UK: Human Rights - An Open Door Policy. . .

Last Updated: 17 August 2006
Article by Nicholas Dobson

Helpful hint: if you're planning a spot of battering someone's door down in the early hours of the morning, best make sure it's the right door.

For that's how Merseyside Police and the Government came unstuck in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on 18 July 2006 (see Keegan v The United Kingdom (Application No. 28867/03)).

Following a series of armed robberies the police believed that a suspect lived at the applicants' address. Having obtained a search warrant the police decided to effect forcible entry to those and other premises at 7.00 a.m. on the morning in question. Unfortunately, the suspect was not at the premises. The police apologised, arranged for repairs to the door and then left.

Proceedings brought by the applicants for maliciously procuring a search warrant, unlawful entry and false imprisonment were unsuccessful, both in the County Court and in the Court of Appeal. Although Kennedy LJ found that if proper enquiries had been made and the results properly reported, there would have been no reasonable or probable cause to apply for a search warrant, he held that the requirement of malice was not made out as there was no evidence of any improper motive (incompetence or negligence not being sufficient). In addition, although those responsible for sending the police team on the ground to the address had been mistaken that did not deprive them of legal protection.

Also Ward LJ had indicated in the Court of Appeal that whilst the sanctity of the home was one important public interest, another was the detection of crime and the bringing to justice of those who commit it. He said that:

'. . . These interests are in conflict in a case like this and on the law as it stood when these events occurred, which is before the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998, which may be said to have elevated the right to respect for one's home, a finding of malice on the part of the police is the proper balancing safeguard.'

Counsel advised that the prospects of seeking leave to appeal from the House of Lords were poor and consequently advised against it.

The police have statutory power to enter and search any premises for the purposes of arresting a person for an arrestable offence (section 17 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 - PACE). Under section 15 of PACE the police may also (subject to various conditions) apply to the magistrates' court for a warrant.

The Applicants complained of an alleged violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to respect for private and family life) and Article 13 of the Convention (effective remedy).

Article 8 provides (amongst other things) as follows:

'1. Everyone has the right to respect for. . .his home. . .

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society . . . for the prevention of disorder or crime. . .'

The ECHR noted that whilst the forcible police entry interfered with the Applicants' right to respect for their home under Article 8(1), it was nevertheless in accordance with domestic law and in pursuance of a legitimate aim, namely the prevention of disorder and crime. However, more difficult was whether the interference to achieve the legitimate aim was 'necessary in a democratic society'.

The Court's settled caselaw indicates that the notion of necessity implies that interference with the right corresponds to a 'pressing social need' and in particular that that is proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued. Consequently, the Court must ascertain whether in the circumstances of the case the entry of the Applicants' home struck a fair balance between the relevant interests i.e. on the one hand the Applicants' right to respect for their home and on the other the prevention of disorder and crime.

This is where Merseyside Police came unstuck. For whilst contracting states are given a certain margin of appreciation, the exceptions in Article 8(2) are to be interpreted narrowly and the need for measures in a given case must be convincingly established. In particular, the Court will assess whether the reasons adduced to justify the measures in question were relevant and sufficient and whether there were adequate and effective safeguards against abuse.

The ECHR noted the comments of the County Court judge (amongst other things) that it is difficult to conceive that police enquiries to verify the residents of the address had not been made and that if such enquiries had been properly made (via the local authority or utility companies) they would not have revealed the change in occupation. In the circumstances, whilst there were relevant reasons for the police action these were based on a misconception which could and should have been avoided with proper precautions. Consequently the reasons could not be regarded as sufficient.

Whilst the Police did not act maliciously, this was not decisive under the Convention which, as the Court pointed out, '. . .is geared to protecting against abuse of power, however motivated or caused'. In the circumstances, the police action taken without 'reasonable and available precautions' was not proportionate.

Article 13 of the Convention provides that 'Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity'. In the instant case the ECHR noted that in the UK Courts, damages were available only where malice could be proved. The Courts were consequently unable to examine issues of proportionality or reasonableness and (as various UK courts acknowledged) the balance was set in favour of the police in such cases. The ECHR therefore found a violation of Article 13 since the Applicants had no available means of obtaining redress for the interference with their Article 8 rights.

Whilst this case does provide further useful insight into the approach of the ECHR on the issue of proportionality, the domestic courts may well have decided the case differently had the facts occurred after the coming into force of the Human Rights Act on 2 October 2000. For as Ward LJ had pointed out, the 1998 Act 'may be said to have elevated the right to respect for one's home'. So if you're planning an open-door policy, the approach of the Police in this case is not perhaps one to follow.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions