UK: (Re)Insurance Weekly Update - March 31, 2015

Last Updated: 13 April 2015
Article by Nigel Brook

Welcome to the twelfth edition of Clyde & Co's (Re)insurance and litigation caselaw weekly updates for 2015

This week's caselaw:

Lloyd v Humphreys & Glasgow

Whether second asbestos-related claim against employer/insurer was an abuse of process

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2015/525.html

The claimant was exposed to asbestos by various employers between the 1950s and 1970s. He issued a claim for damages for asbestosis against some of these former employers and that claim eventually settled. The defendant to this action did not join that settlement though, since its insurers were awaiting the outcome of the Trigger Litigation case (reported in Weekly Update 12/12). It will be recalled that in that case, the Supreme Court held that mesothelioma sufferers sustain injury when they are exposed to asbestos.

After his claim for asbestosis settled, the claimant developed mesothelioma and eventually brought a claim for damages for mesothelioma against the defendant. One of the issues in this case is whether that second claim was an abuse of process. Although it is more likely to be an abuse of process for a claimant to sue the same defendant twice, there can be abuse where a claimant brings two claims against different defendants.

The defendant (and its insurers) argued that, in light of the volume of claims, the courts should apply especially robust rules to litigation involving industrial injuries which have a long latent period, and claimants should be stopped from bringing successive claims for the same injury against different employers. Although the judge described that argument as "attractive", she did not believe that an employee must sure all employers in one go. She commented that the real difficulty in this case was that asbestosis is a divisible injury (so a defendant is only liable for that part of the injury which can be attributed to the tortious exposure for which he is responsible) whereas mesothelioma is not. The claimant "only had one cause of action against each of his employers. But he had a separate cause of action against each. I do not consider that, on the facts of this case, there is any abuse in settling claims arising from the causes of action against the former employers whose insurers did play ball, and not wasting time pursuing the employer whose insurer would not".

The judge also considered whether the claim was time barred and referred to a well-settled principle of personal injury law that if a person has suffered actionable personal injury as a result of a defendant's breach of duty, he can and must claim damages in the same action for all the damage which he has suffered or will suffer in consequence of that breach of duty. She rejected an argument that that rule did not apply where mesothelioma develops from asbestosis. Accordingly, the claimant should have claimed for all the consequences of the tortious exposure to asbestos at the same time (ie in the first action which he brought). Nevertheless, the judge decided, on the facts, to exercise her discretion under section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 to allow the claim to proceed.

Boreh v Republic of Djibouti

Whether freezing injunction should be set aside because of misconduct of a party's legal representative

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2015/769.html

The applicant applied to set aside a freezing injunction made against him on the basis that the claimant's legal representative deliberately or recklessly misled the court. Flaux J considered the following general principles:

(1) Although the duty of full and frank disclosure only applies on an ex parte application, the cases on the effect of a deliberate failure to make full and frank disclosure were applicable by analogy to this case, which involved a hearing which was inter partes. Accordingly, unless there are exceptional circumstances, an order will be discharged where there has been deliberate non-disclosure or misrepresentation.

(2) The judge opined that although deliberate misconduct would not of itself be a reason not to grant a fresh freezing order (provided it was otherwise appropriate to do so), when that deliberate misconduct is viewed as a failure to "come to equity with clean hands", that would be a basis for refusing to grant a fresh order (because there would have been an "immediate and necessary relation between the misconduct of deliberately misleading the court....and the equity now sought of a fresh Freezing Order"). In any event, though, the judge held that it would not be appropriate here to grant a fresh freezing order.

(3) Was it relevant that the misconduct was that of the solicitor and not the client? Flaux J held not: "as a matter of principle, where a court is being invited to impose some sanction for negligence or misconduct, solicitor and client are to be regarded as indivisible". Prior caselaw remained applicable even though there has been no post-CPR authority directly in point. Furthermore, the freezing order should not be allowed to stand here because the claimants had not been "blameless ingénues".

Unite v Liverpool Victoria

Court of Appeal decides whether claimant was entitled to commission where insurance products were sold to its members

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2015/285.html

The first instance decision in this case was reported in Weekly Update 04/14. The claimant trade union entered into an agreement with the defendant, which sells insurance products. In return for access to the claimant's members for marketing purposes, the defendant agreed to pay a commission to the claimant. However, some members of the claimant purchased the defendant's insurance products directly. As a result, the parties disputed whether the claimant was entitled to its commission for all products sold to the claimant's members or only for those products sold via a dedicated telephone line/website identified in marketing materials sent to the members.

This depended on the interpretation of the agreement between the parties which obliged the defendant to pay commission "in respect of the Services". Teare J accepted that this covered selling which followed advice and marketing to the members but rejected the defendant's argument that only those sales to members via the designated channels fell within the scope of "Services". Certain members might read the marketing literature sent to them directly and then purchase a product in the same way as any member of the general public.

Accordingly, the judge concluded, on the facts of the case, that commission was payable when there was a "causal connection" between the Services (i.e. marketing) and the earning of premium. He rejected an argument that his conclusion was unworkable in practice. An appeal from that decision has now been allowed by the Court of Appeal, which found in favour of the defendant.

The Court of Appeal held that the judge's approach was unworkable. Instead, a commission could only be earned where a product has been sold because of the marketing of the scheme (and this would include the situation where a member chose to not use one of the dedicated channels but then, at the last moment, revealed that he is a member): "Such a conclusion links the entitlement to commission to cases where the aim of the...schemes – to promote the sale of scheme products in return for the efforts spent in marketing them – has been achieved". This avoided the claimant obtaining commission when there is no real connection between the marketing and the ultimate purchase.

Society of Lloyd's v Noel

Court defines test for granting an extended civil restraint order against litigant in person

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2015/734.html

The respondent is a litigant in person who had her application for various orders against the Society of Lloyd's struck out and certified that it was totally without merit. Lloyd's applied for a further extended civil restraint order against her. Lewis J held that, when deciding wither to make such an order, the court was entitled to have regard to all the claims or applications made which were totally without merit and was not limited to considering solely the claims and applications made since the expiry of the latest extended civil restraint order. Since the litigant in person here had made a total of seven such applications, the court did have a power to make the order. Furthermore, this was an appropriate case for exercising the court's discretion to make such an order since there was a very high risk that if the order was not made, the litigant would continue to make totally unmeritorious applications. The extended civil restraint order which was made will last for 2 years.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.