UK: Failure To Prevent Bribery: The First DPA

Last Updated: 4 December 2015
Article by Emma Radmore and Andrew Cheung

The Bribery Act 2010 has been in force for over four years. For much of that time, businesses have waited for clarification of the s7 offence of failure to prevent bribery. In 2013, new legislation (in force from early 2014) allowed for deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) to be agreed with corporates that committed various offences, including the s7 offence. Finally, near the end of 2015, the first DPA has been agreed.

Bribery Act 2010 – s7 offence

As a reminder of the offence under s7 Bribery Act, a "relevant commercial organisation" commits an offence if a person associated with it bribes another person intending to get or keep business, or an advantage in the conduct of business for the organisation.

What is a Relevant Commercial Organisation?

A Relevant Commercial Organisation is:

  • any body corporate or partnership that is formed under the laws of any part of the UK and carries on a business (wherever that business is); and
  • any body corporate or partnership, wherever formed, that carries on a business, or part of a business, in the UK.

What is an Associated Person?

An Associated Person of a Relevant Commercial Organisation is a person who performs services for or on behalf of the relevant organisation. It does not matter in what capacity it does so – employees are presumed to be Associated Persons, and agents and other intermediaries, subsidiaries or other contracting parties may be Associated Persons depending on the circumstances.

What is bribing?

Bribing is acting in a way that would constitute an offence under either s1 (bribing another person) or s6 (bribing a foreign public official), critically leaving out of account whether the action is within the territorial scope of the Bribery Act.

So this means that an overseas agent, which is not itself within the jurisdiction of the Bribery Act, can cause its principal to breach s7 even though there is no breach of s1 or s6 that can be prosecuted.

Breach of s7 – defences and sanctions

The Bribery Act requires the Secretary of State (in this case the Ministry of Justice) to publish guidance on "adequate procedures". If Relevant Commercial Organisations put adequate procedures in place to prevent their Associated Persons from bribing, then they will have a defence against prosecution for the s7 offence.

Where the offence is committed, it is committed only by the organisation and not additionally by any individual within it, and is punishable with a fine.

The prosecution authorities will decide whether to take action depending on whether the case meets the prosecution guidelines, that is that:

  • there is a realistic prospect of conviction; and
  • if there is a realistic prospect of conviction, it is in the public interest to prosecute.

Where do DPAs come in?

The prosecuting authorities also have a Code of Practice required under the Crime and Courts Act, which they must use when considering whether a DPA is appropriate. If the parties agree on a DPA, it must be sanctioned by the court before it can apply. Binding codes also address the contents of a DPA, and the consequences for breach of it. DPAs can be used to impose fines, remedial actions or a combination of penalties. If an offender complies with an agreed DPA, no prosecution for the offences it covers will be possible. The prosecutor will proffer charges for the criminal offence, but drop them when the DPA expires, provided the conditions of the DPA have been met.

The first English DPA

Although the Bribery Act applies across the UK, Scotland has its own criminal prosecution system, and its Crown Office entered into a DPA in relation to offences that took place prior to the Bribery Act.

Now, on 30 November, SFO obtained court approval for the first DPA relating to the s7 offence.

The facts

In 2012 the Government of Tanzania (GoT) wished to raise public funds to support its five-year development plan and other infrastructure commitments. Standard Bank plc (now known as ICBC Standard Bank Plc) (the Bank) and Stanbic Bank Tanzania Ltd (Stanbic) (sister bank to the Bank) submitted a proposal which included a fee of 1.4 per cent of the gross proceeds.

Nothing further happened until Stanbic entered into an agreement with a Tanzanian company called Enterprise Growth Market Advisors Limited (EGMA). Two of the three directors and shareholders of EGMA were the Commissioner of the Tanzania Revenue Authority (so a member of the GoT) and the former Chief Executive Officer of Tanzanian Capital Markets and Securities Authority. Stanbic agreed a fee with EGMA of 1 per cent of the funds raised, and so raised the placement fee to 2.4 per cent. After EGMA's appointment (which was not evidenced, and indeed not raised with the Bank until after Stanbic had discussed it with the GoT), things progressed.

The mandate was placed and $600 million raised. EGMA opened an account with Stanbic into which its US$6 million was paid. Soon after, it withdrew most of the amount in cash, which led to Stanbic raising concerns with its parent, which in turn raised concerns with the Bank, which in turn appointed lawyers to help it investigate. Within weeks, the Bank had contacted both the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the (then) Serious and Organised Crime Agency (SOCA).

What happened next

SFO soon determined there was a reasonable suspicion, based on admissible evidence, that the Bank had failed to prevent bribery contrary to s7 Bribery Act. It also felt that further investigation would lead to more evidence, and there would then be a realistic prospect of conviction in line with the prosecution guidelines.

