UK: (Re)Insurance Weekly Update 38 - 2015

Last Updated: 2 November 2015
Article by Nigel Brook

Welcome to the thirty-eighth edition of Clyde & Co's (Re)insurance and litigation caselaw weekly updates for 2015

This week's caselaw:

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov

Supreme Court holds that a loan amounts to an "asset" within the meaning of a standard freezing order

The first instance and Court of Appeal decisions in this case were reported in Weekly Updates 24/12 and 29/13 respectively.

The claimant obtained a freezing order against the defendant preventing him (in the usual way) from disposing of, or dealing with, any of his "assets". The respondent entered into four loan agreements, each giving him the right to borrow up to £10million, which the defendant then used to pay legal costs and living expenses (in excess of the "reasonable" amount for legal expenses and £10,000 per week for living expenses allowed by the freezing order).

At first instance, it was held that an "asset" should be construed in the way it would be understood to a businessman, not a lawyer, and did not include a right to borrow. The Court of Appeal upheld that decision, finding that the terms of the order had not made the right to borrow an asset. The Supreme Court has now allowed the appeal from that decision.

The Supreme Court unanimously held as follows:

  1. When construing a freezing order, the court must look at what it says and not what ought to have been ordered. The Court of Appeal had held that certain legal principles govern the courts' approach to freezing order, one of which is flexibility. However, the Supreme Court held that the flexibility principle has no role in the construction of a freezing order. The Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeal that freezing orders should be construed strictly. It also found that the order should be construed in its context (including its historical context).
  2. The courts, together with textbook commentary, have long supported the view that a freezing order does not prevent a respondent from borrowing money. Even though the right to borrow money is, "in ordinary legal parlance", an asset, that is not how the matter has been approached previously. Although the Supreme Court could overturn those earlier decisions, it did not find it was appropriate to do so: "Clarity is important and so is certainty in the context of penal orders".
  3. However, the order had contained the following wording: "For the purpose of this Order, the respondent's assets include any asset which it has power, directly or indirectly, to dispose of, or deal with as if it was its own. The respondent is to be regarded as having such power if a third party holds or controls the assets in accordance with its direct or indirect instructions". This wording appears as paragraph 6 of the standard form freezing order annexed to PD25A.

It was held that the Court of Appeal had been wrong to take into account that the power to deal with the loan monies was subject to the lender's consent. The respondent could use the loan proceeds as it wished and could direct payment to a third party. Accordingly, the loan proceeds fell within the meaning of "asset" in paragraph 6: "The whole focus...of the paragraph is the respondent's power to deal with the lender's assets as if they were his own".

COMMENT: The Supreme Court decision in effect overturns prior caselaw on the point, even though the rationale for those earlier decisions has been allowed to stand. By concentrating on a different part of the standard freezing order, the Supreme Court's decision will prevent defendants borrowing large sums to pay out to third parties before defaulting on the loans and thus possibly enabling lenders to obtain judgment against the defendant's assets before the claimant's claim can be established (and so in effect making the claimant "judgment proof"). That, of course, is on the proviso that the freezing order actually made contains the wording in paragraph 6. But this decision means that the standard wording would have to be amended to exclude loan proceeds, as opposed to an amendment to include borrowing as an asset (as was previously the case). The decision could be significant for respondents, since borrowing includes not just loans but also, for example, payments by credit card and payments from an overdrawn account (where the overdraft facility has not been exhausted).

Metropolitan Housing v Taylor

The test for dishonesty in a freezing order application

Clyde & Co (Katherine Gregory) for second and third defendants

This case concerned an application to discharge a freezing order. In order to obtain a freezing order, an applicant must show "a good arguable case" on the merits. The parties differed on whether this test was the same as, or higher than, the test for summary judgment/strike out. Warren J approved textbook commentary to the effect that the test is not rigid and well-defined, but instead must be left to the judgment of the court. The judge also cited earlier authority that "a stronger case must be shown than would justify relief of a less stringent kind". Because, once the threshold of an arguable case has been reached, the court must still look at all other relevant factors, the judge was required to examine the evidence in detail.

In this case, the risk of dissipation depended largely on inferences to be drawn from allegedly dishonest conduct. The judge held that: "the test of good arguable case for the purposes of the applicable tests for the grant of a freezing order does not require there to be good arguable case of dishonesty. However, where alleged dishonesty is relied on as part of the case in support of a risk of dissipation, it is important to consider whether a good arguable case of dishonesty is established in relation to the conduct relied on. If a good arguable case of dishonesty is not established, that conduct is not relevant to the argument that there is risk of dissipation".

On the facts of the case, the applicant was unable to show a good arguable case of dishonesty in all but two instances, which involved relatively small amounts of money. Since no clear fraud had been established in relation to those amounts, a real risk of dissipation could not be proven.

Bloomberg v Malling Pre-Cast

Whether a Part 20 defendant had contracted out of a contribution claim with the claimant

Clyde & Co (Patrick Perry, Alexandra Saj, Christine Gordon) for third defendant

The defendant engineers to an action issued Part 20 proceedings against a contractor, seeking a contribution. The contractor had given the claimant tenant a warranty which provided, in relevant part, that "no proceedings shall be commenced against the contractor after the expiry of 12 years from the date of issue of the last written statement by the client that practical completion of the Project has been achieved". The contractor applied to have the Part 20 proceedings against it struck out and one of the issues in this case was whether "no proceedings shall be commenced against the contractor" meant proceedings by the claimant tenant only or could also include the contribution proceedings being brought by the defendant engineers.

The contractor argued that the purpose behind the provision was to ensure that no proceedings could be brought against it after a particular time. That argument was rejected by the judge who said that the clear meaning of the words "no proceedings" used in the warranty between the claimant and the contractor was that no proceedings could be brought by the claimant. No wider interpretation could be adopted. Accordingly, the defendant engineers could not be said to have no reasonable prospect of succeeding in their contribution claim. The judge also noted that, if the contractor's argument had been right, parties could effectively "contract out" of contribution claims even though the third parties were not a party to the agreement.

Section 1(3) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 provides that: "A person shall be liable to make contribution ....notwithstanding that he has ceased to be liable in respect of the damage in question since the time when the damage occurred, unless he ceased to be liable by virtue of the expiry of a period of limitation or prescription which extinguished the right on which the claim against him in respect of the damage was based".

Fraser J approved earlier caselaw to the effect that where liability has ceased (as opposed to never having existed in the first place), contribution is no longer available if the underlying legal right has been extinguished . However, contribution is still available where (as here) the legal right (of the claimant) cannot be enforced (because of a time bar defence) but has not been extinguished either. (There are, however, certain exceptional situations where the expiry of a limitation period does extinguish the legal right too eg a party cannot bring an action in conversion as the owner's right to the goods if the limitation period has expired).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nigel Brook
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions