UK: Pensioned Off

Last Updated: 22 February 2007
Article by Tim Strong and Fergal Cathie

Many of the pensions claims we are now seeing arise out of changes made to the pensions regime more than a decade ago.

It may or may not be coincidental that these claims are arising at a time when employers and pensions trustees are under unprecedented pressure from pension fund shortfalls, as a combination of increased longevity of the workforce, low investment returns and an ever-greater regulatory burden take their toll.Whether or not that is the cause of the trend, these claims represent a serious threat to solicitors and their insurers.

The Barber decision

A particular source of claims against solicitors is pensions equalisation.

Since the decision in Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group (1991), it has been known that the principle of equal pay for men and women applies to occupational pension schemes. The implications of this decision for occupational pension schemes were profound, as many did not provide equal benefits for men and women. The most common difference was in the retirement age of men and women. Typically, schemes would have a retirement age of 65 for men and 60 for women.

Barber was decided over 15 years ago but, as is often the case with such wide-ranging changes in the law, it was the policy of many employers and pensions trustees to await clarification of the law, through subsequent court decisions, before steps were taken fully to implement the new procedures. Uncertainty about the position following Barber centred on how long employers had to implement the new rules into their pension schemes, on the issue of whether equalisation had to be backdated and whether it was the trustees or the employers who were responsible for equalising the benefits.

In practice, even following clarification of Barber in the Ten Oeuver, Coloroll and Smith Adsel decisions, many pension schemes failed to equalise benefits or attempted to equalise benefits between men and women in a different way to that which was intended by the courts or required by the rules of the scheme. Often this will have followed consultation with firms of lawyers, accountants and actuaries.

Recent developments

Over the last year, there have been at least four cases examining whether schemes have properly equalised their benefits under Barber. In addition, there have been press stories of trustees and employers commencing negligence actions against former advisers, claiming that their advisers failed to equalise benefits correctly, or that they were misled over the effects of Barber.

Common features of these claims are that the problems have been identified some considerable time after the benefits were supposed to have been equalised so that memories have faded, relevant documents have been lost or destroyed, and limitation issues may arise. The financial exposure is often alleged to be in the many millions of pounds, because schemes will generally have been incorrectly calculating benefits for some time. The trustees look to the employer to make good the resulting funding deficit, and the employer in turn looks to the advisers. In many cases, more than one adviser will be in the firing line, adding to the complexity of defending the claim.

Typical claims

The claims tend to fall into two broad categories. First, claims that the benefits have not been equalised at all: the amendment allegedly does not satisfy the requirements of Barber or, more commonly, a procedural error in amending the scheme rules has taken place, with the effect that benefits have not been properly equalised. A common scenario was for the trustees or company, on the advice of a pensions consultant, to announce that retirement ages were being equalised with effect from a specified date, but no deed of amendment was then executed to implement the announcement. Examples of this are Trustee Solutions and others v Dubery (2006), Bestrustees v Stuart (2001) and Hodgson and others v Toray Textiles Europe Limited and others (2006).

While this may give rise to claims directly against pensions consultants and lawyers (and sometimes with good cause), we are also seeing a second category of claims arising, which are not directly concerned with the process of equalising benefits in furtherance of the Barber decision. For example, the situation may arise where a professional adviser is asked to assist on a corporate transaction not directly related to pensions and is alleged to have failed, in the course of the due diligence process, either to identify or address an issue with a company’s attempts to equalise benefits, or properly to advise on the implications of benefits remaining unequalised.

In the cases we are seeing, the employers’ claim is generally that, had they been properly advised, they would have taken steps to rectify the position and thereby limit additional costs to the scheme which have now been incurred. This secondary category of indirect claim gives rise to interesting questions relating to the scope of a professional adviser’s retainer. For example, if a client instructs a lawyer to advise on a pensions issue unconnected with equalisation, to what extent should the lawyer advise on the implications of failing to equalise benefits if he becomes aware that there is an issue? What steps should he take to investigate the position?

It has been established by various authorities that the extent of the solicitor’s duty depends upon the precise terms of (and any limitations placed upon) the retainer including the extent to which, according to the client's knowledge and experience, the client appears to need advice. This test was articulated by the Court of Appeal in National Home Loans v Giffen Couch & Archer (a firm) (1998).

Moreover, the authority of Mortgage Express Limited v Bowerman & Partners (1996) provides that a client cannot expect a solicitor to undertake work he had not asked him to do and for which he would not wish to pay. However, if in the course of doing the work he was instructed to do the solicitor comes into possession of information which is not confidential and which is clearly of significance to the client, then the client could reasonably expect the solicitor to pass it on. Applying it to the situation described above, where a lawyer is asked to advise on a pensions issue unconnected with Barber equalisation, if the lawyer has reason to believe in the course of his enquiries that there may be a significant commercial issue with equalisation of benefits, then it appears from Mortgage Express that he may be under a duty to bring his concerns to the client’s attention. Beyond that, the onus is clearly on the client to instruct his lawyer to enquire further. There have been other key decisions on scope of duty, such as Credit Lyonnais SA v Russell Jones &Walker (2003) and a number of recent decisions covered in our article on page six.

While the National Home Loans decision concerned mortgage lending, the Court in that case expressed the hope that the limits placed on solicitors’ duties by the decision would deter clients looking for someone to blame for their losses from automatically pursuing a claim against their solicitors. Given the problems being experienced with pensions shortfalls, many firms will hope that the courts will, faced with future decisions, be prepared to express a similar view. Although it may be too late for many firms to address any risk management issues arising out of Barber and pensions equalisation cases, the lessons are there to be learned.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions