UK: Insurance And Reinsurance Update - 24 February 2015

Last Updated: 26 February 2015
Article by Nigel Brook

Welcome to the seventh edition of Clyde & Co's (Re)insurance and litigation caselaw weekly updates for 2015.

These updates are aimed at keeping you up to speed and informed of the latest developments in caselaw relevant to your practice.

This week's caselaw

  • A further update on the Insurance Act 2015
    A link to a our article on all the main changes being implemented in the Insurance Act 2015, together with details of possible future developments.
  • IHC v Amtrust Europe Ltd
    A case on whether an insurer was estopped from relying on its right to avoid.
  • The Home Department v Raytheon Systems
    A judge decides whether an arbitration award should be remitted or set aside.
  • Hither Green v David Frank de Vere
    A look at the attitude of the courts to applications for alternative service of the claim form.

A further update on the Insurance Act 2015

The Insurance Act 2015: Please click here for our update on all the main changes being implemented in the Act, together with details of possible future developments

http://www.clydeco.com/insight/updates/view/the-insurance-act-2015

IHC v Amtrust Europe Ltd

Whether insurer was estopped from relying on right to avoid

An insured under an After The Event insurance policy brought unsuccessful proceedings against a third party (its insurance broker) and was ordered to pay the third party's costs. The insured became insolvent and so the third party claimed (pursuant to the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930) against the ATE insurers. It was accepted that the insurers had been entitled to avoid the policy because of a serious fraudulent misrepresentation. However, the third party alleged that insurers were estopped from relying on that right.

It has been established by prior caselaw that, in order to establish a waiver by estoppel, there must be a clear and unequivocal message from the insurer to the insured that it will not exercise its relevant rights and the insured must rely on that message in a manner making it inequitable for the insurer to go back on it.

It is clear that the insurer must know about the relevant facts before it can be said to be estopped. However, there has been some caselaw debate as to whether an insurer must also know that those facts give rise to the relevant rights. Although there is textbook commentary to the contrary (eg see Good Faith and Insurance Contracts, Eggers and Foss, paras 17.71-2), in this case the judge (Richard Seymour QC), said that the "insurer need not necessarily know that those facts give rise to the relevant rights". However, he added that "nonetheless, to be effective the relevant message must show an awareness of the relevant rights and an intention not to rely upon them" (ie apparent, rather than actual, awareness). In reality, as the judge recognised, it will be difficult for an insurer to give that message without actually being aware of the those rights (as was also recognised by Tuckey LJ in HIH v AXA [2002]).

It was argued in this case that the insurer had given an unequivocal message by: (1) making an interim payment; and (2) agreeing to increase the policy limit. The judge described that argument as "pure Alice in Wonderland". It was plain that neither "representation" carried with it any "apparent awareness" of the insurer's right to avoid. Furthermore, the insurer had been unaware of the insured's fraudulent misrepresentation at the time. It could not be implied, either, that the insurer had not cared about the insured's truthfulness when completing the proposal form. Accordingly, the insurer had been unaware of the relevant facts and so could not be said to be estopped from relying on its right to avoid.

The Home Department v Raytheon Systems

Whether an arbitration award should be remitted or set aside

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2015/311.html

A section 68 Arbitration Act 1996 challenge to an award on the ground of serious irregularity had succeeded in this case. Section 68(3) provides that in such cases, the court may remit the award or, if it is inappropriate to do so, set the award aside (or declare it to be of no effect – in practice, this remedy is of little or no difference to setting aside though). Accordingly, remission is the "default" option and is the one most often adopted by the courts. However, in this case, Akenhead J ordered that the award should be set aside instead. His reasoning was as follows:

  1. When deciding what to do, the court should consider all the circumstances and background facts relating to the dispute, the award, the arbitrators and the overall desirability, and ramifications of either remission or setting aside. There is no "weighting" for or against any of the particular grounds for challenge set out in section 68 and, in particular, "there is no authority which suggests that it will invariably be inappropriate to set aside the award where the serious irregularity ground is the section 68(2)(d) one" (ie failure by the tribunal to deal with all the issues that were put to it) - which was the relevant ground in this case
  2. Textbook commentary has suggested that setting aside may be appropriate where, for example, the arbitrators cannot reasonably be expected to approach the matter afresh or one or both of the parties has justifiably lost confidence in the arbitrators. Akenhead J added that, whilst there is no prior authority on the point: "I do consider that the more serious the irregularity the more likely it is that setting aside may be the appropriate remedy. There are shades of serious irregularity"
  3. The relevant factors for setting aside in this case were as follows:

    1. The case was "towards the more serious end of the spectrum of seriousness in terms of irregularity"
    2. If the tribunal, "albeit conscientiously and competently" was to reach the same conclusion as before, that might lead to a strong objective belief that justice had either not been done or had not been seen to have been done
    3. The extra cost of re-opening an arbitration before a new tribunal would not be significantly greater than remission to the current tribunal; and
    4. The current tribunal would be unlikely to have any significant recall of the evidence by the time any reconsideration takes place (the judge noted that: "Given the logistics involved with busy international arbitrators, there is, at least, a very real risk that it could not re-convene substantive hearings or otherwise move to a stage at which they could produce an award ... for as much as a further 12 months if not more. If that is right, it will be closer to 3 years since the evidence was given")

Hither Green v David Frank de Vere

Attitude of the courts to applications for alternative service of the claim form

The solicitors in this case served a claim form by email but that was not valid service because the defendant had not indicated in writing that he would be willing to accept service in this way. A judge made an order pursuant to CPR r6.15(1) permitting service by an alternative method but that order was not complied with. When the claimant applied for default judgment, the defendant argued that the claimant had not served him correctly yet. That argument was rejected by the court and default judgment was entered. The defendant then appealed against that order.

In considering this matter, Langstaff J reviewed the attitude of the courts to applications under CPR r6.15. He noted that prior caselaw demonstrates that there will be very few, if any, acceptable excuses for failure to observe the rules for service of claim form. In Brown v Innovatorone (see Weekly Update 23/09) Smith J was not persuaded that the power conferred by CPR r6.15 should be exercised only in exceptional circumstances, but he did accept that the court should adopt a rigorous approach. In particular, the absence of prejudice to a defendant was relevant but not sufficient itself for an order. However, the judge also noted a "second strand of authority" which has a "different emphasis". This authority supports the view that there is no useful purpose in forcing a claimant to start fresh proceedings where the relevant limitation period has not yet expired.

In this case, though, the judge had been wrong to take account of a failure to file a certificate of service in time and so the appeal was allowed. Exercising his discretion anew here, Langstaff J held that he should make an order pursuant to CPR r6.15(2) (which allows a court to order that steps already taken to bring the claim form to the attention of the defendant by an alternative method should be good service).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.