What was the basis of SFO's view?

SFO considered that the Bank failed to prevent Stanbic and/or its CEO and Head of Corporate and Investment Banking from committing bribery to get or keep business or a business advantage for the Bank by:

  • promising and/or giving EGMA 1 per cent of the moneys raised when EGMA was not providing any or any reasonable consideration for the payment; and
  • intending thereby to induce a representative(s) of the GoT to perform a relevant function or activity improperly by favouring the Bank and Stanbic's appointment.

The two key individuals at Stanbic (one of whom was sacked in 2013 and the other of whom resigned) would have committed offences under the Bribery Act had they fallen within its jurisdiction.

The judge also noted that Stanbic had marked the relationship with EGMA as "high risk", while the Bank had taken no measures to carry out any customer due diligence on EGMA or the transaction. Despite being joint lead manager with Stanbic, the Bank's teams did not believe they needed to carry out their own checks, nor did they raise any questions about the transaction despite the presence of a significant number of red flags.

Adequate procedures?

Normally, companies in the Bank's position would seek to rely on the defence of having in place adequate procedures to prevent bribery (albeit they had failed). However, here, the judge said SFO considered, on the basis of the material disclosed, it did not have a realistic prospect of raising this defence. The applicable policy was unclear and was not reinforced effectively to the Bank deal team through communication and/or training. In particular, training did not provide sufficient guidance about relevant obligations and procedures where two entities within the Standard Bank Group were involved in a transaction and the other group entity engaged an introducer or a consultant.


The DPA will take effect for three years from the date of its declaration, and, subject to the Bank complying with it, SFO will discontinue criminal proceedings at the end of those three years. SFO is not barred from taking any action against individuals or the Bank for conduct not disclosed to it before the date of the agreement or, of course, if any information the Bank provided was inaccurate, misleading or incomplete.

The requirements the court has decided meet the conditions for allowing a DPA are:

  • payment of compensation of US$6 million plus interest of US$1,046,196.58;
  • disgorgement of profit on the transaction of US$8.4 million;
  • payment of a financial penalty of US$16.8 million (the court applied a multiple of 300 per cent to the total fee for culpability and harm and then reduced it by one third to account for the earliest admission of liability);
  • past and future co-operation with the relevant authorities in all matters relating to the conduct arising out of the circumstances of the draft indictment;
  • at the Bank's own expense, commissioning and submitting to an independent review of its existing internal anti-bribery and corruption controls, policies and procedures regarding compliance with the Bribery Act 2010 and other applicable anti-corruption laws; and
  • payment of the costs incurred by SFO (currently £330,000).

Other factors

In addition to the DPA:

  • the Tanzanian authorities are reported to be investigating Stanbic and have not objected to the arrangements described above; and
  • the US Securities and Exchange Commission has been informed and has concluded its own investigation. It is to accept a civil money penalty for violations of the Securities Act.

The judge also noted the civil penalty imposed by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) against the Bank in 2014. This was for breach of the Money Laundering Regulations and related to failings in, among other things, enhanced due diligence procedures when dealing with Politically Exposed Persons. The judge noted that, while there was a common theme, the FCA action related to anti-money laundering policies, while the DPA relates to anti-corruption procedures. It also noted the significant efforts the Bank had made to improve its policies overall as a result of the skilled persons review FCA had ordered.

The right thing to do

In the face of sometimes contradictory guidance from SFO on the benefits of self-reporting, the judge concluded by saying it was important to appreciate that the Bank would not have been better served by taking a course which did not involve self report, investigation and provisional agreement to a DPA with the substantial compliance requirements and financial implications that follow.

What next?

This announcement will be greeted with great interest. However, the industry still awaits what it really wanted – confirmation on what procedures would be considered adequate for an organisation not to be prosecuted if an Associated Person bribed on its behalf.

SFO has intimated that more DPAs are likely to be on the way, so the message continues to be ... watch this space.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
21 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Is there such a thing as "energy law"? What do "energy lawyers" do? And why should it be of interest to anyone else?

28 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

On 26 July the FCA published its long-expected consultation paper on the extension of the SMCR to all FCA-authorised firms. The so-called "core regime" introduces the key concepts of regulator-approved senior managers, firm-approved certification staff and conduct rules applicable to virtually all staff.

3 Oct 2017, Conference, Zurich, Switzerland

As the founding Partner of the Europe-Iran Forum, Dentons Europe will once again support this year’s event. This compelling event which explores all Iran-related topics will take place in Zürich on 3rd and 4th October.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.