UK: Notes From The Regulator

Last Updated: 2 November 2015
Article by Laura Cooke

In this article, we look at a number of recent publications of interest, and a few consultations to look out for in the coming months:

1. FCA publishes referral criteria for enforcement Investigations

Experience in recent years has led many to comment on the increasingly "grey area" between the regulator's supervisory and enforcement work. This, in turn, can cause issues for FI insurers when seeking to determine whether and when investigation costs cover has been triggered.

However, we now have some clarity as, on 10 July 2015, the FCA published its new referral criteria for enforcement investigations. This step was taken in response to a report from HM Treasury in December 2014 which recommended a number of improvements to the enforcement process, but focussing particularly on the referral and settlement decision-making stages.

When deciding whether to investigate, the first question the FCA will consider is whether an enforcement investigation is likely to further its aims and statutory objectives (being the protection of consumers, to enhance market integrity and to promote competition in the interest of consumers). To assist in answering this primary question, the FCA will then consider the following:

What is the strength of the evidence and is an enforcement investigation likely to be proportionate?

Under this heading, the FCA will consider: the strength and availability of evidence, whether an enforcement investigation is proportionate in terms of the seriousness of the failings in question, and the amount and availability of resource that will be required to investigate; prioritisation of this case against other cases that could be referred to enforcement; any action already taken, or to be taken, by another authority or agency (in the UK or abroad) in relation to the same firm or individuals; and the impact that opening an investigation might have, particularly where the subject is an individual.

What purpose or goal would be served if the FCA were to take enforcement action in this case?

The FCA takes a strategic and risk-based approach to enforcement and the exercise of discretion is central to this. Reasons why enforcement action could be taken may include: the deterrence effect in respect of not only the wrongdoer ("specific deterrence") but also more widely by serving as a reminder to others and publicly reinforcing the regulatory requirements in priority areas ("general deterrence"). Other factors cited include holding those responsible for very serious breaches to account with proportionate penalties and sanctions ("justice") and removing wrongdoers from the industry or imposing other restrictions where appropriate ("protection"). More detailed factors in relation to each of these four elements are expanded upon in the criteria.

A fifth factor under this heading is securing redress for consumers, which can be a feature of FCA enforcement action. However, if it is possible to secure redress by means other than a formal enforcement investigation and, where redress is the priority, the FCA will consider those other options without referring to enforcement.

Indeed, efficiency is clearly a factor; the FCA recognises that the formal enforcement investigations are expensive and resource intensive for both it and the firms and individuals involved. Therefore, if there is a more efficient and effective way for the regulator to achieve its statutory objective (for example by utilising one of its other powers such as closer supervision, a skilled person report, limits or additional requirements on a firm's regulated activities or requiring a firm to redress customers) this will be considered before enforcement.

2. FCA & HM Treasury launch joint review of UK financial advice industry

On 3 August 2015, the FCA and HM Treasury announced a joint review (the Financial Advice Market Review ("FAMR")) which will examine how financial advice could work better for consumers.

Given the significant regulatory changes made to the provision of financial advice in the UK in recent years (notably by way of the Retail Distribution Review – the final form of which has not been without its detractors) and the increased demand for financial advice consequent upon the new pensions freedoms, it will be interesting to see what further recommendations arise from this new review.

The terms of reference state that the FAMR will consider the current regulatory and legal framework governing the provision of financial advice and guidance to consumers in respect of investments, savings, pensions and other retirement income products, mortgages, consumer credit and general insurance. This will include an examination of:

  • The perceived "advice gap", in terms of availability and affordability
  • Regulatory or other barriers firms may face in giving advice and how these can be addressed
  • How to give firms regulatory clarity
  • Opportunities and challenges presented by new and emerging technologies
  • How to encourage a "healthy demand side" for financial advice, including addressing barriers which put consumers off seeking advice

Somewhat cryptically, the terms of reference state that the FAMR will also consider the interplay between the regulatory framework for advice and the roles of the FOS and the FSCS in redress.

The FAMR consultation paper has not yet been issued but the terms of reference anticipated that a report, containing recommendations for reform, will be produced in advance of the 2016 Budget.

3. FCA to publish consultation on complaints longstop limitation period by the end of the year

When considering whether a complaint has been made "in time" for the purposes of the FCA Dispute Resolution (DISP) Rules, both firms and the FOS can dismiss a complaint without consideration of the merits if the complaint is made more than:

  • Six years after the event complained of
  • Three years from the date on which the complainant became aware (or ought reasonably to have become aware) that he had cause for complaint

These rules are not dissimilar from the provisions in the Limitation Act 1980 applying to claims in negligence. However, it has long been a source of discontent among FCA regulated entities and their insurers that the DISP Rules do not replicate the Limitation Act's 15 year overriding limitation period.

In its 2014/2015 Business Plan (published on 31 March 2014), the FCA announced that it would reconsider the case for a 15-year time limit on complaints to the FOS.

Although there was regulatory silence on the issue for the next 18 months, on 6 August 2015 (and in response to a question posed during the FCA Annual General Meeting in July), the FCA stated that it expects to publish a discussion paper by the end of 2015.

While this review has raised hope among financial services firms that a sensible discussion can be had on the issue, the FCA has specifically stated that it will be considering whether the current arrangements are delivering the best outcomes for consumers overall. As such, one wonders whether the genuine financial and insurance implications for firms as a consequence of the current arrangements will be given due weight by the regulator.

4. FOS complaint statistics for 2014/2015

The FOS annual review for the financial year 2014/2015 (published in May 2015) contained, as always, an interesting overview of retail financial services complaint statistics and themes:

  • The total number of new complaints received by the FOS dropped by over 35% on the past year (2015: 329,509 / 2014: 512,167) due to a significant reduction in the number of payment protection insurance (PPI) complaints received
  • Putting aside PPI (which accounted for 63% of new complaints received), the financial products concerned were (in order of volume) current accounts, mortgages, credit cards, consumer credit products and services, motor insurance, unsecured loans
  • Only 4% (2015: 14,723) of all new complaints received concerned pensions and investments, which is a similar level to last year. Nearly two thirds of these complaints concerned sales and advice, with the balance concerning administration. Amazingly, mortgage endowments are still the most complained about investment product before the FOS, followed by whole-of-life policies and savings endowments, personal pension plans, investment portfolio management, SIPPs and SSASs,investment ISAs, stockbroking services and annuities
  • In respect of pension complaints, the FOS observed that a number involved sums significantly in excess of the GBP 150,000 maximum award. While overall pension complaint numbers were slightly down on the prior year (2014/2015: 4,290; 2013/2014: 4,361), the FOS noted that, during 2014/2015 there was a notable increase in complaints about annuities. We wonder whether this will be a trend going forward in light of the pensions freedoms introduced in April 2015 so that purchasing an annuity is no longer mandatory. Further, the FCA announced in December 2014 that it would be undertaking a thematic review of non-advised sales practices by pension annuity providers. Another common theme was complaints concerning SIPPs, threequarters of which involved advice to invest the pension funds in unregulated collective investment schemes (UCIS)
  • Of the complaints concerning investment-linked products (2014/2015: 3,128; 2013/2014: 3,104) a significant proportion also concern UCIS
  • Complaints about stockbroking and portfolio management remain steady (0214/2015: 2,043; 2013/2014 2,079) and the FOS is still continuing to receive complaints concerning investment in film partnerships, a trend it noted in the previous year
  • In the period since the FOS's establishment to 31 March 2015, it has handled nearly 2.8 million cases, 61% of which have involved just three issues: mortgage endowments, bank and credit card charges and PPI
  • Claims management companies are predominantly active in respect of complaints concerning PPI, packed bank accounts and credits cards, but have also been involved in other types of complaints including investments and mortgages
  • The FOS resolved 448,387 complaints during 2014/2015 (2013/2014: 518,778), approximately 10% of which (43,185) were by way of an Ombudsman final decision. Approximately two-thirds of Ombudsman referrals were at the request of the consumer and, in 92% of final decisions, the Ombudsman didn't recommend anything different to the adjudicator. Unsurprisingly pension and investment complaints (which can be relatively complex) were more likely to be require an Ombudsman's decision
  • Complaint uphold rates still vary significantly from firm to firm and product to product
  • In terms of redress, around 20% of complaints resolved did not involve any monetary redress; rather, the FOS required the firm to take corrective action. A further 27% of complaints resolved involved the payment of redress up to GBP 25,000, 1.5% involved redress payments of between GBP 25,000 and GBP 75,000 and 0.5% concerned redress payments between GBP 75,000 and GBP 150,000. The FOS said that approximately 0.5% concerned redress in excess of GBP 150,000, but such awards are only enforceable up to GBP 150,000 albeit a firm may elect to pay more if it wishes. However, a further 50% of complaints resolved involved the FOS giving directions as to the basis or formula on which redress must be paid, and it does not appear that these redress sums are captured in the FOS's statistics

