UK: What’s In Store? Supply, Demand And Storage Issues In The UK Gas Market

Last Updated: 11 May 2007
Article by Deloitte Energy & Resources Group

Most Read Contributor in UK, August 2017


With declining North Sea gas production, the UK is now a net importer of gas, receiving supplies from an increasingly diverse set of countries. It is estimated that by 2016, 80% of gas consumed in the UK will have to be imported. Traditionally, the UK has relied heavily on the flexibility of its own offshore supplies in order to balance supply and demand, supplemented by offshore gas storage, some peak shaving LNG terminals (which supplement the normal amounts of gas delivered to customers during peak-use periods) and a very limited amount of salt cavity storage.

Major new import projects including the Langeled and BBL pipelines came on stream in October and December 2006 respectively and a number of large LNG terminals are being built. These new sources of supply are undoubtedly capable of providing substantial additional gas to the UK, but the question is whether they will be able to provide the flexibility required in the marketplace. Another related question is how these additional sources of gas supply might change the structure of the gas market in such a way as to affect the volatility of gas prices on a day-to-day and seasonal basis, and hence reduce the chances of attracting new capital into building additional storage capacity.

On 16th May 2006, the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry issued a ‘Statement on Need for Additional Gas Supply Infrastructure’, which affirmed "the clear national need for new gas storage infrastructure". This has created a great deal of interest in the issues surrounding development of new storage in the UK, and the potential financial returns available on such projects.

UK gas market

Gas demand

The UK is one of the largest gas markets in Europe with total gas demand of 99 bcm (billion cubic metres) in 2006. Despite the relative maturity of the market, total demand in the UK has risen by an average of 5.5% per annum over the past decade, driven especially by the large increase in gas fired power generation in the 1990s. In its Ten Year Statement, National Grid (NG) envisages a growth rate of 2.2% per annum in gas demand between 2005 and 2014/15. Gas demand growth in the following years will be influenced by Government policy regarding nuclear plant and renewables – continuation of existing policies will see further growth until 2030. The power generation sector is expected to continue to have the greatest impact on growth in UK gas demand over the next decade, and gas’s share of the generation market is likely to continue its rapid growth for environmental and commercial reasons. The onset of nuclear decommissioning beyond 2010 and the introduction of Phase II of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme will create a significant further requirement for new, low carbon, generating plant, much of which is expected to be gas-fired. The rate of growth of renewable energy and the Large Combustion Plant Directive are also likely to play a role. No new nuclear plant is expected to be on stream prior to 2018/2020. Modest gas demand growth is also expected in the industrial and residential sectors.

Gas demand is highly seasonal (for example, in the residential sector, on average, five times more gas is needed on a winter day than a summer day), and demand varies from day to day. To meet this varying demand, considerable flexibility is required in gas supply.

Gas supply

The rate of decline of UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) gas production is likely to depend mainly on the development of alternative sources of supply and the costs of extracting gas from remaining smaller fields, relative to the price of imported supplies.

NG has forecast that an increasing proportion of future supply is likely to come in the form of LNG imports. However, LNG demand in the UK will have to compete with demand from existing and new LNG terminals in the US and Europe, within the wider Atlantic Basin LNG market.

These peak day supply and demand forecasts indicate that LNG and storage will play an increasingly important peak day balancing role. If all projects go ahead as planned then not all projects will have to operate at full capacity.

However, while all of the gas supply projects are designed to be flexible, none will run at full capacity on an annual basis. For example:

  • Norway can divert gas from Langeled to Continental Europe via Zeepipe;
  • LNG can be diverted from the UK to the US (many LNG terminals around the world tend only to operate at about 60% of capacity); and
  • the Interconnector can flow both ways; however it does not operate as a regulated Third Party Access (TPA) system and, in the 2006 Budget, Ofgem was granted the power to investigate whether its operation is satisfactory. This was due to perceptions amongst large UK gas consumers that it does not always supply all the gas that it could on days of maximum demand in the UK.

The Government’s recent Energy Review (July 2006) noted the discrepancy between the amount of storage in the UK and that available in Continental Europe and the US – as a percentage of annual production the UK has a comparably very low storage capacity (Table 1). Having said that, some of the storage in other markets is maintained for strategic security of supply reasons, rather than purely as commercial, seasonal or daily storage.

Managing flexibility and security of supply

UK balancing

In order to keep gas supply and demand in balance on a daily basis, apart from buying and selling gas in the "On The Day" commodity market, the transmission and distribution system operators and individual licensed gas companies make use of a number of techniques to maintain the levels of security of supply within their licence conditions, essentially to be able to meet the coldest day in 20 years and the worst winter in 50 years. Base load is supplemented by:

  • "swing" from offshore fields (ie, the ratio of peak to annual average flows and requires oversized facilities and gas transmission systems);
  • peak shaving facilities, using excess delivery capacity. There are two main ways this can be done:

– using high swing offshore gas fields like Sean or Morecambe. Until quite recently Sean was used to supply gas on only a few days each year; and

– the use of LNG peak shaving facilities like Glenmavis: these facilities usually have much less storage capacity than large baseload LNG terminals and are designed typically to supply gas at high delivery rates for just five to eight days at a time. They are situated on the coast at the extremities of the gas market;

  • line pack in transmission lines (which would only last a matter of hours or days, depending on the circumstances, before parts of the transmission and distribution systems dropped to low pressures that are unsafe); and
  • interruption, both voluntarily, under supply contracts that have already allowed for some degree of interruption and where the gas is priced accordingly, or involuntarily, where the transmission system operator or supplier curtails the supply of gas unilaterally.

Swing can provide the equivalent of long-term storage and the day-ahead characteristics of short-term storage subject to nomination procedures. However, swing cannot provide the equivalent of the in-day characteristics of short-term storage without changes to nomination procedures or provide corresponding services to interruption, line pack or the local storage of LNG.

Regulation of gas storage in the UK

The commercial framework for storage services in the UK is determined by the Universal Network Code. In 1998 Rough (a depleted field) and Hornsea (a salt cavity facility) were moved out of regulation onto a commercial contract basis with capacity and prices set by auction. Capacity at Rough is sold subject to a number of conditions which were laid down by the Competition Commission in August 2003 following the acquisition of Rough by Centrica. This limits the maximum Rough storage capacity that Centrica can reserve for its own gas supply business.

The second European Gas Directive permitted gas storage to be operated on a negotiated or regulated access basis depending on the wishes of each member state. The European Gas Regulatory Forum (known as the Madrid Forum) has been pressing for new EU-wide rules on access to storage and implementation of the voluntary Guidelines for Good TPA Practice for Storage Operators (GGPSSO) (for example that unused capacity has to be released under a "use it or lose it" mechanism). So far this code has not been adopted in the UK for storage.

Until 2004 NG managed UK security of supply through "top up arrangements" to meet the 1 in 50 winter condition referred to above. In 2004 safety monitors were implemented, requiring NG to monitor gas levels in storage, to act if volumes fall below the prescribed levels for each facility, and to ensure adequate pressure throughout the network. The safety monitors take account of possible diversion of LNG supplies away from the UK. NG no longer has the right to interrupt end users when demand is above 85% of the peak day demand.

Types of storage system

There are broadly three types of gas storage: previously depleted gas and oil fields, salt cavities and aquifers. The two types described below are the most significant in the UK context.

Depleted gas and oil fields

One of the cheapest ways of storing gas (on a unit cost basis) is the usage of a partially depleted gas or oil field. To be suitable for this purpose, depleted reservoir formations must have high permeability and porosity. The porosity of the formation determines the amount of natural gas that it may hold, and the permeability determines the rate at which natural gas flows through the formation, which in turn determines the rate of injection and withdrawal of working gas. About 50 to 60% of gas initially in place must be retained as "cushion gas" to maintain reservoir pressure and cannot be extracted whilst the field is being used for storage. Depleted fields tend to be used for seasonal, rather than short-term, storage.

Salt cavities

There are two possible forms of salt cavity storage: salt domes and salt beds.

Salt domes are thick underground geological formations created from natural salt deposits that leach up through overlying sedimentary layers to form large dome-type structures. Salt beds tend to be shallower, thinner formations and are usually no more than 1,000 feet in height. As salt beds are wide and thin formations they are more prone to deterioration when used for storage, as compared with salt domes. In addition, they may also be more expensive to develop.

Salt cavity storage can be used to modulate gas much faster than depleted gas reservoirs or aquifers. Gas can be cycled a dozen or more times a year, catering for "needle peaks" in demand closer to end user markets. Hence the unit deliverability costs can be comparable to larger, depleted field storage, but bulk storage costs are usually higher. Salt cavity storage is commercially viable when there is high volatility of gas prices and where very sharp demand peaks need to be met in nearby demand centres.

UK gas prices

Summer/winter UK gas price spreads

The value of storage capacity is driven by "within year" gas price differentials and not directly by the absolute levels of gas prices. The main commercial driver for seasonal storage is the differential between summer and winter gas prices. Forward spreads (taken here as the difference between average Q3 and Q1 prices) have varied significantly over the six year period 2001-2006. The following chart shows the forward spread as at January of each year for the following summer (Figure 2).

The eventual realised spreads have shown a similar pattern over this period, but have tended to be smaller than those in the forward curve.

Short-term gas price volatility

The volatility of gas market prices from day to day is the key factor in determining the economic viability of medium-term storage such as salt cavities. Access to storage creates a series of options to sell gas on a daily basis with varying delays. The option to sell creates value during periods of high prices, while the option to buy does so during periods of low prices. Historical gas prices show significant and highly variable levels of "within month" volatility (Figure 3).

Particularly volatile months were caused by cold winters in 2005 and 2006 coinciding with shortages in supply (see Box 1).

Box 1 Comments from Ofgem on winter 2005/06 prices:

November 2005
"Gas storage was used heavily because beach (UK and Norwegian offshore gas) supplies, Interconnector and Isle of Grain were not delivering the expected amount of gas. This combined with unseasonably cold weather."

February 2006
"Rough gas storage facility was closed following a fire on February 16. The market responded with increasing supplies, particularly from the Interconnector."

March 2006
"Low temperatures combined with the continued closure of Rough and lower than expected volumes of gas, particularly from beach supplies and the Interconnector."

New storage project opportunities


In response to increased demand for storage and the UK’s historically low level of storage compared with other markets of similar size, a number of new schemes have been proposed (Table 2).

Table 2. UK gas storage projects

An additional 7.6 bcm of UK storage capacity is being planned





(Storage capacity)

Commissioning date

Planning status


Salt cavity

Statoil SSE

420 Mcm

Q3 2007



Salt cavity

E.ON (Scottish Power contracted)

170 Mcm



Hole House Extension

Salt cavity


20 Mcm


Under construction


Depleted field

Warwick Energy

210 Mcm

Q3 2008

Planning application refused –appeal lodged


Depleted field


715 Mcm

Q4 2008

Planning application submitted, January 2006 – awaiting outcome


Salt cavity

INEOS Enterprises

540 Mcm


Under construction

Albury Phase 1

Depleted field

Star Energy

160 Mcm



Albury Phase 2

Depleted field

Star Energy

Up To 715 Mcm




Depleted field

Star Energy

900 Mcm




Depleted field

Star Energy

220 Mcm




Depleted field

Star Energy

435 Mcm


Local planning refused, 1965 Gas Act, application to be submitted


Depleted field


1700 Mcm


Pending outcome of public inquiry


Salt cavity


1000 Mcm




Salt cavity


420 Mcm


Planning submitted Jan 07


7,626 Mcm

Source: Deloitte Petroleum Services

There are around a dozen storage projects under active discussion, including both salt cavity and depleted fields, and there are several other schemes on the drawing board that have not yet been publicly announced. The projects under construction (Aldbrough and Byley) will introduce incremental capacity of 0.5 bcm by 2009. If all proposed projects are completed then UK storage volumes could exceed 11 bcm by 2011/12, a level that might lead to some redundant capacity.

Several of the schemes have faced serious planning delays, a problem that may be addressed by the 2007 Energy White Paper and the prospective Energy Bill. Nevertheless, all schemes continue to face considerable planning, market and regulatory uncertainties.

There are several potential opportunities to re-develop UKCS gas fields as offshore storage as many that are severely depleted face imminent decommissioning. These include several of the original large Southern North Sea fields that have supplied the UK mainland with natural gas since the 1960s and 1970s. The possibility of staving off the huge costs of decommissioning by converting these fields to storage use might potentially be attractive to the owners/ operators of these facilities and the associated transportation systems, despite the cost of purchasing cushion gas. Not all gas-inplace can be extracted from a gas field economically; typically 10-15% of gas will remain in the reservoir and this becomes part of the cushion gas when the field is converted to storage.

However, the suitability of the infrastructure to which these fields are connected to act as part of a storage system is more problematic. Whilst the fields may have started out with dedicated infrastructure, to avoid proliferation of pipelines many joint facilities have typically been used to transport the gas from nearby fields to shore. In some cases they have developed into major gas gathering systems. These facilities and the associated compressors are not in general set up to pump gas back into depleted field storage during the summer, (ie, against the flow of other gas in the system), or necessarily to release the stored gas to shore in much larger flows during the winter. Gas storage also requires different processing and compression facilities.

There is yet another level of complexity as third party gas on joint infrastructure systems is transported according to strict commercial rules, with capacity dedicated to individual shippers under long-term transportation agreements. This means that pipeline capacity cannot readily be made available for storage use, if so doing would adversely affect other shippers.

Long-term investment signals

The largest storage scheme in the UK is the offshore Rough field, which can deliver 10% of peak gas demand and represents 80% of storage capacity. When the original gas field was converted, new wells were required, expensive offshore compression was installed and capacity increased to offer much greater deliverability. It is estimated that it would cost £1-1.5b to develop an equivalent storage field nowadays. For a scheme as large as Rough, it might cost a further £1-1.5b to fill the reservoir with cushion gas if it were wholly depleted. If producible gas is still in the reservoir, then it could become cushion gas, but its market value would have to be deferred as it could not be produced until the gas storage system is eventually closed down and emptied.

It can be difficult to extract reliable investment signals for new long-term investment in storage infrastructure from a liberalised market, like that for UK gas. This was the subject of much debate when the new gas trading rules were introduced by Ofgem in 1999.

Our calculations indicate that a new large "Rough" type storage scheme would require a market price of at least 45p/standard bundled unit (SBU – each SBU comprises 1 kWh of deliverability, 0.110769 kWh of injectability and 17.948718 kWh of capacity), excluding the cost of cushion gas, to break even economically. But, prices dropped from 51p/SBU for 2007 to below 40p/SBU in mid-2006. Accordingly, if these SBU price levels persist, investment in strategic storage might not be economically justified as a worthwhile use of incremental capital.

Summary and conclusions

At least a dozen new storage project proposals are under discussion, and several more are at an early planning stage. Many of these schemes are situated onshore and some have been subject to extended planning approval delays because of local concerns about environmental impact. If all the projects go ahead then the UK could have up to 11 bcm of storage, potentially creating an oversupply. New storage projects face planning, market and regulatory risks and it is expected that these issues will be addressed in the Government’s Energy White Paper and Energy Bill.

At a time when there is increasing concern about long-term security of energy supply to the UK, it is apparent that the costs of developing a new strategic storage system, such as another Rough, that is capable of coping with a major imported gas disruption are huge, £2-3b including the cost of filling the storage system with cushion gas. The market risk could also be considerable, given the potential for an oversupply of peak day gas storage in the UK if all the planned import and storage schemes were to operate at, or near, design capacity.

Although there is likely to be increasing geographical diversity of supply of gas to the UK, the gas supplied through import pipelines will be concentrated in very few large players. LNG supply is no longer all locked into specific trade routes in the way it used to be, and at least some LNG can be diverted at short notice to other markets if they are prepared to pay higher prices. Moreover, whatever progress there may be in the future towards establishing a more harmonised gas market across Europe, if supply were to become tight, Continental European gas companies may not be prepared (or permitted) to send gas to the UK market if there is a risk of supply shortfall to customers on the Continent.

Having said that, the ability to switch from gas to coal or oil does provide some insurance against long-term gas supply disruptions, and also exposure to unduly high gas prices; and there is some additional short-term buffering against interruptions in supply due to the storage inherent in LNG supply chains.

Nevertheless, to ensure the UK has satisfactory long-term gas supply capacities in place, now may be the time for Government to reassess, and gain consensus on, the gas industry’s contingency plans and the fundamentals of the future shape of the UK gas supply system. If private sector storage schemes do not come forward on a sufficient scale, then Government may need to provide greater fiscal or other incentives to attract the necessary investment into strategic storage. Consideration should also be given to adjusting the regulatory system to make sure that sufficient commercial and strategic storage and LNG import capacity is made available to serve the needs of the growing UK gas market. Without strategic storage, the UK’s gas supply system will remain vulnerable to problems at a major gas terminal and to supply problems with major gas fields or pipelines – we have already experienced the costs of outages in the Rough storage facility.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.