UK: Professional Practices News: A Briefing On Topical Issues

Last Updated: 3 May 2006

On The Up
Article by Simon Mabey

Smith and Williamson survey shows confidence among the professions rising for the fourth consecutive year

For the fourth consecutive year, business confidence is on the up. In fact, 94% of all the firms we polled were either very or reasonably confident about the business outlook for the coming year compared to 88% last year, 83% in 2003 and 78% in 2002. There also appears to be increasing interest in acquiring teams from other practices. Meanwhile, a third of the firms we spoke to had converted to LLP status.

However, two clouds are looming on the horizon. First, the Age Discrimination Act which applies from 1 October 2006; and secondly, the issue of staff retention. Both are key areas for professional firms of all sizes.

Age discrimination

All but one of the firms we contacted specified a retirement age in their partnership/LLP agreement. Similarly, just over a third of firms reported that promotions to partner level were infl uenced by age and seniority and a half said that these factors influenced salary levels.

Although these statistics may not be surprising, the introduction of the Age Discrimination Act later this year will make it illegal for employers to differentiate on the basis of age. In view of this, professional firms should urgently review their partnership or LLP agreement to conform to the new rules. Perhaps surprisingly, however, less than half of the firms we interviewed were aware of the need to change their agreement.

Consolidation continues

Virtually all those we interviewed (97%) thought the level of merger activity would increase or remain the same in the year ahead; and as if to confirm this, 90% of this year’s respondents said they would consider an acquisition.

We also asked respondents if they had approached or been approached by another firm with a view to a potential merger or acquisition in the last two years – about three quarters said they had!

There appears to be particular interest in acquiring specific practice areas from other firms, and almost half of property firms said they had acquired a team from another business in the last year. 32% of law practices claimed to have done this.

Most firms are open to the idea of merger – but the key to success is getting the right cultural match. It also requires the careful integration of business practices which in turn needs an appreciation of the respective firms’ business rationales.

Our survey reveals growing interest in acquisitions and this is arguably because it is far easier to integrate a profitable practice area into the culture of a firm than merging two large organisations. Acquiring small, established teams, usually feeds positive results to the bottom line more quickly.

Holding Back The Years
Article by Tina Williams

New age discrimination legislation comes into force on 1 October 2006. Tina Williams of solicitors Fox Williams considers the practicalities which partnerships need to address

We asked people about the practice areas they had acquired, and for law firms, private client teams were the most popular, followed by litigation teams. Real estate and tax tied for equal third place. Among property practices, commercial property teams were clearly the most sought after.

Limiting liability

Property practices have acted more swiftly than law firms to limit liability, and we found that almost half of those we spoke to had converted to become a company, while a little under a third had taken the LLP route. In contrast, none of the law firms had incorporated, while a third had become LLPs. Of those law firms which were still traditional partnerships, 92% saw conversion to LLP as ‘likely’.

The Regulations (Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006) which come into force on 1 October 2006, make it unlawful to discriminate against employees or partners on the grounds of age. They will override any agreements between the parties (including a partnership agreement). Both old and young will be entitled to bring a claim for breach of the new legislation. However, claims for both direct and indirect discrimination can be defeated by showing that the discrimination is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Proportionality involves balancing between the discriminatory effects of the measure and the importance of the aim pursued.


Firms should review their recruitment procedures. It will be unlawful for an employer to discriminate against a person in the arrangements made for the purpose of determining who should be offered employment. Advertisements for recruits at either employee or partner level should avoid creating the impression that only candidates above or below a certain age need apply – words and phrases such as ‘aged 28 to 35’, ‘dynamic’, ‘mature’ or ‘gravitas’ should be avoided.

Promotion to partnership

Any potentially discriminatory criteria for internal promotion to partnership – such as a requirement for a certain length of experience – will also need to be justifiable. Criteria such as candidates being required to be of a certain age or having a certain length of service with the firm should be avoided. The promotion process will be as important as the criteria themselves.

Profit sharing and lockstep

Remuneration systems for partners will require review. A system which is wholly or partly lockstep (based only on length of service as a partner) is potentially discriminatory although there is an exemption where the lockstep disadvantages partners whose length of service (defined as doing work at or above a particular level) is five years or less. Where the length of service of the disadvantaged partner exceeds 5 years, it must reasonably appear to the firm that the particular lockstep system fulfils a business need of the firm.

Lockstep undoubtedly discriminates indirectly against younger partners. It may promote legitimate aims – retention of older partners, encouraging loyalty, rewarding long term contribution to goodwill – but is it reasonable in fulfilling a business need of the firm? The greater the difference in remuneration between those at the top and bottom of the lockstep, the more difficult it will be to justify the system as reasonable.

Lockstep may also discriminate against older partners. In some systems, there is

an automatic and staged reduction in profit share in the years immediately preceding retirement. Firms will need to consider whether this is justified regardless of continuing contribution to the business.

Retirement age

The imposition of a retirement age for partners of 65 is not legitimised by the Regulations (although it is for employees). If the partnership agreement is to set any default retirement age, careful consideration will need to be given to both the aim the firm wishes to achieve and whether the importance of that aim justifies compulsory retirement at the particular age set.

Compulsory retirement

Older partners have sometimes been expelled not on grounds of performance but because room has to be made in the equity for younger partners. These older partners may be unable to secure partnerships in other firms, so that the loss they suffer may equate to their profit share for the balance of their anticipated working lives. It is sobering to note that the compensation that can be awarded for age discrimination is unlimited.

Records of partner appraisals will become key to defending a claim that an older partner who has been compulsorily retired was discriminated against on grounds of age.

What should firms do now?

Every firm should begin to review both its partnership agreement and its recruitment, promotion, reward, appraisal and expulsion procedures. Discussions with older partners for retirement before 1 October (with appropriate compensation) might be apposite now, to avoid a potentially longer term succession planning problem.

Messages On OFR
Article by Clare Copeman

Clare Copeman sets the record straight on operating and financial disclosure and what, if anything, applies to professional practices.

There has been a good deal of confusion over the requirement for Operating and Financial Reviews (OFRs) on business performance. Firms can be forgiven for failing to understand exactly which disclosure requirements apply.

Brown’s bombshell

In November, the Chancellor made a surprise announcement that the OFR will in fact not be a mandatory requirement for fully listed companies. This apparent u-turn contradicted legislation (Statutory Instrument 1011 2005) which came into force in March last year, stating that quoted companies were obliged to publish an OFR providing a range of backward and forward looking analysis on factors underlying their business’ position and performance. This requirement was effective for accounts for financial periods beginning on or after 1 April 2005 (so, in most cases, for yearends on or after 31 March 2006).

In addition to the requirements for quoted companies, the legislation required all but the smallest non-quoted companies and LLPs to include in the directors’ or members’ report an ‘analysis using key performance indicators’ to provide the reader with ‘an understanding of the development, performance or position of the business’. The rules are more onerous for companies classified a ‘large’ than for those which are ‘medium’. The Chancellor’s announcement did not change this part of the legislation.

The position for LLPs

However, a further Statutory Instrument (SI 2005 1989), which came into force on 1 October 2005, removed the need for an OFR or enhanced members/directors’ report for LLPs.

So the current position is that whilst they do not need to prepare an OFR, all companies, whether quoted or unquoted (except those classified as ‘small’) will be required to make additional disclosures in their directors’ report. LLPs, on the other hand, will not be required to make equivalent disclosure by law.

Just to make things more complicated, the EU is proposing that accounting firms that audit listed companies should be required to provide additional disclosure concerning their corporate governance and professional standards. This will apply to LLPs as well as companies and the largest firms are already doing so voluntarily.

Market pressures may win the day

Regardless of the rules, however, market pressures may in any case give rise to increased levels of disclosure. The Chancellor’s November announcement caused consternation among many in the business world who support greater disclosure. Many commentators, including the Financial Reporting Council, are in favour of OFR-style reporting and many organisations have already produced OFRs or are a long way down the road towards them.

As a result, in spite of Gordon Brown’s apparent concession – which many saw as a sop to head off criticism over increased red tape – best practice may evolve such that LLPs make additional disclosure. Those LLPs that wish to be progressive should consider the extent to which they wish to make voluntary disclosure off an OFR nature in their forthcoming financial statements.

Spreading The Burden Of UITF 40
Article by Colin Ives

Government concedes need for spreading relief but inequalities remain In response to pressure from various consultative bodies with whom we have been actively involved, the Chancellor has accepted the need to introduce a ‘spreading relief ’ to help firms combat the negative tax effects resulting from the change in accounting practice under UITF 40.

Prior to the concessions announced in the Chancellor’s Pre Budget Report, all affected businesses would have been obliged to pay the advanced tax charge in a single installment. Clearly, this could have been very damaging for some firms bearing in mind that no additional cash would actually have been generated in order to pay the advanced tax.

Measuring the impact

Research carried out by the CCAB (Consultative Committee of Accounting Bodies) has showed that following the introduction of UITF 40, a quarter of businesses face an increase in their tax bill of more than 50 per cent, and about one in six will see their tax bills more than double. If a firm’s ‘normal’ tax bill is in the region of £100,000, then to be suddenly faced with a tax bill of £200,000, could be extremely detrimental from a working capital perspective.

How will spreading work?

Final details are expected in the Finance Bill, however HMRC has indicated that the additional tax resulting from the adoption of UITF 40 will be spread over three years or, for those firms most severely effected, over up to six years.

Each year, one-third of adjusted trading profit will be taxable, subject to an upper limit of one-sixth of that year’s taxable trading profits. This continues for up to five years or until the adjustment has been fully taxed. After five years, any untaxed balance will be fully taxable in the sixth year.

On the whole it is hoped that this new spreading relief will alleviate the problem that would have otherwise caused some firms considerable hardship.

Problems remain

The flipside is that, ironically, the proposed spreading relief does not apply to ‘early adopters’ of UITF 40. (i.e. those firms which have implemented the new accounting policy in accounting periods ending prior to 22 June 2005). This seems somewhat unfair for those firms which have acted in good faith and implemented the change ahead of the 22 June 2005 compulsory deadline. It is worth noting that UITF40 encouraged early adoption! Such firms are understandably aggrieved and it seems wholly unreasonable that the tax system should seek to penalise them.

Another consequence, which seems to have been overlooked by the Government, is the interaction of these new spreading rules with the payments system for selfassessment. In the case of a firm spreading the charge over three years, the tax payments will actually only be spread over an 18-month period, with 50 per cent of the liability being paid as a first installment.

We continue to petition against these inequitable decisions by the Government and we remain closely involved in the talks with the CCAB and Association of Partnership Practitioners who are trying to ensure that all firms, regardless of when they implemented UITF 40, qualify for the spreading relief.

We are working with a number of clients affected by these changes.


Firm A’s adjusted turnover is increased by 20%, from £100,000 to £120,000. The taxable profit uplift will be £6,667 for three years (the lower of one-third of the total uplift (£6,667) or onesixth of total profits (£20,000)). No further spreading relief applies as the adjustment has now been fully taxed.

Firm B is more severely affected by the adjustment required by UITF 40: adjusted turnover increases from £100,000 to £150,000, with taxable profits for years 1 to 6 of £75,000 per annum. The profit uplift for years 1 to 5 will therefore be £12,500 pa (i.e. the lower of one-third of the total uplift (£50,000) or one-sixth of profits (£12,500). In year 6 the balance is £87,500 (upward adjustment of £150,000 less £62,500 already paid)).

Tax Provisions And Pensions After A-Day
Article by Pamela Sayers

The pensions regime for the self employed has changed radically from 6 April 2006 (A-Day). This may have a major impact on the way firms make provisions for tax.

Since A-Day, individuals are able to obtain tax relief on contributions of up to £215,000 into a pension scheme in any one tax year (subject to having sufficient net relevant earnings available). In the year of retirement the limit of £215,000 will not apply and relief will be restricted only where there are insufficient net relevant earnings to cover the premium. A lifetime value rule overrides these limits.

All pension payments will now be paid net of basic rate tax so that a £100,000 contribution would cost the individual partner £78,000 and a further £18,000 tax relief can be obtained via a reduction in the individual’s personal tax payments. It is no longer possible to make pension payments gross.

The pre-A-Day approach

Currently many firms operate a policy whereby a full tax provision is made using a straightforward tax calculation. Where individuals make personal pension contributions and provide evidence of the premium paid, a release is made from tax reserves to help finance the premium. This release may be in advance of when the tax relief would normally be given through a reduction in the tax liability payable.

Impact of the changes

If the normal policy adopted by most firms were to continue, a situation could arise where a large number of partners decide to make the maximum contribution into their pension schemes. This would result in tax relief on each £215,000 at 18% becoming due to the partners from within the firm’s tax reserves. This could have a significant cashflow effect since tax reserves form part of the overall cash resources of the firm for its day to day management.

Equally, existing policy may produce an inequitable position between a partner who makes no pension contribution and a partner who makes the maximum contribution. An individual making no pension contribution will be funding the firm for longer through his tax reserves compared to an individual who makes the maximum pension contribution and who would therefore have smaller tax reserves to assist with the funding of the firm.


Firms are recommended to reconsider their policy in relation to releasing tax reserves where pension contributions are made. An appropriate policy should continue to encourage partners to make maximum pension contributions, but should reflect both the cashflow requirements of the business and equity between partners.

Stamp Duty Land Tax Budget Changes
Article by Trudi Amy

Included amongst the Budget Day Press releases was an announcement on the removal of SDLT charges where there is a transfer of an interest in a partnership, if the partnership property includes land.

This applies only to partnerships whose main activity is the carrying on of a trade (other than a trade of dealing in or developing land) or a profession.

The changes for partnerships whose main activity is the carrying on of a trade or profession are particularly welcome and an area where we have, through the Association of Partnership Practitioners and other bodies, been actively lobbying for a practical solution. The rules which accompanied the introduction of SDLT were devised to counteract avoidance schemes, but caught many other areas where a charge was either illogical or inappropriate.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.