UK: Pensioned Off

Last Updated: 22 February 2007
Article by Tim Strong and Fergal Cathie

Many of the pensions claims we are now seeing arise out of changes made to the pensions regime more than a decade ago.

It may or may not be coincidental that these claims are arising at a time when employers and pensions trustees are under unprecedented pressure from pension fund shortfalls, as a combination of increased longevity of the workforce, low investment returns and an ever-greater regulatory burden take their toll.Whether or not that is the cause of the trend, these claims represent a serious threat to solicitors and their insurers.

The Barber decision

A particular source of claims against solicitors is pensions equalisation.

Since the decision in Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group (1991), it has been known that the principle of equal pay for men and women applies to occupational pension schemes. The implications of this decision for occupational pension schemes were profound, as many did not provide equal benefits for men and women. The most common difference was in the retirement age of men and women. Typically, schemes would have a retirement age of 65 for men and 60 for women.

Barber was decided over 15 years ago but, as is often the case with such wide-ranging changes in the law, it was the policy of many employers and pensions trustees to await clarification of the law, through subsequent court decisions, before steps were taken fully to implement the new procedures. Uncertainty about the position following Barber centred on how long employers had to implement the new rules into their pension schemes, on the issue of whether equalisation had to be backdated and whether it was the trustees or the employers who were responsible for equalising the benefits.

In practice, even following clarification of Barber in the Ten Oeuver, Coloroll and Smith Adsel decisions, many pension schemes failed to equalise benefits or attempted to equalise benefits between men and women in a different way to that which was intended by the courts or required by the rules of the scheme. Often this will have followed consultation with firms of lawyers, accountants and actuaries.

Recent developments

Over the last year, there have been at least four cases examining whether schemes have properly equalised their benefits under Barber. In addition, there have been press stories of trustees and employers commencing negligence actions against former advisers, claiming that their advisers failed to equalise benefits correctly, or that they were misled over the effects of Barber.

Common features of these claims are that the problems have been identified some considerable time after the benefits were supposed to have been equalised so that memories have faded, relevant documents have been lost or destroyed, and limitation issues may arise. The financial exposure is often alleged to be in the many millions of pounds, because schemes will generally have been incorrectly calculating benefits for some time. The trustees look to the employer to make good the resulting funding deficit, and the employer in turn looks to the advisers. In many cases, more than one adviser will be in the firing line, adding to the complexity of defending the claim.

Typical claims

The claims tend to fall into two broad categories. First, claims that the benefits have not been equalised at all: the amendment allegedly does not satisfy the requirements of Barber or, more commonly, a procedural error in amending the scheme rules has taken place, with the effect that benefits have not been properly equalised. A common scenario was for the trustees or company, on the advice of a pensions consultant, to announce that retirement ages were being equalised with effect from a specified date, but no deed of amendment was then executed to implement the announcement. Examples of this are Trustee Solutions and others v Dubery (2006), Bestrustees v Stuart (2001) and Hodgson and others v Toray Textiles Europe Limited and others (2006).

While this may give rise to claims directly against pensions consultants and lawyers (and sometimes with good cause), we are also seeing a second category of claims arising, which are not directly concerned with the process of equalising benefits in furtherance of the Barber decision. For example, the situation may arise where a professional adviser is asked to assist on a corporate transaction not directly related to pensions and is alleged to have failed, in the course of the due diligence process, either to identify or address an issue with a company’s attempts to equalise benefits, or properly to advise on the implications of benefits remaining unequalised.

In the cases we are seeing, the employers’ claim is generally that, had they been properly advised, they would have taken steps to rectify the position and thereby limit additional costs to the scheme which have now been incurred. This secondary category of indirect claim gives rise to interesting questions relating to the scope of a professional adviser’s retainer. For example, if a client instructs a lawyer to advise on a pensions issue unconnected with equalisation, to what extent should the lawyer advise on the implications of failing to equalise benefits if he becomes aware that there is an issue? What steps should he take to investigate the position?

It has been established by various authorities that the extent of the solicitor’s duty depends upon the precise terms of (and any limitations placed upon) the retainer including the extent to which, according to the client's knowledge and experience, the client appears to need advice. This test was articulated by the Court of Appeal in National Home Loans v Giffen Couch & Archer (a firm) (1998).

Moreover, the authority of Mortgage Express Limited v Bowerman & Partners (1996) provides that a client cannot expect a solicitor to undertake work he had not asked him to do and for which he would not wish to pay. However, if in the course of doing the work he was instructed to do the solicitor comes into possession of information which is not confidential and which is clearly of significance to the client, then the client could reasonably expect the solicitor to pass it on. Applying it to the situation described above, where a lawyer is asked to advise on a pensions issue unconnected with Barber equalisation, if the lawyer has reason to believe in the course of his enquiries that there may be a significant commercial issue with equalisation of benefits, then it appears from Mortgage Express that he may be under a duty to bring his concerns to the client’s attention. Beyond that, the onus is clearly on the client to instruct his lawyer to enquire further. There have been other key decisions on scope of duty, such as Credit Lyonnais SA v Russell Jones &Walker (2003) and a number of recent decisions covered in our article on page six.

While the National Home Loans decision concerned mortgage lending, the Court in that case expressed the hope that the limits placed on solicitors’ duties by the decision would deter clients looking for someone to blame for their losses from automatically pursuing a claim against their solicitors. Given the problems being experienced with pensions shortfalls, many firms will hope that the courts will, faced with future decisions, be prepared to express a similar view. Although it may be too late for many firms to address any risk management issues arising out of Barber and pensions equalisation cases, the lessons are there to be learned.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.