ARTICLE
17 March 2006

House of Lords victory for part time fire fighters

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

The House of Lord has upheld the appeal by the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) in relation to equal pension and sick pay rights for over 15,000 part-time retained fire-fighters.
United Kingdom Employment and HR

The House of Lord has upheld the appeal by the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) in relation to equal pension and sick pay rights for over 15,000 part-time retained fire-fighters.

Retained fire-fighters work part-time and are currently excluded from the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme. They also have less favourable rights under the sick pay scheme than full-time fire-fighters. The FBU claimed that this was unlawful treatment and they are treated differently simply because they are part-time workers.

The Part-Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 set out the conditions that must be satisfied in order to determine whether a full-time worker (with whom a part-time worker seeks to be compared) is a comparable full-time worker. One of the conditions is that both workers must be employed by the same employer "under the same type of contract" and must be engaged "in the same or broadly similar work", having regard, where relevant, to whether they have a similar level of qualification, skills and experience.

The House of Lords held that in determining whether work is the "same or broadly similar" it is necessary to look at the whole of the work that both the full-time workers and the part-time workers are engaged in, and to concentrate on the similarities rather than on the differences in the work. This means that if a large component of their work is exactly the same, the key question is whether any differences are of such importance as to prevent their work being regarded overall as "the same or broadly similar".

The case is significant, not just for retained fire fighters, but for all part time workers. The decision suggests that part-time workers can be treated differently from full-time workers only if they have a different type of contract, and not if just the terms and conditions of their employment are different, and that weight should be given to the extent to which their work is in fact the same and to the importance of that work to the enterprise as a whole.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 15/03/2006.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More