UK: Changes to the practices of softing and bundling

Last Updated: 23 November 2005
Article by Simon Morris

The new Conduct of Business Sourcebook (Use of Dealing Commission) Instrument 2005 will soon come into force on 1 January 2006. The new provisions will restrict the investment managers’ use of dealing commission to the purchase of goods or services related to the execution of trades or the provision of research and requiring adequate prior and periodic disclosure of such arrangements. These measures will have a significant impact on the institutional funds industry.

The key points to be noted are that:

  • softing and bundling arrangements between investment mangers and brokers will be limited to the purchase of goods or services related to the execution of trades or the provision of research only
  • investment managers must make prior and periodic disclosures of the arrangements they enter into for the receipt of goods or services that relate to the execution of trades or the provision of research
  • disclosure of the above arrangements must include details of the goods or services received
  • the term "soft commission" will become redundant.

Similarly, the FSA is currently consulting on the bundled brokerage and soft commission arrangements for retail investment funds. It is proposed that an individual or a body should be appointed to act as an investor representative for behalf of retail investors. The role of that person is to consider the new disclosures to be made by investment managers and interact with them where necessary.

To view the article in full, please see below:


Full Article

Speaking at the conference of National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) a year ago, John Tiner stated "there does seem to be a consensus that softing and bundling lack transparency with regard to cost, and that fund managers have not been properly accountable to their clients in the past. But there is less consensus on how to solve these problems." The publication of the Conduct of Business Sourcebook (Use of Dealing Commission) Instrument 2005 (final rules) appears to have finally resolved the outstanding issues, putting an end to several years of discussion and revision on the practices of soft commission arrangements (softing) and bundled brokerage (bundling). The final rules restrict the use of dealing commission so that investment managers are allowed to use it only to purchase goods or services related to the execution of trades or the provision of research. To ensure greater transparency of such arrangements, the investment managers will also be required to make prior and periodic disclosure to their customers of the arrangements entered into. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has worked along side the industry and now relies on the industry, to a great extent, to determine the most appropriate means of addressing these issues within the parameters set out by the FSA.

Background

Although different regulatory treatment previously applied to softing (receiving products or services which are paid for by another person) and bundling (including miscellaneous costs in the cost of execution of trades on behalf of a customer), the FSA proceeded on the basis that the two practices had similar economic effects and reviewed them together. The problems with softing and bundling initially came to light as a result of Paul Myners’ review of institutional investment in the United Kingdom (UK). He was concerned that the lack of customer focus on commission costs provides an ‘artificial bias’ for fund managers to choose brokers based on additional services they could acquire from them through the use of commission deriving from the customers’ funds. The inherent conflicts of interest involved raised doubts about the ability of fund managers to achieve best execution for their customers.

Clearly concerned about the risk to their statutory objectives of consumer protection and market confidence and, perhaps, initiated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s own investigation into ‘soft dollar’ arrangements, the FSA undertook a detailed review of softing and bundling resulting in Consultation Paper 176 (CP 176) of April 2003. In that paper, the FSA identified four areas of concern over bundling and softing:

  • This practice enabled fund managers to finance some of their management expenses by charging their customers for commission in a way that was unnecessarily opaque.
  • As the commission costs were subject to less scrutiny by customers, the FSA believed that fund managers were more likely to ‘over-consume’ additional services; overtrade in order to generate sufficient commission flow and/or to select brokers who offered generous bundling or softing terms but who could not necessarily achieve best execution.
  • Customers and competitors did not have sufficient market power to control fund managers’ behaviour in this area.
  • Given their similar economic effects, it was agreed that, in regulatory terms, treating bundling and softing differently was inappropriate.

Consequently, the FSA concluded that market controls were weak in this area and proposed to adopt the following measures to address this market failure:

  • To restrict the goods and services that can be purchased with commission, whether under soft or bundled arrangements.
  • (Radically) in the case of services that could still be bundled or softed, to rebate any commission amounts exceeding the value of the execution of trades to the customer.

CP 176 stimulated a lively debate and a wide range of opinions. The general consensus was that transparency and accountability for fund managers’ expenditure of commission charged to their clients could and should be improved. However, most respondents expressed reservations about the rebate proposal. They considered that it did not take fully into account the broader structural impacts of change and could have unintended adverse consequences for UK fund management and equity trading. To achieve increased transparency and accountability, the FSA considered that three complementary changes were necessary:

  • Fund managers’ use of commission should be limited to the purchase of ‘execution’ and ‘research’.
  • Fund managers should give their clients better information about the respective costs of execution and research, and the overall expenditure on these services.
  • Fund managers should be encouraged to seek, and brokers to provide, clear payment and pricing mechanisms that enable individual services to be purchased separately.

The FSA appreciated that it was for the FSA itself to act on the first of these changes by clarifying what activities should be covered by the terms ‘execution’ and ‘research’ (this was subsequently considered and set out in PS 04/23, November 2004). On the second and third changes, the FSA was persuaded to allow the industry to develop an industry-led solution, based on enhanced disclosure proposal put forward by the Investment Management Association (IMA) in partnership with the London Investment Banking Association (LIBA) and the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF). This enhanced disclose proposal had two elements to it:

  • To modify the existing IMA/NAPF Disclosure Code so that fund managers will be required to provide information to their fund management clients, on a fund-by-fund basis, of the amounts of commission spent on execution and research.
  • To issue good practice guidelines (known as a ‘Statement of Good Practice’ by LIBA) for brokers to identify the execution and research component of dealing commission.

Subsequently in May 2005, the FSA published its draft rules addressing its concerns on soft commission and bundled brokerage arrangements and in July 2005, it issued its final rules. The aim of the FSA’s new rules, together with the industry proposals, is to:

  • limit fund managers’ use of dealing commission to the purchase of ‘execution’ and ‘research’ services
  • require investment managers to disclose to their customers details of how commission payments have been spent and what services have been acquired with them
  • embed in the commercial relationship between fund managers and brokers incentives to secure value for clients for execution and research spend
  • promote competition between those who produce investment research by removing the regulatory distinction between research services provided by brokers along with execution (i.e. bundling) and research services provided by third parties (i.e. softing).

The final rules have been applauded as a successful joint venture between the FSA and the industry and it is hoped that due to the concerted efforts, the rules will be successfully implemented by the industry and will result in the transparency and accountability that was felt to be lacking. The new rules and guidance will come into force from 1 January 2006 with a transitional period. Firms are allowed to continue to comply with the existing soft commission rules until the expiry of any existing soft commission agreement or 30 June 2006 (whichever is earlier).

Scope of the new rules

As a result of the new rules in COB 7.18 on the use of dealing commission, all references to "soft commission" in the FSA’s Sourcebooks will be made redundant. The new rules will apply to investment managers, and not to brokers. Having said that, brokers remain subject to the inducements rule in COB 2.2.3R and Principle for Businesses 1 requiring a firm to conduct its business with integrity. COB 7.18 will apply to investment management transactions carried on in the UK irrespective of the location of the customer.

In summary, COB 7.18 prohibits an investment manager from executing customer orders through a broker for a commission in return for receiving goods or services, unless certain conditions are met. The conditions are that the investment manager must have reasonable grounds to be satisfied that the goods and services:

  • are related to the execution of trades on behalf of the investment managers’ customers, or constitute the provision of research
  • will reasonably assist the investment manager in the provision of its services to its customers and do not, and are not likely to, impair compliance with the duty of the investment manager to act in the best interests of its customers.

Consequently, dealing commission can now be used only for the purchase of goods and services that relate to the execution of trades or the provision of research. Key to this regime are the definitions of the execution of trades and the provision of research. Where the goods or services relate to the execution of trades, the investment manager should be satisfied that they are linked to the arranging and conclusion of a specific investment transaction (or series of related transactions) and they are provided between the point at which the investment manager makes an investment or trading decision and the conclusion of that investment transaction. The FSA has further clarified that post-trade analytics may not be included on a blanket basis in the goods and services which could be acquired with commission. However, the provision of information about how well a broker conducted a particular transaction or series of transactions for an investment manager could be a service within the execution parameter.

Conversely, where the goods or services relate to the provision of research, the FSA believes that ‘originality’ is an essential component of research, which can be purchased with dealing commission. The goods or services that relate to the provision of research must be capable of adding value to the investment or trading decisions by providing new insights that inform the investment manager when making such decisions about customers’ portfolios. It is not enough to merely repackage information that has been presented before, produce information that is commonplace or supply data that has not been analysed or manipulated to provide meaningful conclusions. The FSA has also confirmed that raw data feeds (i.e. price feeds or historical price data that have not been manipulated or analysed in any way) will not be permitted as research services. Crucially, however, the final rules will not apply to research generated internally by the investment manager. The FSA has also provided an indicative list of goods and services that cannot be acquired with dealing commission (e.g. computer hardware, membership fees of professional associations and employees’ salaries).

As is evident from the high-level wording of the new section, the new provisions give investment managers discretion to make reasonable judgments. This principle-based rule-making approach was largely supported by the industry as it was regarded as a practical approach, which would allow investment managers the discretion to determine whether the definitions have been met within defined regulatory parameters. The FSA expects investment managers to be accountable to their customers through the process of explaining these judgements to them in the context of enhanced disclosure under the IMA Disclosure Code. Given that this enhanced disclosure proposal was promoted by the industry, it is likely that it will be effectively policed by the industry, and in so doing ensure accountability. The FSA is yet to determine how performance of the final rules will be measured and is due to meet IMA, NAPF and LIBA before the end of 2005 to discuss this issue.

The final rules represent an overhaul of the previous position as it now limits the investment managers’ use of dealing commission to the purchase of goods and services related to execution and research, in line with the FSA’s initial first proposal. The severity of the FSA’s initial second proposal (to offer a rebate to customers), however, was diluted in the final rules to a mere request to improve transparency by providing customers with better information as to costs incurred for the purchase of execution and research services. The investment manager will be required to make in a timely manner adequate prior and periodic disclosure to its customers of the arrangements for the receipt of goods or services that relate to the execution of trades or the provision of research. The FSA suggested that this could be achieved by, for example, changing the firm’s terms of business. In assessing the adequacy of disclosures made by an investment manager, the FSA will have regard to the extent to which the investment manager adopts disclosure standards developed by industry associations.

What does this mean for an institutional investor? Essentially, it will mean more protection and potentially cheaper dealing costs. The final rules empower the institutional investor as the use of dealing commission arrangements have to be made clear to him, thereby ensuring he makes an informed choice when transacting with an investment manager. It also focuses on achieving best execution for the institutional investor by limiting the scope of factors that may influence the investment manager’s choice of broker, which is ultimately reflected in the execution of trades carried out on behalf of the institutional investor.

What does this mean for an investment manager? Initially, the potential of increased costs as dealing commission may no longer be used to purchase "non-permitted" goods and services, which may remain essential to the investment manager’s business. The investment manager will have to consider how to account for these costs to ensure they remain profitable. It is generally accepted that the investment manager can (and probably will) levy the costs by increasing their management fees. Although this liability will eventually fall to the institutional fund, the enhanced disclosure regime and the fact that investment management accounts are required to be transparent will ensure that the institutional investor will be fully aware of the charges resulting from the transaction and can query these, if need be, with the investment manager. As a result, neither transparency nor accountability is compromised.

Retail funds

In addition, the FSA is currently consulting on the disclosure of dealing commission arrangements in the context of retail investment funds. These funds include authorised unit trusts and open-ended investment companies (OEICs), investment trusts and the managed funds of life assurance companies. Following the FSA’s initial review, it was agreed that the benefits of mandating disclosure of bundled and softed arrangements directly to retail investors would be very limited, and would not justify the likely cost to investment managers. This is because most retail investors have little or no knowledge of the way securities are traded or the kinds of arrangements that exist the in wholesale market to be able to understand the information. Further, due to lack of commercial influence it is unlikely that a retail investor will be able to use the information to challenge the behaviour of the provider, and to secure improvements if necessary. As a result, the FSA could not see a strong case for compulsory disclosure to all retail investors. The FSA has, however, indicated that there are other disclosure-based measures that may be more appropriate in the retail market.

Two proposals were put forward:

  • Firms will be required to publish any disclosure in respect of retail investments and to make it available on request.
  • An individual or a body should act as an investor representative of retail investors by considering the disclosures on their behalf and interacting with the investment manager where necessary.

The investor representative will be expected to have a sufficient degree of expertise, authority, independence and sufficient incentive to perform this task. The FSA is currently consulting for suitable candidates in respect of each investment vehicle. The following persons and bodies have been identified as suitable:

  • For collective investment schemes, the depositary or trustee.
  • For investment trusts, the independent directors of the company.
  • For with-profits funds, the committee or person appointed to review compliance with the PPFM.
  • For unit-linked funds, the with-profits committee, the actuarial function, or the independent directors of the company.

The consultation on these proposals will end on 6 January 2006. Final rules and guidance are likely to become effective from 1 July 2006.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 23/11/2005.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.