UK: Projects And Construction Law Update - May 6, 2015

Please see below Clyde & Co's latest projects and construction law update - a regular review aimed at providing up-to-date information for those in the construction and infrastructure industry.

We look at industry news as well as recent court decisions concerning:

  • a disputed call on a bond
  • a refusal to imply a duty of good faith where there was no exercise of a contractual discretion
  • the effect of an arbitration provision in a standard form in an insolvency set-off situation
  • the 'modern approach' to penalty clauses


HSE publishes final CDM 2015 guidance

The HSE has published the final version of its guidance on the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, which supersedes the draft guidance published in January. The Approved Code of Practice (ACOP) for the previous regulations has now been withdrawn and as yet no new ACOP has been published for CDM 2015.

Parties are therefore advised to refer to the guidance when interpreting CDM 2015. The HSE has stated that following the guidance is not mandatory, but parties who do so will normally be doing enough to comply with the law. A free copy may be downloaded here.

New practice note on the electronic working TCC pilot practice direction

A pilot of a new electronic working system is to start on 11 May 2015 (postponed from 27 April 2015) in the Technology and Construction Courts (TCC) within the Rolls Building in London. A new practice direction, PD 51J, which came into force on 6 April 2015, prescribes the procedure to be followed when using the pilot for "Electronic Working" and was part of the 79th CPR update practice direction amendments. Proceedings may be started, and all subsequent steps taken, using Electronic Working.

The potential benefits of Electronic Working include the ability to file documents at court 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and to receive an automatic acknowledgment of the document's submission, although there is a 10MB limit on documents which may be filed. The TCC is anxious for practitioners to take part in the pilot, which it appears will run until the system is introduced in other Rolls Building courts from September 2015. There is an online survey to provide feedback.

Commission launches consultation on remedies in public procurement

On 24 April 2015, the European Commission launched a consultation to evaluate the effectiveness of Directive 2007/66 on public procurement remedies. Directive 2007/66 substantially amended Directive 89/665 (the public sector Remedies Directive) and Directive 92/13 (the utilities Remedies Directive).

There is an online questionnaire which asks whether the Remedies Directives (as amended by Directive 2007/66) have improved the public procurement process, and which are the most relevant provisions. It also asks for certain information about review procedures (duration and the standard of review).

The Commission also seeks views on whether the modified Remedies Directive is sufficiently clear and precise, and whether the balance of interests protected is appropriate. Other topics covered by the consultation include effectiveness of interim measures, the standstill period, and penalties and damages. As well as seeking information on how the directive operates at national level (for example court costs, admin charges etc) the Commission requests views on whether there are still problems in addressing breaches in EU public procurement law.

The Commission is keen for participants to respond, and the deadline for responding to this consultation is 20 July 2015.


MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd and another v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [2015] EWHC 949 (TCC)

This case involved a temporary injunction granted by Mr Justice Stuart-Smith preventing a call on a retention bond. The defendant, Biffa, entered into an EPC contract with the claimant, MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd (MW), for the design and construction of a waste treatment plant. Under the contract MW were obliged to procure a retention bond. It was a condition precedent to calling on the bond that the employer must first make a call on the Parent Company Guarantee (PCG), also provided by MW. After the contract was terminated, Biffa made a call on the PCG, claiming for the costs of completing the works, and LDs which were owed. After no payment under the PCG was forthcoming, Biffa then called on the retention bond. M&W rejected the call, and applied to the court for Biffa to be restrained from calling the bond on the basis the call on the PCG was not valid. The court considered various authorities, noting that the court will not intervene in a call on a bond except in two cases: (1) where there is obvious fraud known to the bank and (2) where the call is precluded by the underlying terms of the contract. In the absence of fraud the court found there was no justification for implying a term that the call on the PCG should be "valid", and that such an approach would encourage satellite litigation and subvert the normal approach of on-demand bonds: "pay now, argue later." Accordingly there were no grounds upon which the call on the bond could be restrained.

To view the full text of the decision, please click here.

Myers v Kestrel Acquisitions [2015] EWHC 916 (Ch)

Here the High Court refused to imply a term that a party would act in good faith in the context of the right to amend a loan note. A duty of good faith will normally be implied where a party is exercising a contractual discretion. The defendant, Kestrel, had issued vendor loan notes (VLNs) to the claimant, Myers, as part consideration for the sale of its sub-prime lending business. It was a term of the VLNs that Kestrel could make modifications to them. When Kestrel subsequently purported to amend the VLNs, Myers objected on the basis that the amendments would render the VLNs worthless. Consequently they asked the court to imply a term that any modification to the VLNs had to be made in good faith. The court refused on the basis that exercise of the right to amend was a "binary choice" based on a simple decision as to whether or not to exercise the contractual right to amend, and did not involve a discretion arising from a range of options. The case confirms that the English court continues to be reluctant to imply good faith obligations unless a discretion is being exercised.

To view the full text of the decision, please click here.

Philpott and another v Lycee Francais Charles De Gaulle School [2015] EWHC 1065 (Ch)

In this case the High Court considered whether the arbitration clause contained in a JCT contract bound liquidators who were seeking to sue the debtor for an insolvency set-off balance. The case involved an insolvent contractor, WGL, which had carried out works for the defendant school (the Lycee) under a JCT Intermediate form 2005 Revision 1: 2007 (the contract). The disputed final account either meant £615,000 was due to WGL, or £270,000 was due to the Lycee. The parties came before the court for determination of how the dispute should be resolved, as the only remaining debt following the liquidation was the net balance under the contract. The Lycee contended that the liquidators could not bring court proceedings under the Insolvency Rules due to the arbitration clause in the contract. The judge decided that, because there were claims on both sides, these could only be resolved by initiating formal proceedings, and that any legal proceedings would automatically be stayed by operation of section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996, which provides for a mandatory stay of court proceedings if the parties have an agreement to arbitrate. The judge further found that it was open to the parties to adjudicate the dispute, although this would result in a temporary resolution only and therefore would not make much practical or commercial sense.

To view the full text of the decision, please click here.

ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis [2015] EWCA Civ 402

In this case the Court of Appeal considered the law of penalties in connection with a parking fine. A motorist received an £85 fine for overstaying the free parking period in a car park. There was no dispute that he had overstayed, but the imposition of the charge (which was advertised on a number of signs in the car park) was rejected on the basis that it was unenforceable as a penalty. The case was assigned to the regional civil judge because it involved a point of principle that would affect other claims. The judge found that the motorist, in parking in the car park had done so on the terms of the parking signs, and thus entered into a contract which included an agreement to pay the notified charge for overstaying. The judge noted the charge had the quality of a penalty but held that it was commercially justifiable because it was neither "improper in purpose" nor "manifestly excessive" in its amount. The motorist appealed to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal considered (1) whether the charge was unenforceable as a penalty and (2) was it unfair under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (UTCCR). The Court of Appeal went through the recent developments in the law of penalties, culminating in the El Makdessi case. Although the authorities all considered commercial transactions Moore-Bick LJ considered that the underlying principle, as to whether the payment was extravagant and unconscionable, could still be applied as a basis on which to decide whether or not to enforce the contract. The first instance judge had held that the proper "modern approach" required consideration of the clause from a number of different perspectives including proportionality to the actual loss, deterrence and commercial justification, and Moore-Bick LJ concurred. He found that unless the charge was 'grossly unreasonable' it was hard to see a basis for treating it as unenforceable, and due consideration also had to be given to the fact that a mechanism was required to ensure the short stay free parking provision was not abused. Having found it was enforceable at common law, the UCCTR were applied. The court found that the arrangement was not unfair nor did it cause a significant imbalance. The judgment thus confirms that penalties which are deterrent in their nature may still be enforced if they are not "extravagant or unconscionable".

To view the full text of the decision, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.