UK: Current Trends In Construction Dispute Resolution

Last Updated: 21 November 2006
Article by Simon Konsta

Arbitration, the darling of the ’90s, subsequently lost favour. Is it now making a comeback with the "100 day" arbitration procedure, or the availability of experienced construction judges as arbitrators? The court back-log used to deter many, but the Civil Procedure Rules have undoubtedly streamlined the litigation process. The Technology and Construction Court has more capacity than ever. Is this winning back combatants, or do the ever higher court fees deter? Will the new runners, adjudication, mediation and Dispute Boards ("DBs") continue to attract?

We consider the different methods of resolving construction disputes, and the implications for those concerned and their insurers.


Traditionally, construction disputes were always litigated, the favoured forum being the Official Referees’ court, renamed the Technology and Construction Court ("TCC") in 1998. Over the last 10 years, however, the number of claims issued has fallen from over 1,700 in 1995 to around 390 in 2004.

This reduction can, in part, be attributed to the Court’s own successes in introducing the Civil Procedure Rules in 1999, which implemented a pre-action protocol process. This requires an early exchange of information, and meetings between the parties, to encourage the resolution of the dispute without recourse to proceedings. Another factor, however, may be the current cost of litigation. To issue proceedings for a claim exceeding £300,000 now costs £1,700. This is 20 times what it was in the early 1980s. Pressure from the Government for the courts to be self-funding will only lead to an increase in litigation costs. The Department for Constitutional Affairs is currently seeking consultation on a proposal to charge litigants on an hourly basis for the court and judges’ time.

Although the current capacity in the TCC allows parties to bring a case on for trial more quickly than ever before, the likely reality is that the courts will be left with the high value, multi-party and complex disputes going forward. These are the cases that remain difficult to settle and for which alternative dispute resolution is more problematic.


The general impression is that the number of arbitrations has fallen by around one third over the last 10 years. Institute of Civil Engineers ("ICE") arbitrations have fallen steadily from 21 in 2000 to only three in 2005. RIBA arbitrations have declined from 53 in 2000 to 32 in 2005.

This move away from arbitration is reflected in the JCT 2005 suite of contracts. The default position under the JCT 1998 wording (applicable unless the parties contract otherwise) was that the parties would be obliged to arbitrate rather than initiate court proceedings. That position has been reversed in the 2005 JCT. Disputes will now be litigated through court proceedings unless the parties expressly state otherwise. Around 80 per cent of construction contracts in the UK are based on the JCT standard form contract and so this shift is likely either to reflect or bring about changes in industry practice.

In 2004, the Society of Construction Arbitrators launched a new "100 day" arbitration procedure, designed to offer a mid-way ground between adjudication and litigation, with the benefits of a binding decision, the protection of the Arbitration Act 1996 and an arbitrator empowered to award costs. It remains to be seen how popular it will become. The most likely cause for a resurgence in arbitration could be the confidential nature of the proceedings. In October 2006, the court rules were amended to allow access to statements of case (i.e. pleadings) by non-parties (although this is currently subject to an application for judicial review of the change). For disputes with commercial sensitivities, this could be a factor.


Adjudication has been, and remains, a popular means of resolving disputes between parties to construction contracts. The Chartered Institute for Arbitrators ("CIArb") has continued to report a fairly steady uptake of their construction adjudication services (DRS-CIArb). The number of adjudications in which ICE has been involved has fluctuated between around 100 in 2000 and 85 in 2005. RIBA reports figures ranging from 250-300 over the last six years, with a slight drop over the last two years.

In our view, adjudication will continue to dominate. The right to use this procedure is implied into construction contracts pursuant to the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. It offers claimants the opportunity of achieving resolution of a dispute within 28 days on an economic basis. It allows for awards (on a range of matters) to be obtained while a project is ongoing. Multiplex, the Australian construction company adjudicated seven separate disputes with the Wembley stadium developer during July and August 2006.

Whilst adjudication was never intended by Parliament as a mechanism for dealing with complex disputes, it is (perhaps wrongly) being used for this purpose. CIB v Birse (2004) confirmed that substantial claims, including those against construction professionals, can be dealt with through the adjudication process, provided the adjudicator is able to reach a fair decision within the time allowed by the parties. From an insurer’s perspective, the possibility of an enforceable decision being obtained against a construction professional within such a short time period reinforces the need for the policy wording to contain adequate notice provisions for Adjudication Notices.

Dispute Boards

This mechanism involves the appointment of an impartial panel (combining lawyers and engineers) at the outset of a project, who then visit the site around three or four times a year to deal with any disputes that may be brewing. Decisions made are temporarily binding (subject to challenge by court or arbitration proceedings).

The use of the World Bank’s concept of DBs to resolve disputes is now accepted by the industry and is commonplace, with FIDIC, ICC and ICE including DBs in its standard forms. The UK construction industry was able easily to take on the DB system following their earlier use and acceptance of the adjudication system and the notion of a temporarily binding decision. DBs can include a number of disputes at any one time, and commencement of court or arbitration proceedings will not stay a DB decision. They are proving successful and will likely continue to find favour on large projects.


The JCT 2005 wording now expressly provides for the possibility of resolution by mediation. Despite this, the number of construction mediations has fallen. This is contrary to the general trend that reflects a rise in the number of mediations as a whole.

The most recent results from the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution ("CEDR"), which handles around one third of the overall number of mediations in the UK, reveal that there were 693 mediations in 2004, of which 42 (i.e. six per cent) were in the construction field. In 2003, CEDR was involved in 631 mediations, of which 57 (i.e. nine per cent) related to construction. The most obvious reason for the decline in construction mediations, against the trend, is the availability of the adjudication process.

Running from 1 June 2006, the specialist judges from the TCC are participating in a 14- month pilot of the TCC’s new Court Settlement Process. This is a voluntary process where the judge acts as mediator to try and facilitate a resolution of the dispute. He can, at the request of the parties, also provide his assessment of the merits of the dispute and potential settlement levels. This is akin to the conciliation process which is referred to in the ICE standard wording. Conciliation is a more evaluative form of mediation where, if the parties cannot agree a settlement, the conciliator will make recommendations for the resolution of the dispute. However, the process is voluntary and the conciliator’s recommendations will not be binding in the absence of agreement by the parties.

The Standard Wordings






Dispute Board

JCT 1998






JCT 2005






























1. Implied into all written construction contracts by s.108 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.

2. Under JCT 1998, Clause 41B provides that the parties should arbitrate rather than litigate. However, if Clause 41B is deleted, JCT 1998 provides that the parties should determine their dispute by legal proceedings.

3. Under JCT 2005, the default position is that the parties should litigate rather than arbitrate. Article 8 (the arbitration clause) can be incorporated if the parties so choose.

4. Clause 66(2) and (3) allows a further option of disputes being referred to the Employer’s Representative for determination.





  • Inexpensive and quick
  • Decision can lead to resolution
  • Expert adjudicator
  • Detailed written reasons given
  • Parties can agree it is private/confidential
  • May not be suitable for low value disputes as the adjudicator’s fees could be disproportionate
  • May not be suitable for complex disputes as the timetable may be oppressively fast
  • Adversarial
  • Not suitable for multi-party disputes
  • Award may not create a legal liability triggering an indemnity; this may result in insurance difficulties in the event of insolvency prior to enforcement.
  • Arbitration

    • Flexible procedure, ad hoc arbitration can be agreed
    • Arbitrator’s decision is final (subject to appeal to court)
    • Detailed written reasons given
    • Expert arbitrators available including TCC judges
    • Private/confidential
  • Restricted possibility of appeal
  • Procedure becoming more formalized
  • Adversarial
  • Potentially costly and time-consuming
  • Litigation

    • Court rules limit the possibility for protracted litigation: active case management procedures
    • Detailed consideration of all aspects of the dispute
    • Detailed judgment
    • Wide range of possible remedies
    • Suitable for multi-party disputes
  • Costly
  • Time-consuming
  • Rigid procedural rules
  • Parties will need to have at least considered alternative dispute resolution before coming to trial
  • Adversarial
  • Public
  • Dispute Boards

    • Function is to ‘nip in the bud’ issues before they become disputes
    • Deals with issues before parties become entrenched
    • Allows complaints to be voiced
    • Expert Board members including engineers and lawyers
  • Conclusion is only temporarily binding
  • Not enforceable
  • Requires Board to be in place at commencement of project
  • Scheduled site meetings only about three times a year
  • Mediation/ Conciliation

    • Inexpensive and quick
    • Helps maintain commercial relationship
    • Private/confidential
    • Expert mediator may be a judge of TCC (proposal under ‘Court Settlement Process’)
    • Can encompass wide settlement options e.g. apologies, promise of future business
  • May not be suitable if parties’ positions are too different
  • Relies on parties’ agreement - so no binding decision if parties cannot agree
  • The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

    Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

    In association with
    Related Video
    Up-coming Events Search
    Font Size:
    Mondaq on Twitter
    Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
    This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
    Email Address
    Company Name
    Confirm Password
    Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
     Law Performance
     Law Practice
     Media & IT
     Real Estate
     Wealth Mgt
    Asia Pacific
    European Union
    Latin America
    Middle East
    United States
    Worldwide Updates
    Check to state you have read and
    agree to our Terms and Conditions

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.