UK: Is It The End Of The Line For Our Current Broadcasting Regulatory Framework?

Last Updated: 3 July 2015
Article by Ingrid Silver, Alex Haffner and Stephanie Morgan

On 26 March 2015, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) published a consultation paper titled "The balance of payments between television platforms and public service broadcasters – options for deregulation" (the Paper) evaluating the existing regulatory framework governing the relationship between public service broadcasters (PSBs) and distribution platforms.

At present, an array of legislative provisions and regulatory codes impose various obligations on PSBs including the requirement to offer content to platforms free of charge. In return, all of the main TV platforms must ensure PSB content is available to all of their customers. This represents one of the key issues driving the consultation – with pay-tv revenues expected to reach £5.5 billion by 20191, should PSBs have to continue to offer their services whilst receiving no direct financial return in the form of carriage fees?

The Paper questions whether the current legislation should be reviewed in order to keep up with this changing broadcasting landscape and evolving technology in the audiovisual sector. In its consideration of what is best for the audience, the DCMS is yet to be convinced that a deregulated regime would be beneficial. The interrelated nature of the various regulations in this sector makes it difficult to deregulate in some areas whilst retaining regulation in others. This is why the industry has been asked to give evidence of how consumers, content investment and the creative sector may be affected should any reforms take place. We have considered the current regulatory framework, and the potential effects of any changes, below.

Is the existing broadcasting framework outdated?

Currently, the key regulatory provisions that set the parameters for how PSB content should be distributed are (as identified in the Paper):

  • Section 73 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) as substituted by the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 and the Communications Act 2003 – This provision dictates that immediate retransmission of PSB programming (transmitted within the UK) via cable is not an infringing act.
  • Must Offer/Must Carry – sections 64, 272 and 273 of the Communications Act 2003 – PSBs must offer their core channels to all major platforms and these must be carried by all Electronic Communications Networks (ECNs).
  • Technical Platform Services rules (TPS) – Operators of conditional access systems must offer technical platform access services on a cost-recovery basis with such charges being fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND).
  • EPG prominence – section 310 of the Communications Act 2003, establishing the Ofcom EPG Code – All PSB channels must be given appropriately prominent EPG slots.

The primary reason for introducing section 73 CDPA was to ensure that quality content created by PSBs was accessible to all as TV moved from analogue to digital broadcast back in the 1980s. Other drivers for the regulatory framework included:

  • supporting the development of cable infrastructure;
  • providing important programming (including regional news) across the country; and
  • ensuring the broadcast of high-quality programming content.

In return for the benefits of "Must Carry", funding received through licence fees (in relation to the BBC) and a prominent EPG position, PSBs "Must Offer" their programming free of charge and contribute to public service objectives enshrined by the regulators. Accordingly, they must comply with a variety of requirements under the Communications Act 2003 including meeting the 25 per cent independent production quota. So the regulatory framework aims to keep a delicate balance between PSBs and other content providers (such as HBO and Discovery). PSBs receive favourable treatment in some arenas but these benefits come with associated responsibilities. Similarly platform providers are able to broadcast PSB content free of charge but they must give up their most valuable EPG slots at no cost.

However, as TV technology has advanced, so other entities are taking advantage of some of the benefits unintentionally afforded to them under the regulations without taking on any of the responsibilities in return. Entities such as TV Catchup have broadcast PSB content online for free in reliance on the regulations. These entities have come into existence as a result of the broadcasting landscape changing dramatically over the past few decades. With the technical evolution in both methods and means of viewing, audiences are watching content in a much broader variety of ways than was initially envisaged by legislators including via the internet, Smart TVs, on-demand services and over-the-top (OTT) services such as Netflix and Amazon.

Live streaming of broadcasts over the internet has led to particular concerns as demonstrated by the TV Catchup, case which continues to roll through the courts. The case concerns an entity broadcasting PSB content (amongst other content) over the internet and attempting to rely on section 73 CDPA as a defence. The latest instalment in the litigation came in March of this year when the Court of Appeal made a second reference for an opinion to the European Court of Justice relating to the scope of the defence of section 73. The High Court in this case has already held that the section 73 defence does apply to retransmission via the internet demonstrating that recent technological advances have clearly resulted in the application of the current legislation to situations unintended by the legislators (see our note on TV Catchup here).

Recognising that the legal framework is not keeping up with technological change, the UK Government is now considering whether any changes are needed. There are many questions to contend with, including:

  • In light of the variety of ways in which consumers can now access content, is it still vital for PSB content to be found and positioned prominently on all of the major platforms?
  • Considering the popular, creative and innovative content created by PSBs, the investment that goes into making this content and the value it represents to platforms, is it fair that platforms receive this content for free?
  • Given the plethora of content available, does PSB content require the special protections afforded to the PSB broadcasters?
  • If PSBs are to be permitted to charge licence fees for such content, should they still be permitted to receive a windfall through claiming the top EPG slots?
  • Essentially, is the current regulation required to ensure fairness or would greater fairness come from deregulation and an open negotiation in a commercial arena?

Industry views

Many key figures in the television industry have spoken on these points recently; it is clear this is something which is high on the agenda of the key stakeholders.

One key change PSBs would like to see is the repeal of section 73 CDPA, which could mean that cable operators would not be able to broadcast PSB content free of charge. PSBs would then be able to charge licence fees providing them with a valuable revenue stream for further content creation. It has been estimated that the annual value of PSB content to pay-TV platforms is around £200 million2.

