UK: Good Faith: English Law v The UAE Civil Code

Last Updated: 26 January 2015

Article by Claire King1


The reluctance of English common law to imply a term of good faith into agreements negotiated between two commercial parties at arm's length is well known and is based on the long-established doctrine of freedom of contract. In stark contrast in civil law countries such as the United Arab Emirates, performing obligations in a manner consistent with good faith is a fundamental part of the contract.

A series of English cases on good faith in early 2013 had raised the prospect that the English courts may be on their way to recognising an overarching duty of good faith but this prospect now seems to have receded. This article provides an update on the latest position under English law whilst highlighting the contrasting position under the UAE Civil Code. Those working with construction standard forms internationally need to keep these very real differences in mind as they can have a significant impact on how some provisions operate in practice.

English case law on good faith: the latest position

The early 2013 case of Yam Seng Pte Ltd v International Trade Corporation Limited ("ITC")2 involved a long-term distribution agreement for fragrances produced by ITC bearing the name "Manchester United". The court adopted a fairly broad and purposive approach regarding the circumstances in which good faith obligations might be implied, raising expectations that the courts were open to an overarching duty of good faith being implied more widely.

In that case Yam Seng (the distributor) argued there was an implied term that the parties would deal with each other in good faith and, specifically, that ITC had: (i) failed to act with an implied obligation of good faith and prejudiced Yam Seng's sales by offering the same products for domestic sale below the duty free prices that Yam Seng was permitted to offer; (ii) instructed or encouraged Yam Seng to incur marketing expenses for products that ITC was unable or unwilling to supply; and (iii) offered false information upon which Yam Seng relied to its detriment. There were no express terms of the contract covering any of these points.

Leggatt J noted: "The content of the duty of good faith is established by a process of construction which in English law is based upon an objective principle. The Court is concerned not with the subjective intentions of the parties ..."

On the facts, only two obligations were implied. First, the court found there was an obligation not to undercut duty free prices, and secondly, there was an obligation not to knowingly provide false information; a duty of good faith was implied in both these respects. The first obligation was contrary to usual standards of commercial dealing and the second was implied into the agreement between the parties as a matter of fact.

The fact that the contract was a long-term distributorship agreement which, the court noted, required the parties to communicate effectively and cooperate with each other in its performance, appears to have influenced the result. The state of the contract, which had not been drafted by lawyers also appears to have swayed the Court.

In stark contrast, the Court of Appeal took a much narrower and restrictive approach in Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd v Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust.3 This also involved a long-term contract for catering services.

The issue was whether the Trust was entitled to terminate the contract on the basis that Compass had exceeded the number of Service Failure Points allowed in any given six-month rolling period.

This contract contained an express duty to cooperate in good faith "as is necessary for the efficient transmission of information and instructions and to enable the Trust or, as the case may be, any Beneficiary to derive the full benefit of the Contract". 4

The question before the court was whether this clause provided an overarching obligation on the parties to operate with each other in good faith. The Court of Appeal held that whilst there was an obligation to act in good faith it was specifically focused on the obligation to take all reasonable action as was necessary for the efficient communication of information and instructions. There was nothing that required the parties to act in good faith in relation to anything else.

Overturning the first instance decision,5 the court held that commercial common sense did not favour the addition of an overarching duty to cooperate in good faith in circumstances where good faith had been provided for in the contract in such a precise manner already.

Applying this reasoning to the facts of the case, the Court of Appeal considered that the Trust was not prevented from awarding service failure points for failures in performance. The contract expressly contained precise rules for these matters and the ability of the Trust to impose service failure points for poor performance was an absolute contractual right: "if the parties want to impose such a duty they must do so expressly".

The issue of good faith was further considered in TSG Building Services plc v South Anglia Housing Ltd ("SAH")6 in May 2013 in relation to an ACA Standard Form of Contract for Term Partnering.7

Clause 1.1 of the contract provided:

"The Partnering Team members shall work together and individually in the spirit of trust, fairness and mutual cooperation for the benefit of the Term Programme . . . and in all matters governed by the Partnering Contract they shall act reasonably and without delay."

The contract contained an "unqualified and unconditional right to terminate" at any time (i.e. termination for convenience).

SAH terminated the contract and TSG argued that the termination was wrongful and in breach of clause 1.1. The issue the court had to decide was whether the good faith clause was pervasive such that it applied to the whole contract and therefore to the termination provisions.

The court accepted that, in principle, an express obligation to act in good faith could be pervasive and, depending on the nature and drafting of the clause, it may be possible for it to affect all aspects of the contract.

However, the court held that this was not the case here. The contract contained an unqualified right to terminate for convenience, to which the obligation to act in good faith could not possibly extend. The entitlement to terminate the contract was absolute. Each party was entitled to terminate at any time. Further, clause 1.1 primarily related to the assumption, deployment and performance of roles, expertise and responsibilities set out in the Partnering Documents.

In the later 2014 case of Bluewater Energy Services BV v (1) Mercon Steel Structures BV and others,8 Ramsey J examined again the impact of a good faith provision in the context of termination.

That contract provided for a notice of default to be issued to the subcontractor requiring them to "immediately commence and thereafter continuously proceed with action satisfactory to Bluewater to remedy such default". If they did not do so, a notice of termination could then be issued.

The subcontract also provided that the parties "shall uphold the highest standards of business ethics in the performance of the contract. Honesty, fairness and integrity shall be paramount principles in the dealings between the parties."

Ramsey J referred to the Court of Appeal decision in Socimer International Bank Ltd (in liquidation) v Standard Bank London Ltd,9which related to the standard to be applied in circumstances where the valuation of assets was left entirely in one party's hands. In that case it was held that a decision-maker's discretion will be limited, as a matter of necessary implication, by concepts of honest good faith and genuineness and the need for the absence of arbitrariness, capriciousness, perverseness and irrationality. However, the decision remained with the decision-maker and was therefore subjective.

Ramsey J decided that the same standard applied in these circumstances and was not impacted by the express clause in the contract although that clause was consistent with it. He went on to find that termination had been justified on four of the five main grounds alleged in the contractor's notice of default.10


It seems then that the English courts are not ready to imply a general doctrine of good faith. The judgment of the High Court in Yam Seng appears to have been sidelined (if not directly overruled) by the Court of Appeal and subsequent cases.

If the parties want to have an express duty of good faith they need to create one and they should think very carefully about its scope. The English courts will not allow good faith-type wording to overrule an absolute contractual right such as the right to terminate for convenience. The parties will need to expressly provide that a good faith obligation operates in relation to such a provision.

The situation might, however, be different if there was evidence to suggest a breach of an express good faith obligation in circumstanceswhere there was a discretionary right (for example awarding a discretionary bonus to an employee). In those circumstances a decisionmaker's discretion will be limited, as a matter of necessary implication, by concepts of honest good faith and genuineness and the need for the absence of arbitrariness, capriciousness, perverseness and irrationality.

Good faith in UAE contracts

In stark contrast, a duty to act in good faith is implied into all contracts that are subject to UAE law. This is underscored by principles of fairness developed under Sharia law.

Article 246 of the UAE Civil Code provides that:

"a contract must be performed in accordance with its contents, and in a manner consistent with the requirements of good faith".

This in effect is a requirement not to use the terms of a contract to abuse the rights of the other contracting party, not to cause unjustified damage to the other party and to act reasonably and moderately.

Decisions of the Dubai Court of Cassation have ruled that an act of bad faith by one contracting party may provide a cause of action for the other and the duty of good faith is therefore overarching, unlike at English law. In deciding whether an act constitutes bad faith the court may also look at Article 106 of the UAE Civil Code which provides that a party is prohibited from exercising its rights if:

  • it is intended to infringe the rights of another party;
  • the outcome is contrary to the rules of Islamic Sharia, the law, public order, or morals;
  • the desired gain is disproportionate to the harm that will be suffered by the other party; or
  • it exceeds the bounds of custom or practice.
  • There are some potentially wide-ranging ramifications of this including:
  • Good faith is most likely to be applied to evidence for, or to support, an allegation of breach. Where, for example, building materials are found to be defective a breach will be easier to establish if there has been some attempt to conceal this or cover up the materials once incorporated into the works.
  • Reliance on a time bar notice (e.g. FIDIC's clause 20.1) is likely to be restricted where a party seeking to rely on it knew about that breach previously (for example, if notification of the claim was made informally and is recorded in meeting minutes or similar but was never formally made). In other words, denying a claim due to the time bar when it had already been communicated, albeit informally, would be an act of bad faith.
  • Avoiding liability for a very substantial claim due to a time bar may also be unlawful where the losses were serious and unequal with the employer's contractual claim to be notified in a required time period (for example 28 days under clause 20.1 of FIDIC). Article 106 (1) of the UAE Civil Code provides that "a person shall be held liable for an unlawful exercise of his rights" and this, together with the good faith obligation, may be used to challenge the effectiveness of a time bar in such circumstances.
  • Whilst the UAE Civil Code does provide that parties may fix a pre-agreed compensation mechanism or amount in their contract, the court may also vary the pre-agreed amount of compensation or damages to equal the actual loss in any event, regardless of whether there was any "act of prevention" on the part of the employer.11
  • Good faith is also applicable in relation to termination for convenience clauses although it is worth noting that the duty of good faith is not applicable to the obligation itself but to the performance of the obligation. Accordingly the parties' agreement that the employer may terminate the contract for convenience is a valid agreement and the UAE courts will normally uphold this. Although this employer's right might be looked at as contradicting the good faith principle, it would be an enforceable contract term as it was freely entered into. However, if the employer relies on this contract provision to terminate the contract in circumstances that give rise to performing the contract in a manner that is inconsistent with good faith, then the court might have a different view. For example, if the contract provides for termination for convenience and limits the liability of the employer to compensate the contractor for the work done until the date of termination, but excluding mobilisation cost, the employer who terminates the contract for convenience immediately after mobilisation and before the contractor has done any work is performing the contract in bad faith. In this case, the contractor might rely on Articles 246 (good faith), 106 (abuse of right) and 390(2) (claiming actual loss) of the UAE Civil Code to recoup its losses.


The stark contrast between the position regarding good faith under English law and that under the UAE Civil Code remains in place. This may make a real difference with regard to how some standard provisions in construction contracts are interpreted. As outlined above, the same time bar and termination for convenience provisions may result in very different outcomes on similar facts, depending on how the governing law approaches the issue of good faith.


1. With thanks to Lisa Kingston of Fenwick Elliott for her great assistance in preparing this paper and Ahmed Ibrahim of Ahmed Ibrahim Advocates and Legal Consultants for his assistance in relation to the position under UAE Law.

2. [2013] EWHC 111 (QB) (February 2013)

3. [2013] EWCA Civ 200 (March 2013).

4. Clause 3.5 of the contract.

5. At first instance the High Court ruled that the Trust had abused its contractual powers in relation to the service credits and breached the express provision of Clause 3.5. It further held that the Trust had acted capriciously and irrationally in the way in which it deducted out the credits (e.g. deducting £84,540 for one day out of date chocolate mousse).

6. [2013] EWHC 1151 (TCC).

7. TPC 2005 as amended in 2008.

8. (2) Mercon Holding BV; (3) Mercon Groep BV [2014] EWHC 2132 (TCC).

9. [2008] EWCA Civ 116

10. In the Compass case, Jackson LJ had rejected such an implied term on the grounds that the term in question was an absolute contractual right and not one which could be exercised with discretion

International Quarterly is produced quartely by Fenwick Elliott LLP, the leading specialist construction law firm in the UK, working with clients in the building, engineering and energy sectors throughout the world.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.