UK: Climate Change: Liability For The Past And The Future

Last Updated: 18 January 2007
Article by Colin Croly and Joanne Jolly

The Stern Review (the Review) concluded that (i) carbon emissions have already pushed up global temperatures by half a degree Celsius; and (ii) if no action is taken on emissions, there is more than a 75 per cent chance of global temperatures rising between two and three degrees Celsius over the next 50 years and a more than 50 per cent chance of a rise by five degrees.

With the anticipated temperature increase, the Review predicts extreme weather patterns, an increased risk of flood, a decline in crop yields, rising sea levels (which could leave 200 million people permanently displaced) and up to 40 per cent of species could face extinction.

It remains to be seen whether these long term predictions come true. However, recent years have certainly seen a dramatic increase in windstorm and flood-related losses to the (re)insurance industry. Whilst such losses have had an impact on (re)insurance rates, the global economic impact is yet to be experienced. The Review predicts that global economic output would fall between 3 per cent and 10 per cent depending upon the temperature increase.

The Climate Change Bill is being considered in the UK as a solution to the temperature increase and associated implications identified by the Review. The Bill proposes the introduction of a long-term framework for greenhouse gas emissions reductions. There are four key elements:

  1. Clarification of the Government’s longterm goal to reduce emissions by 60 per cent by 2050;
  2. Establishment of the Carbon Commission which will advise on emissions reductions;
  3. Creation of powers which will enable the introduction of emissions-reduction measures;
  4. Improvement of monitoring and reporting arrangements related to climate change.

Although the Government is now taking further steps to address issues of climate change, many query whether it is enough and if it is too late. (Re)insurers are already paying out on a regular basis for extreme weather and flooding which is indicative of climate change. An isolated UK response is also not enough.

Similar criticisms have been made in the US, where environmental groups and States claim the Federal Government is not doing enough to accept or address the problem of climate change, and so have initiated lawsuits to try and force action. An example is the lawsuit pending in the US Supreme Court against the Environmental Protection Agency (Massachusetts v EPA) seeking to force it to take regulatory action under the Clean Air Act to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles.

Government intervention to prevent and attempt to reverse the effects of global warming does not yet go so far as to propose a level of responsibility on polluters for historical contributions to climate change. The Review concludes that "those who produce greenhouse-gas emissions are bringing about climate change, thereby imposing costs on the world and on future generations, but they do not face the full consequences of their actions themselves". Most of the world’s producers of greenhouse gases are not public bodies, they are private companies involved in transport and manufacturing businesses. In fact, it is thought that 80 per cent of all CO2 emissions are from only 122 corporations. It is to these corporations that those directly affected by climate change might ultimately turn for redress and the (re)insurance market may end up footing the bill.

In one recent high profile case, the State of California has commenced legal proceedings against six major automobile manufacturers who are alleged to be responsible for 30 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions in California. The genesis of the State’s case is that it has had to and will need to continue to spend millions of dollars mitigating the effects of climate change and the damage suffered by the natural resources of the State. In particular, it is alleged that the snow pack in the Sierra Nevada region is reducing in size and this, coupled with rises in sea levels, will cause flooding and the reduction and contamination of the State’s fresh water supplies. To combat this, substantial investments will need to be made by the State in flood defences and to secure and supplement fresh water supplies.

A number of legal issues arise. These include:

  1. What is the nature of the legal relationship between the companies and the State in these circumstances?
  2. Was there any Federal or State legislation in place that sought to restrict or control the emission of greenhouse gases in California? If so, had the defendants complied with this?
  3. Can the State prove that 30 per cent of emissions in California came from automobiles sold by the defendants?
  4. What evidence is there that the emissions from the defendants’ automobiles caused the damage now complained of by the State?

As to any argument that the defendants have always complied with Federal/State law on emissions, to the extent that it existed, it must be remembered that legislation controlling emissions in a number of jurisdictions only came into effect during the last decade or so. In addition, issues of contributory negligence may arise in circumstances where carbon emission controlling legislation was in place but was not stringent enough and the claimant, such as the State of California, is the legislative body responsible for such law.

In any climate change litigation causation will be a particularly difficult issue. If you are hit by a car as you cross the road and suffer injury, it is clear that that injury has been caused by the impact of the car. However, if a company has emitted greenhouse gases into the atmosphere it is very difficult to link those particular emissions to, for instance, a particular windstorm and prove that those emissions caused the storm to create greater damage than would have otherwise occurred. Taking the California litigation as an example, under English law, the State would have to prove a direct causal link between the emissions of the defendants’ automobiles and the reduction of the Sierra Nevada ice pack. Query, in the absence of emissions resulting from the defendants’ automobiles, would the State still have incurred the same expenditure due to global warming generally? Stated differently, what role have the defendants played in causing a half degree increase in the world’s temperature?

That said, similar difficulties were encountered when claims were made in relation to tobacco and asbestos but advances in scientific knowledge and the willingness of courts to adapt the rules of causation have led to large payments being made to settle these claims by the companies involved and their insurers.

Governmental reaction to the Review and the progress of climate change litigation will be watched with keen interest by (re)insurers. If the litigation is successful, other States or governments may feel under pressure to pursue equivalent public nuisance actions against other producers of greenhouse gases and may feel that they themselves are legally exposed if they do not take such action. Such actions may not be limited to producers within a particular State, and cross-State actions or even multijurisdiction proceedings may be commenced against those seen to be the largest contributors.

No doubt the Californian defendants if liable will, to the extent they were insured, seek to make a recovery from their insurers. This may lead to problems in identifying which insurer is on risk and which policy is to pay out in circumstances where greenhouse gases have been emitted from cars sold over many years. The effectiveness of pollution exclusions could also be an issue. If insurance is not in place, producers of greenhouse gases may seek it in the future not only to cover any potential liability but also the cost of defending any litigation. It is not only large direct contributors to carbon emissions that are at risk. Every company that is indirectly contributing by not taking steps to be energy efficient could potentially be at risk of litigation.

Directors and officers could also be in the frame where it can be shown that they have not managed their company’s contribution to, or exposure to the effects of, climate change.

The threat of potential legal action in the US has been described as 10 times that experienced with asbestos. Given the impact of asbestos claims on the London market, climate change could have similar catastrophic effects if not properly managed and underwritten.

Clearly there needs to be an international solution to this international problem and the (re)insurance market will need to play its role in managing exposure for the damage already done whilst mitigating the future impact of climate change. As is usual with the (re)insurance market, it is stepping up to the mark by offering new innovative solutions and as ever a watchful eye should be kept on developments.

Defra Issues Consultation on Implementation of the Environmental Liability Directive

On 1 December 2006, Defra issued the first of two consultations on the implementation of the ELD (currently set for 30 April 2007). The deadline for responses is 16 February 2007. The ELD seeks to harmonise environmental liability law across the EU by establishing a framework for the prevention and remediation of damage to protected species and natural habitats, water and land. Liability for some operators is strict, for others fault based. In summary, where land has been damaged, it must be remediated to remove any significant risk of human health being adversely affected. Where protected species, natural habitats or water have been damaged, they must be returned to their baseline condition, including by way of "compensatory" and "complementary" remediation. The consultation sets out a series of implementation options together with some firm implementation proposals for comment. Draft legislation is anticipated to be the focus of a second consultation. Defra’s task of weaving the ELD’s requirements into the existing complex network of law relating to environmental liability has not been easy. Where existing domestic law is stricter than the ELD, Defra appears to propose maintaining the existing law. Where it is less strict, Defra proposes tightening it up to the extent necessary to achieve minimum compliance with the ELD (absent exceptional reasons for tightening it further). Implementation is sufficiently far advanced for businesses to start addressing their additional exposure to environmental liability, including assessing the extent to which new environmental liabilities are or can be insured against. Policies designed specifically to cover environmental risks are one option. Public liability policies may provide some coverage, although the extent of their coverage for environmental liabilities has long been the subject of debate. It seems more than likely that new liabilities arising from the implementation of the ELD, like many existing environmental liabilities, are not covered by typical public liability policies.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.