PSBs argue that figures like this demonstrate the large contribution PSBs make (a contribution which, they maintain, should not be provided free of charge). David Abraham, CEO of Channel 4, opined in his impassioned 2014 McTaggart Lecture that the current situation is "bizarre", and that it "undervalues the UK creative economy of which we are all part and that simply cannot be right" 3. Indeed, the initial drivers behind the introduction of section 73 no longer seem applicable – cable infrastructure is now well established and PSBs have many other routes for disseminating their content and so are not reliant on cable platforms in any event.

The Paper argues that the development of multi-channel and digital TV on satellite and increasingly on IP platforms means cable operators no longer require this differential arrangement. Furthermore, this provision is being used to justify the non-payment of licence fees when retransmitting PSB content over the internet – something for which section 73 was never intended.

With 60 per cent of audiences watching programmes and films via the internet and on-demand services4, PSBs are keen to address the unintended consequences section 73 is now starting to have in the sphere of free broadcast of PSB content (as demonstrated by the TV Catchup case). Their proposal is to repeal section 73 in its entirety, allowing PSBs to charge a licence fee.

However, the fact that PSBs are unable to charge for their content cannot be viewed in a vacuum. The current regulatory framework provides that major platforms must carry their content. It is difficult to see how repeal of section 73 could occur without any changes to the "Must Carry" provisions as this could lead to a situation where platforms would be forced to broadcast PSB content via valuable access points whilst also having to pay for that content. Negotiations between platforms and PSBs would be highly unbalanced in such a scenario. PSBs potentially being able to charge extremely high fees safe in the knowledge that platforms would have to pay them in order to meet their regulatory obligations to broadcast such content (although this approach could potentially raise competition law issues).

And how about PSBs' favourable EPG treatment? PSBs are able to jump to the head of the queue whilst other channels must pay fees running into the millions to secure their EPG slots. David Wheeldon, Director of Policy and Public Affairs at Sky, recently refuted Channel 4's claim that its EPG position is a public good and instead highlighted the advertising revenues the channel is able to command and stated the EPG position "is a private good appropriated" 5. If PSBs were also able to charge licence fees as a result of a repeal of section 73, this argument would seem even more compelling.

From a review of just some of the issues at play, it is evident that amendment of one provision has great repercussions on others. They must all be viewed as a whole if the right balance is to be struck. So why not deregulate the market as a whole? This would avoid the difficulties around knock-on effects. However, many do not see this as a desirable option either. The current regulation in this area has allowed Britain to become a world leader in television content. Many consider PSB content to be some of the most ground breaking, original and independent content created. It competes against content created by huge, incredibly well-funded content creators from countries around the world. If PSBs were forced to operate in a purely commercial context, they would be subject to the same commercial drivers as all the other broadcasters. If content and quota requirements were removed, obligations on PSBs, such as ensuring that large amounts of content are sourced from independent providers, would be lost. Creativity could suffer as a result and consumers could become the victims.

What does this mean for TV platforms and PSBs?

It is clear from the above that there are vastly divergent views across the industry as to the best approach to regulating broadcasting. PSBs, major platforms, content providers and telcos are all amongst those affected. Whilst nothing has happened yet, change to the existing framework is likely. There are increasingly diverse scenarios in which viewers watch content and audiences are able to access more content than ever before. This poses issues for PSBs as they compete with global content creators with multi-million-pound budgets. It also poses problems for regulators as they try to keep up with technological advances and to create legislation that will be applicable to future innovations. Finally, as the UK's creative industries (including the film and television industries) represent £76.9 billion6 per year to the UK, the Government is keen to ensure that any regulatory changes do not damage the value of these industries to the UK economy.

With so much uncertainty about the full effect of amending the current regulatory framework, the Government has requested views in order to build a more substantive evidence base and to better understand the overall impact of regulation on investment. It has asked TV platforms and PSBs to respond to the consultation if they have views on any of the issues raised or, more importantly, evidence of the potential impact of the proposals, in particular in relation to section 73 CDPA. All responses to the consultation were required by the Government by 16 June 2015 with the Government expected to publish the consultation outcome later this year.

The full consultation document can be found here.


1. PwC report available on subscription and summarised on The Telegraph Website

2. UK television's USP: Just how unique are we?

3. After the Gold Rush - David Abraham's McTaggart Lecture in full

4. Ipsos 2014 PSB Review, November 2014

5. Retransmission: Who benefits?

6. Creative industries worth £8.8 million an hour to UK economy

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
28 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

On 26 July the FCA published its long-expected consultation paper on the extension of the SMCR to all FCA-authorised firms. The so-called "core regime" introduces the key concepts of regulator-approved senior managers, firm-approved certification staff and conduct rules applicable to virtually all staff.

3 Oct 2017, Conference, Zurich, Switzerland

As the founding Partner of the Europe-Iran Forum, Dentons Europe will once again support this year’s event. This compelling event which explores all Iran-related topics will take place in Zürich on 3rd and 4th October.

4 Oct 2017, Workshop, London, UK

We are hosting an interactive workshop where we will run a mock High Court trial of an employee competition case – where the members of the audience are the judges. The session, aimed at in-house counsel and HR professionals, will offer an insight as to how disputes involving employees moving to a competitor play out in practice.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.