UK: Michael Douglas Photo Exclusive And Other Stories

Last Updated: 10 May 2007
Article by Tim Strong and Ivan Wilkinson

House of Lords re-defines the law on economic torts and commercial confidentiality: OBG v Allan; Douglas v Hello! Limited; and Mainstream v Young (2007).

In an important triple judgment, issued on 2 May 2007, the House of Lords has provided welcome clarification of the law relating to tort claims for economic loss caused by intentional acts - also taking the opportunity to extend the law on breach of confidence.

The judgment covers three separate cases, each of which had raised related issues. The most well-known of these is Douglas and Others v Hello!, where OK! magazine was seeking damages from Hello! magazine for the unauthorised publication of photographs of Michael Douglas’s wedding to Catherine Zeta-Jones. The other two cases were OBG v Allan, relating to losses suffered by the claimant company following the unauthorised appointment of administrative receivers, and Mainstream v Young, where the defendant was alleged to have facilitated breach of contract by two employees of a property company who had diverted a development opportunity to a joint venture in which they were interested.

The judgment contains somewhat divergent opinions from each of the panel of five Law Lords who heard the case, but a majority agreed with each element of the leading judgment of Lord Hoffmann, and the essential findings are as follows.

The economic torts

Their Lordships recognised that the previous law on the so-called "economic torts" was, to quote Lord Nicholls, in a "terrible mess", and their judgment goes a long way towards clarifying the position. The key points are as follows.

  • The panel unanimously agreed that, contrary to what is suggested in some of the authorities and textbooks, there were in fact only two, distinct torts relevant to the cases in question. The first is the tort of inducing a breach of contract ("Inducement"), which originally dates from the classic case of Lumley v Gye in 1853. The second is the tort of causing loss by unlawful means ("Unlawful Causation of Loss"). Although these two torts can potentially overlap, their Lordships made it clear that there is no separate, intermediate tort of "interfering with contractual relations" - i.e. a hybrid tort which does not require either the intentional procurement of a breach of contract nor the intentional causation of loss by unlawful means.
  • As regards Inducement, there are two key ingredients. The first is that the defendant must know that he is inducing a breach of contract, or (as a minimum, per Lord Nicholls) have deliberately turned a blind eye to the fact that he is doing so. The tort will not however be made out if the defendant can prove, as happened in the Mainstream case, that he honestly believed there would be no breach of contract - even if that belief might appear objectively unreasonable. The second ingredient of the tort is that the defendant must have intended to procure the breach: either as an end in itself or, as is more often the case, as a means to an end (usually the defendant’s own financial advantage). It is, however, not sufficient merely to show that the breach of contract was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s action.
  • As regards Unlawful Causation of Loss, the Court of Appeal in Douglas had sought to limit the scope of the tort by (as above) interpreting the concept of the defendant’s intention restrictively - ruling that OK!’s claim failed because Hello! did not "intend" to cause loss to OK!, even though Hello! had been seeking its own financial advantage. Lord Hoffman characterised this type of approach as "artificially narrow", again stating that one intends to cause loss even if the objective in doing so is to enrich oneself (as had been the case with Hello!’s publication of the unauthorised photographs). He said that the scope of the tort should, however, be controlled by a more restrictive interpretation of "unlawful means" than that used by the Court of Appeal. The tort should only apply where the defendant has interfered with the freedom of a third party in a way which: (i) is unlawful as against that third party; and (ii) affects the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant. The majority of the panel agreed with this approach, although Lord Nicholls favoured a wider, less specific definition of "unlawful means".

The implications of these findings for the Mainstream and Hello! cases have already been referred to above. On the facts of the OBG case, the Law Lords held that the company’s administrative receivers, although improperly appointed, were neither liable for Inducement (because there had been no breach of contract) nor for Unlawful Causation of Loss (because there had been no intention to cause loss and no employment of unlawful means).


It had also been argued as a separate point in the OBG case that the administrative receivers should compensate the company, on a strict liability basis, for "conversion" (i.e. misappropriation) of the company’s debts and other contractual rights. A majority of the panel however ruled that it would be inappropriate to extend the tort of conversion to contractual rights in this way, and that the tort should remain limited to the conversion of tangible assets and documents of title.

Breach of confidence

The panel did, however, (by a three to two majority) rule that Hello! was liable to OK! for breach of the latter’s equitable right to confidentiality regarding all photographs of the Douglases’ wedding.

In doing so, it reversed the Court of Appeal, which had taken the somewhat artificial view that the obligation of confidence from which OK! benefited had only covered the photographs which the Douglases had authorised them to publish. It had therefore ruled that the publication of Hello!’s photographs did not infringe any right of OK! (although it may have invaded a residual right of privacy of the Douglases). Rejecting this approach, Lord Hoffmann warned against the danger here of legal theory "losing touch with reality". OK! had paid £1m for the confidentiality of any photographs of the wedding, and that was, in his view, an actionable right of confidentiality which Hello! had breached.

In one of the two dissenting opinions on this issue, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe questioned the wisdom of this approach in breach of confidence cases. He warned that expanding duties of confidence to protect "wholly commercial" interests (such as OK!’s exclusivity rights) could potentially lead to "an uncontrolled and unprincipled explosion" of the law in this area. He noted that such protection is not available to licensees of established intellectual property rights and that, in the commercial context, the traditional preserve of the law of confidence has been restricted to the protection of trade secrets.

Practical implications

  • The scope of the economic torts is now much clearer. As regards Unlawful Causation of Loss there is still considerable scope for dispute about precisely what constitutes "unlawful means". As Lord Walker pointed out, the test proposed by Lord Hoffman in this area "might be regarded as so flexible as to be of limited utility" and is unlikely to be the last word on this difficult and important area of the law.
  • The definition of intention for both Unlawful Causation of Loss and Inducement has been clarified in a logical manner, removing the anomaly that a defendant could be held not to have "intended" the relevant tort if his primary purpose was (as is usually the case) his own gain rather than the infliction of loss or contractual breach on the claimant. However, the good news for defendants is that in Inducement cases they can still escape liability if they can prove that they honestly believed there would be no breach of contract, even if that belief was objectively unreasonable - an escape route which clearly troubled the Court of Appeal in the Mainstream case.
  • The new ruling on breach of confidence will no doubt encourage further litigation by media companies and others wishing to protect commercial confidentiality. However, it is hard to predict how the ruling will be interpreted by the courts in the context of future commercial disputes. Will it be interpreted as turning on its own specific facts? Or will it be interpreted more widely, stretching the law of confidence further from its traditional role of protecting trade secrets, towards the protection of "exclusives"?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.