5. Highlights from FCA's Annual Report & Accounts 2014/2015

On 2 July 2015 the FCA published its Annual Report & Accounts for year end 31 March 2015.

Section 166 skilled person reports

The cost of the skilled persons report falls to the firm and, depending on the focus of the report, they have the potential to be very expensive. While data as to their use is now published by the FCA and PRA on a quarterly basis, the FCA's Annual Report confirmed that, during 2014/2015, 53 skilled person reports were commissioned. The total estimated cost to regulated firms for these 53 reviews was GBP 38.3million with the median cost of reviews being GBP 119,208, and the average cost being GBP 722,229. Compare to 2013/2014, 50 reports and total costs GBP 146.8 million. The skilled persons reports commissions during the past year addressed a variety of regulatory concerns, including: past business and quality of advice (29), adequacy of systems and controls, corporate governance and senior management arrangements (10), client money and client asset arrangements (8), financial crime (5) and data and IT infrastructure (1).

Enforcement activity

During 2014/2015, the FCA took action against 28 firms and 27 individuals, imposing 43 fines totalling approximately GBP 1.4 billion (2013/2014: 46 fines totalling GBP 425 million), issued 55 final notices and secured 95 outcomes using its enforcement powers. The fines in large part relate to LIBOR and FOREX related enforcement activity. The number of prohibition orders issued against individuals during 2014/2015 was 26, the same as last year.

Assisting international financial services regulators

Evidencing the increasingly joined-up nature of international financial services regulation, the FCA Annual Report disclosed that, during 2014/2015, it received 1,047 formal requests for assistance from international counterparts in relation to their investigations. The FCA's response to these requests included conducting interviews on behalf of overseas investigators, requiring information to be produced and providing assistance to many overseas enforcement investigations. One specific example of international investigatory cooperation cited in the Annual Report was "Operation Dovercourt", the FCA's investigation into FOREX manipulation which, it said, has involved close cooperation with US, Swiss and Australian authorities, amongst others.

Redress schemes

The FCA states that over GBP 20 billion in redress has now been paid across the three significant consumer redress schemes currently on foot (PPI, Interest Rate Hedging Products and Card Protection Plan Limited). The vast majority of this (GBP 19.1 billion) relates to PPI.

Whistleblowing

The FCA reported a 28% increase in whistleblowing cases during 2014/2015 (1,340) and stated that the vast majority related to conduct issues within regulated firms (including fitness and propriety of individuals, organisation culture, consumer detriment, systems and controls issues and pressures on sales targets). Financial crime was also the subject of a significant number of whistleblowing cases. The FCA states that information from whistleblowers has contributed to firms and individuals being fined, permissions being varied or withdrawn, warning letters being issued and other forms of early regulatory intervention.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions