The consultation paper noted that research by TeCSA has found that of 154 recent enforcement cases, 15% related to whether the construction contract was evidenced in writing or not. Given the government’s aim to extend the ambit of adjudication, the proposed extension of section 107 is a natural one. It will be interesting to see whether, the next time TeCSA carry out a similar survey, a large percentage of the disputes will revolve around what constituted the contract between the parties.

Interim Payment

The next change is that any agreement that a decision will be conclusive as to the amount of an interim payment will be deemed to be ineffective. Research had shown that some 15% of contracts provided for conclusive decisions in relation to interim payments. Accordingly, as this was felt to be a means of avoiding the referral of interim payment disputes to adjudication, in accordance with the government aims, such agreements had to go.


Here, the government is proposing to include new statutory provisions so that the following agreements are only valid if made in writing and after the appointment of the adjudicator:-

(i) Agreements that one party should pay the whole or part of the costs of the adjudication;

(ii) Agreements that the adjudicator may make a decision that a party should pay the whole or part of the costs of the adjudication

This is designed to prevent contractual provisions requiring the referring party to pay the costs of adjudication, a clear disincentive to commencing the adjudication process. Where a valid agreement has been made as described above, the adjudicator will be able to award only a reasonable amount in respect of costs reasonably incurred by the parties and, in respect of his fees, such reasonable amount as relates to the work undertaken and expenses incurred. Notwithstanding this, the parties shall remain jointly and severally liable for the adjudicator’s reasonable fees and expenses. Interestingly, a combined DTi/CIC survey of adjudicators suggested that the average adjudicator’s fees and expenses are approximately £5,000 per referral.

As the above provisions will be enshrined in statute, the government intends to remove all provisions about costs Part I of the Scheme, namely paragraphs 11 and 25, which entitle an adjudicator to his fees if his appointment is revoked or when he ultimately decides the dispute.


The problem with the section 110(2) notice, which sets out payments made or proposed to be made, was that under most contracts, the information in the notice tended to repeat the information already contained in the certificate. The government is therefore proposing that in order to prevent this unnecessary duplication, a notice or certificate from a third party can act as a section 110(2) payment notice.

That said, it is also intended to amend section 110 to make it clear that a payment notice is always required if a payment would have become due under the contract. This will be the case even where there is no obligation to make any payment because the work has not been carried out or it has been set off or subject to abatement. Payment notices are seen by the government as an important tool in communicating details of payments which are made or are proposed to be made.

Further, the government intends to introduce clarity as to the content of the payment and withholding notices under sections 110 and 111. The proposal is that the payer must set out in a payment notice the amount (if any) that he is paying or proposes to pay. Where there is more than one ground, the payer will be required to set out each ground and the amount attributable to that ground. Although this might not seem new, you will be required to include details of any set-off or abatement, something which is currently not always thought to be necessary. The government is intending to achieve transparency about what constitutes the sum due.

Finally, the government intends to prohibit pay when certified clauses. This is to ensure that a certificate covering work under one contract cannot act as a mechanism to determine the timing of payment for work done under another.


The problem with the right to suspend was that the compensation to which the suspending party is entitled under the legislation in the event of a legitimate suspension was not generous. The suspending party was merely entitled to an extension of time for completion of the works covering the period during which performance is suspended. That extension would not necessarily extend to the 7-day notice period prior to the right to suspend becoming operative nor would it apply to the time which it takes to re-mobilise following the suspension. This is important since the right to suspend ceases on payment of the amount "due" in full.

There was nothing to prevent the parties from conferring more extensive rights through the terms of the contract than the legislation provides. By way of example, clauses 25.4.17 and 26.2.9 of the JCT With Contractor’s Design 98 form entitles the contractor to apply for both extensions of time in respect of "delay arising from a suspension…" and for "loss and expense where appropriate, provided the suspension was not frivolous or vexatious." However there was nothing to insist that the parties did this.

The government intends to make the right to spend performance a more effective remedy. Thus the party need not suspend all its obligations to the party in default and the government will provide a statutory right of compensation for any reasonable losses caused by the suspension. These costs may include damage to materials while clearing the site, storage charges, management costs and the cost of retaining sub contract labour and hired plant and equipment. The aim is to make the right of suspension more accessible and effective.

A Coda

The government has also considered the recent House of Lords case of Melville Dundas v Wimpey. From a policy perspective, the government considers that section 111 should not apply in cases of insolvency. Thus, the government agrees with the House of Lords. However, section 111 should apply in all other cases. In other words, the Melville Dundas case should be construed narrowly on its own facts.

Of course there remain two unknowns. Will all these proposed changes actually be implemented and if so, when? That remains to be seen.

Full details of the proposed changes can be found on the DTi website at

This article is based on an article from a forthcoming issue of the Fenwick Elliott Dispatch, a monthly newsletter which summarises recent key developments relating to contentious and non-contentious construction law issues. To see the current issue please visit

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jeremy Glover
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions