UK: Global Diversity in the Enforcement of Liquidated Damages

Last Updated: 30 September 2005
Article by Nicholas Brown

Originally published 14 September 2005

For centuries, business people have been pre-agreeing levels of compensation for breach of their contract. They do this because it helps them to assess the risks involved in the transaction and it simplifies and expedites the resolution of disputes that may arise from non-performance. To varying extents, the jurisprudence of many legal systems supports this behaviour by upholding the agreement of consenting adults.

The differences in approach across different major legal systems offers one very good reason why, where this is legally viable, a considered choice of law selection is important. In any event, the degree of robustness of the courts of any particular jurisdiction on the question of enforceability will go into the mix when assessing general project risk.

Some legal systems rank low on the spectrum of legal certainty in this context. The Civil Code of the United Arab Emirates,1 for instance, permits a court to adjust a liquidated damages provision to bring it in line with the actual results of the relevant breach. The statute is however silent on whether, and if so, how, this judicial discretion is structured, leaving practitioners to speculate on the likely approach of the local judges.

Chinese Law2 gives the people's court and arbitral institutions a similar power of review. If the agreed amount is lower than the loss incurred, the amount may be increased. If the amount is "excessively higher than"3 the loss incurred then there may be an "appropriate reduction". Academic commentators opine that the excessiveness should be determined in light of the actual loss and other circumstances, including difficulties of proof of actual loss and the wilfulness of the breach.

Common Law systems (at least outside of the United States) generally uphold the parties' bargain, except in extreme circumstances. Under the long-serving rule in Dunlop, a decision of the House of Lords, the enforceability issue requires the court to ask whether, at the time the parties entered into the contract, the prime contractual function of the provision was to deter a party from breaking the contract or to compensate the innocent party for breach.

In reality, parties seldom come out and say that they are stipulating a sum (or rate) of liquidated damages primarily as a deterrent, and so courts will look for other indications of the objective purpose of the provision.

In this area, the key issue tends to be just how important it is that the liquidated sum (or rate) is much higher (or lower) than the loss that might be sustained if breach occurred. The Dunlop ruling attributes importance to such a disparity only where the agreed amount is extravagant and unconscionable in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivable be proved to have followed from the breach. The Singaporean case of Hong Leong Finance Ltd,4 illustrates the rule in action. In that case, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that a default interest rate of an extra 11.25% (from 6.75% for the third year onwards increased to 18% after default) was unenforceable under the Dunlop rule. More recently, in the Jeancharm,5 case, the English Court of Appeal struck down an annual default interest rate of 260%.

With some consistency, courts in England and other common law jurisdictions, such as Australia,6 Hong Kong7 and Singapore,8 have viewed the existence of such a disparity, i.e. between the liquidated amount and the loss that might be sustained if breach occurred, as relevant but inconclusive. Such a discrepancy does not necessary render the provision unenforceable, since a range of factors interact to determine the basic commercial purpose of the provision.

This is a principle that comes under challenge from time to time. Indeed, in the very recent case of Murray v Leisureplay Plc,9 one of a three-member panel of the English Justice Court of Appeal appeared to reinterpret the Dunlop as saying that if parties agree that a party in breach of contract shall pay an unjustifiable amount in the event of a breach of contract, their agreement is to that extent unenforceable. Under this view, a liquidated damages provision would be unenforceable if the basis for calculation was a genuine, yet mistaken, view as to what would be recoverable for the breach at common law. Were this approach to have won the day then business people would need to secure much greater involvement of legal counsel in their commercial negotiations on liability figures. It is a good thing, and not surprising, that the other members of the court did not support this view.

The position remains under English Law that, to be enforceable, the provision must be compensatory rather than deterrent. It is not conclusive of which side of the line the provision falls that the amount stipulated is not an accurate statement of the loss, provided it is not extravagant or unconscionable, having regard to the range of losses that it could reasonably be anticipated it would have to cover at the time the contact was made.

The position in the United States is complicated. Suffice it to say, there is a divergence in the approach of the US courts as to the conclusiveness of a discrepancy.10 Where United States Law tends to differ from the English Law approach is that courts are encouraged to consider not only the anticipated loss flowing from the breach, at the time the parties enter their contract, but also the actual loss flowing from the breach.10 In other words, when considering the reasonableness of the provision, the courts will look at the contracting parties' projections at the time of contracting, as well as the ultimate loss and damage sustained by the innocent party. Under the English approach, there is no scope for an after-the-event comparison against the actual results of the relevant breach.


1 Article 390 of Federal Law No. 5 of 1985 (Civil Transactions Law).

2 Article 114 of Contract Law (zongze).

3 Gu Angran, Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Hetongfa Jianghua, 1999, page 49; Bing Ling, Contract Law in China, 2002, page 453.

4 Hong Leong Finance Ltd v. Tan Gin Huay [1999] 2 SLR 153.

5 Jeancharm Ltd (t/a Beaver International) v Barnet Football Club Ltd [2003] 92 Con LR 26 (English Court of Appeal).

6 AMEC-UDC Finance Ltd v. Austin (1986) 162 CLR 170; Esanda Finance Cord Ltd v. Plessnig (1989) 166 CLR 131.

7 Hong Kong Institute of Education v. Aoki Corp (No 2) [2004] 2 HKC 397

8 Hong Leong Finance Ltd v. Tan Gin Huay [1999] 2 SLR 153.

9 Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963, English Court of Appeal.

10 Restatement (Second) of Contracts, § 356 cmt. 6 (1981).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.