UK: Relief From Sanction: No Relief From The Supreme Court

Last Updated: 15 January 2016
Article by Tracey Petter

Since 2013 when the relevant court rules were amended, it has become significantly more difficult to obtain relief from sanction imposed for breach of a court rule, practice direction or court order.  It is rare for what amount to case management decisions to find their way to the Supreme Court.  But, in Thevarajah v. Riordan [2015] UKSC 78, the Supreme Court had the chance to review the principles in this area.  It took the opportunity to approve the current approach by the lower courts and confirmed that it will be especially difficult for a defaulting party to succeed in any attempt to have a "second bite of the cherry" by renewing its relief application.

The facts

Thevarajah and Riordan were in dispute over a share sale agreement.  The buyer, Thevarajah, sought specific performance and obtained a freezing order against the seller, Riordan.  As part of that order, Riordan had to provide disclosure of assets by a specified date.  Riordan failed to comply and the court made an order that, unless Riordan gave the disclosure by 1 July 2013, he would be debarred from defending the claim and his defence would be struck out.

Riordan failed to meet the new deadline.  In August 2013 he applied for relief from sanction under CPR 3.9.  The court dismissed the application and confirmed the debarring order.  Riordan did not appeal against that decision.  Instead, some eight weeks later and two days before the trial start date, he made a second application for relief from sanction.  On this occasion the judge granted the application, effectively revoking the August order debarring Riordan from defending the claim.

Thevarajah appealed.  The Court of Appeal overturned the order granting relief.  It held that Riordan's second application involved the exercise of the court's discretion under CPR 3.1(7) because it, in essence, sought variation or revocation of the earlier order.  This, in turn, required a material change in circumstances since the court had made that order.  Riordan appealed to the Supreme Court.

The relevant court rules

The appeal gave the Supreme Court the opportunity to consider the interplay between an application under CPR 3.9 for relief from sanction and one seeking exercise of the court's discretion under CPR 3.1(7) to vary or revoke an earlier order.

Under rule CPR 3.9 the court, when dealing with an application for relief from any sanction imposed for breach of any rule, practice direction or order, has to consider all the circumstances of the cases so as to enable it to deal with the application justly.  This specifically includes the need:

  1. for litigation to be conducted efficiently and at proportionate cost; and
  2. to enforce compliance with rules, practice directions and orders.

In the infamous case of Mitchell v. News Group Newspapers [2014] 1 WLR 795, the Court of Appeal adopted a strict approach to this test.  It held that, for the court to grant relief, the breach would normally need to be de minimis and the applicant would in other respects be required to have complied fully with all procedural requirements.  Alternatively, there would need to have been a good reason for the breach, probably outside the control of the applicant or their lawyers. The upshot in the Mitchell case was that the former Chief Whip, Andrew Mitchell, whose solicitors had failed to file his costs budget on time in his libel action against NGN, was refused relief from sanction and therefore restricted to recovering his court fees only from his opponent should he win the litigation.

In the later decision in Denton v. T H White [2014] 1 WLR 3926, the Court of Appeal established a three-stage test for deciding applications under CPR 3.9:

  1. is the breach serious or significant?
  2. if so, what was the reason for it?
  3. the court should then consider all the circumstances of the case, including the specific factors referred to in sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) of the rule.

In contrast, CPR 3.1(7) in principle gives the court an unfettered discretion to vary or revoke an earlier court order.  But prior authority established that, in practice, the exercise of the discretion is restricted by the need for finality (and to avoid applicants having two bites at the cherry).  It is also  important to avoid the rules on appeals being evaded by allowing a litigant to impugn the earlier order in this alternative manner.  An applicant therefore needs to persuade the court that there has been a material change in circumstances since the date of the original order or that there was a mistake or misunderstanding as to the facts on the basis of which the court made or formulated the order.

The Supreme Court decision

The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal's decision and dismissed the application.  It agreed that Riordan's application was, in substance and effect, one to vary or revoke the order made in August 2013 refusing relief from sanction and confirming that Riordan was debarred from defending the claim.  That order had correctly reflected the principles set out in the Mitchell and Denton cases.  The Court of Appeal was correct when it refused to consider the second application for relief on its merits.  CPR 3.1(7) applied and since there was no error in the basis on which the court had made the original order, Riordan would need to show a material change in circumstances. 

Riordan argued that his subsequent (alleged) compliance with the disclosure order amounted to such a change in circumstances.  Lord Neuberger, giving the only full judgment with which all the other Judges of the Supreme Court agreed, gave this short shrift.  The essential quality of an order refusing relief from sanction is that it is now too late for the applicant to make good their default.  Without more, later compliance will not suffice.  The court gave an example of the type of change in circumstances an applicant would need to show.  Assume the default was a failure to pay money by the date ordered and the court refused relief from the relevant sanction.  If the applicant later went into liquidation and the liquidator managed to raise the funds, that could be a material change in circumstances.

Practical impact of the decision

The Supreme Court's decision gives important guidance for parties seeking relief from sanction and indeed for their opponents who wish to see the court uphold sanctions imposed for breaches of rules, practice directions and orders. 

First, Lord Neuberger described the principles for deciding such applications set out in the Mitchell and Denton decisions as "authoritative".  There is no suggestion, therefore, that there will be any watering down of the court's approach in this area.

Second, the scope for impugning an order refusing relief from sanction is extremely limited.  As a general point, the appeal courts remain reluctant to interfere with a lower court's exercise of its discretion when making a case management decision.  (A recent illustration is Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v. Abdulla [2015] EWCA Civ 1260.  The Court of Appeal rejected an appeal against an order declining to strike out the claim, despite procedural defaults.  Robust case management decisions should be upheld – unless perverse – even where, as here, the appeal court would have exercised its discretion differently.)

Where an applicant does attempt to have a "second bite at the cherry", as in Thevarajah, the court is likely to treat the application as one seeking to vary or revoke the original order refusing relief from sanction.  CPR 3.1(7) will then apply and the applicant will usually need to show a material change in circumstances since the court made that order.  As the Supreme Court made clear, this is a high hurdle and making good the relevant procedural default will of itself not suffice.

What is perhaps not entirely clear is whether the Supreme Court considered the "material change of circumstances" requirement could apply also to an initial application under CPR 3.9 for relief from sanction.  Lord Neuberger made clear that he agreed with the Court of Appeal that Riordan's application was properly to be dealt with under CPR 3.1(7).  However, he went on to say:

"...even if that were not right, it appears to me that, as a matter of ordinary principle, when a court has made an interlocutory order, it is not normally open to a party subsequently to ask for relief which effectively requires that order to be varied or rescinded, save if there has been a material change in circumstances since the order was made."

This seems to suggest that an application under CPR 3.9 could – arguably at least – be covered by this principle.  This is because its effect, if granted, may be regarded as  varying the original order by overturning the sanction previously imposed.  But, as the Court of Appeal pointed out in Mitchell, "on an application for relief from a sanction ... the starting point should be that the sanction has been properly imposed and complies with the overriding objective".  Lord Neuberger quoted this principle, which appears to emphasise that the nature of an application under CPR 3.9 is to ask the court to exercise its discretion to grant relief from a properly imposed sanction.  It remains to be seen if, in future, parties trying to uphold a sanction seek to rely on Lord Neuberger's comments to argue that the applicant for relief needs to show a material change of circumstances.  Obviously such a change could be part of "all the circumstances of the case" that the court already takes into account under CPR 3.9, though without this currently being an overriding requirement.

The final lesson to note from Thevarajah is that applications under both CPR 3.1(7) and 3.9 must be made promptly.  The Supreme Court did not disagree with the Court of Appeal's view that an unexplained delay of eight weeks in bringing his application was probably fatal to Riordan's prospects of success, even if his other arguments had found favour.

Thevarajah v. Riordan & Ors [2015] UKSC 78 (16 December 2015)

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
21 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Is there such a thing as "energy law"? What do "energy lawyers" do? And why should it be of interest to anyone else?

28 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

On 26 July the FCA published its long-expected consultation paper on the extension of the SMCR to all FCA-authorised firms. The so-called "core regime" introduces the key concepts of regulator-approved senior managers, firm-approved certification staff and conduct rules applicable to virtually all staff.

3 Oct 2017, Conference, Zurich, Switzerland

As the founding Partner of the Europe-Iran Forum, Dentons Europe will once again support this year’s event. This compelling event which explores all Iran-related topics will take place in Zürich on 3rd and 4th October.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.