We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
The House of Lord has upheld the appeal by the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) in relation to equal pension and sick pay rights for over 15,000 part-time retained fire-fighters.
Retained fire-fighters work part-time and are currently excluded from the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme. They also have less favourable rights under the sick pay scheme than full-time fire-fighters. The FBU claimed that this was unlawful treatment and they are treated differently simply because they are part-time workers.
The Part-Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 set out the conditions that must be satisfied in order to determine whether a full-time worker (with whom a part-time worker seeks to be compared) is a comparable full-time worker. One of the conditions is that both workers must be employed by the same employer "under the same type of contract" and must be engaged "in the same or broadly similar work", having regard, where relevant, to whether they have a similar level of qualification, skills and experience.
The House of Lords held that in determining whether work is the "same or broadly similar" it is necessary to look at the whole of the work that both the full-time workers and the part-time workers are engaged in, and to concentrate on the similarities rather than on the differences in the work. This means that if a large component of their work is exactly the same, the key question is whether any differences are of such importance as to prevent their work being regarded overall as "the same or broadly similar".
The case is significant, not just for retained fire fighters, but for all part time workers. The decision suggests that part-time workers can be treated differently from full-time workers only if they have a different type of contract, and not if just the terms and conditions of their employment are different, and that weight should be given to the extent to which their work is in fact the same and to the importance of that work to the enterprise as a whole.
This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq
Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.
The original publication date for this article was 15/03/2006.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In the recent decision of Trayhorn v. The Secretary of State for Justice the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that a prison had not indirectly discriminated against a chaplain who was disciplined...
Gowling WLG's employment, labour & equalities experts bring you the latest top five employment law developments that may affect your business - what they are, and what you can do about them.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has updated its code of practice on subject access requests (SARs) to reflect two important Court of Appeal judgments published earlier this year...
In Government Legal Service (GLS) v Brookes, the EAT has considered whether refusing to make adjustments to a multiple choice situational judgment test for a job applicant with Asperger's syndrome...
In J v K and another, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has refused to exercise its discretion to extend the 42 day time limit for lodging an appeal where the Notice of Appeal was filed one hour late.
The EAT has dismissed an appeal by Asda in its on-going equal pay case involving a claim brought by over 7,000 current and former employees (the majority of which are women).
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Pensions Legal Update - Spring 2017 (Video)
