UK: Competition In The Television Sector

Last Updated: 19 April 2007
Article by Rosemary Choueka

Originally published in Lawrence Graham's 'SmartLaw' newsletter, March 2007

© Lawrence Graham LLP

The rapid pace of change in communications technology means that soon it may no longer be appropriate to look at television programming in isolation. This is making the regulators’ lives a lot more challenging, as the fall-out from the conjoining of BSkyB and ITV has highlighted. Convergence is no longer just a theory. Anyone who wants to watch programmes traditionally found only on the telly can now turn to their computer instead, or reach for their mobile. On the PC desktop there has been a burst of new offerings, from the near-legendary YouTube to the extensive Internet content uploaded by television networks like the BBC, whose iPlayer, for example, offers ondemand access to a wide range of downloadable television and radio. In the mobile telephone sector 2005 saw a range of channel operators trying out TV on mobile handsets. Deals between some of the biggest names in both industries were the result.

Better than soap

Against this background of technological change, recent corporate developments in the sector have been particularly striking. At the end of November 2006 BSkyB announced that it had acquired a 17.9% stake in ITV Plc for £940 million (equivalent to 135 pence per share). ITV announced simultaneously that it was rejecting a takeover bid by NTL at 120 pence per share, saying that the offer was too low to merit consideration.

Richard Branson, holder of an 11% stake in NTL, promptly complained that the acquisition by BSkyB of a stake in ITV was anti-competitive, arguing that it should be considered by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) under the UK merger control rules. Following Branson’s comments, communications regulator Ofcom announced that it was considering whether or not there had been a change of control over one or more of ITV’s licences and invited ITV and BSkyB to comment on this. NTL’s subsequent submission to the OFT also argued that the OFT should examine the BSkyB acquisition. On 6 December 2006 NTL confirmed that it would not make another bid for ITV as long as BSkyB retained a blocking stake.

He’s got previous

The story of these competing bids for ITV raises a number of interesting issues. By way of background, it should be noted that BSkyB, ITV and NTL have already got ‘form’ with the OFT. In December 2002 the OFT investigated whether BSkyB had breached the Competition Act 1998 by abusing a dominant position. It found that whilst the company was dominant in the wholesale supply of certain premium sports and film channels, there had been no abuse. In February 2003 the OFT recommended that the proposed merger of Carlton Communications Plc and Granada Plc (which came together to create ITV Plc) should be referred to the Competition Commission because it raised concerns principally in relation to the sale of TV advertising. The Competition Commission agreed and permitted the transaction to proceed only on the understanding that the parties agreed to a number of remedies, the most important being that all of the existing advertising customers of both parties should be allowed to renew their pre-merger contracts with the terms unchanged. In December 2006 the OFT cleared NTL’s acquisition of Telewest Global Inc; the two companies had been major competitors in the pay-TV, telecommunications and Internet access sectors.

Pluralism and control

Both Ofcom and the OFT are now looking at the latest ITV deal. Under the Communications Act 2003 Ofcom must review the likely effects of any change in the control of any company that holds a licence to provide Channel Three services. The Act also provides that such a company cannot merge with one that owns 20% or more of the national newspaper market. These provisions form part of a network of rules designed to maintain pluralism in the ownership of the various national media. It is well known that Rupert Murdoch, owner of BSkyB, also has a large share of the national newspaper market through News International. But, since BSkyB has acquired only a 17.9% stake in ITV, it seems unlikely (though not impossible) that the acquisition will be found to have resulted in a change of control of ITV.

The OFT applies a different analysis. Under the Enterprise Act 2002 it may consider any "relevant merger situation" and investigate whether it has, or may be expected to, result in a substantial lessening of competition within any UK market or markets. If so, it must then refer the matter to the Competition Commission for a full investigation. A relevant merger situation exists when two or more entities are brought under common ownership or control and where either: (1) the UK turnover of the target is greater than £70 million; or (2) the parties together have a share of supply in the UK greater than 25%. In the present case ITV’s UK turnover is above the £70 million threshold so the issue at stake is whether or not it has now come under the control of BSkyB.

In this context ‘control’ does not necessarily mean a stake of more than 50%; it instead depends on the full circumstances surrounding the acquisition. In some instances the OFT has found that control (in the sense of material influence) has been acquired with stakes as low as 15% in light of other factors in the overall deal. NTL has argued to the OFT that the 17.9% stake acquired by BSkyB could carry more weight than the figure alone implies because only two-thirds of ITV investors typically vote at annual meetings. This argument appears to have had at least some impact at the OFT; on 12 January this year it announced that it believes that it may have jurisdiction under the merger control rules and issued a formal invitation to comment.

The third relevant piece of legislation gives the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry the power to intervene (under section 42 of the Enterprise Act) in "relevant merger situations" involving media companies where he considers that there are public interest grounds for doing so. The grounds are laid out in the legislation and relate to the need to maintain pluralism and quality and a commitment to obtaining broadcasting standards. Where the Secretary of State issues such a notice, the OFT must report to him on the competition aspects of a transaction and Ofcom must report on the public interest considerations. The Secretary of State must then decide whether to make a reference to the Competition Commission. On 26 February 2007, the Secretary of State used his powers under section 42 for the first time, to intervene in the BSkyB/ITV deal. The OFT and Ofcom must report to him by 27 April 2007, the task for Ofcom being to consider the need for sufficient plurality of media ownership in the context of this deal.

The ITV situation thus provides the opportunity to consider two fascinating aspects of this fastchanging industry: media pluralism and the market(s) in which competition takes place.

The media ownership rules have prompted two major reviews in recent months. In November 2006 an Ofcom report concluded that at present there is no need to review the current rules. Shortly after, in January 2007, the European Commission announced a three-step programme to achieve an understanding of the measures necessary to ensure media pluralism. As part of its announcement the Commission noted that, while merger control rules play an important role in preventing the creation or abuse of a dominant market position and in ensuring access for new entrants, they do not replace national media concentration rules and other measures to ensure media pluralism.

Defining the markets in which the parties operate will be particularly challenging. In its decision on the NTL/Telewest merger the OFT touched on the possibility that the increasing tendency to bundle pay-TV, telecommunications and Internet services into a single ‘triple play’ package (or ‘quadruple play’ if telecommunications is split into fixed and mobile) may create its own frame of reference. It also considered whether the merger could result in co-ordinated behaviour between BSkyB and the merged NTL/Telewest entity in the pay-TV sector to block third-party channels. For the current ITV deal it is likely that the OFT will have to probe these issues in greater depth. The deal could have a number of other anti-competitive effects, particularly in the provision of news, bidding for sporting rights and ownership of Freeview. The competition authorities have already shown a strong desire to keep the sports rights bidding process unencumbered by cross-shareholdings. ITN (in which ITV and BSkyB each has a 20% stake) is BSkyB’s main commercial news rival. Similarly, Freeview was set up as an alternative to BSkyB. But now, through its interest in ITV, BSkyB could perhaps exercise influence beyond its original 20% share, and possibly even create an opportunity to run down Freeview.

Whether the regulators, assisted by NTL, will have the ability to halt the advance of the Murdoch media empire remains to be seen.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions