UK: The reinsurance implications of Hurricane Katrina

Last Updated: 20 September 2005
Article by Vere Wheatley and Karen Brymer

Hurricane Katrina is widely being described as the costliest natural catastrophe in history with estimates of insured damage ranging between $35billion and $60 billion. It will undoubtedly have a huge impact on the global and London reinsurance markets. This article briefly considers some of the key reinsurance issues which we anticipate will arise out of Katrina including the extent to which insurers are able to bind their reinsurers to follow their settlements and the extent to which an insurer can aggregate Katrina claims.

To view the full article in full please see below:


Full Article

Introduction

Hurricane Katrina is widely being described as the costliest natural catastrophe in history with estimates of insured damage ranging between $35billion and $60 billion. It will undoubtedly have a huge impact on the global and London reinsurance markets. This article briefly considers some of the key reinsurance issues which we anticipate will arise out of Katrina including the extent to which insurers are able to bind their reinsurers to follow their settlements and the extent to which an insurer can aggregate Katrina claims.

Insurance issues

The major insurance claims are expected to result from damage to on shore and offshore energy installations in the Gulf of Mexico, property damage and business interruption. The starting point for these insurers (and exposed reinsurers) is going to be the cause of the underlying loss and relevant policy exclusions. Alternative causes will include the hurricane itself, the swell/tidal surge and (in the case of New Orleans) the flooding caused by the levee breaches (assuming neither of the latter are attributable to the hurricane). Some $10bn is said to turn on this issue – primarily because the typical US household policies in the areas affected by Katrina (specifically New Orleans) do not cover flood damage.

As only half of homeowners bought the required second (flood) policy through the National Flood Insurance Programme the rest will be wholly or partially uninsured unless the cause of their loss is found to be the hurricane. This has caused commentators to point to the potential risk of either legislative/judicial intervention to bring uninsured losses within existing policies along the lines seen in Florida following the damage caused by the four hurricanes of 20041. Other insurance issues are likely to include whether a grace period will be allowed for premiums to be paid on National Flood Insurance Programme policies and the computation of business interruption claims.

Reinsurance issues

For obvious reasons, the reinsurance industry will be watching closely as the direct market resolves these issues. Very quickly thereafter, insurers will turn their attention to recovering from their reinsurers - domestic and international. We highlight below where we anticipate English law will be relevant.

The majority of the reinsurances written by London market reinsurers of the direct carriers in the homeowners/commercial property market will probably be subject to US arbitration provisions/US law. However, a high proportion of the retrocession protections purchased by London market (direct) reinsurers are likely to be governed English law. This is also likely to be true of the reinsurances of the London market participants on direct commercial property and energy risks. There will obviously be exceptions such as where the reinsurer benefits from group protections.

The legal (recovery) rights of these cedants under English law will depend on their ability to demonstrate liability for the underlying losses (and whether the claim has been paid pursuant to an award/judgment or by way of a settlement at a level purporting to reflect the insurer's potential legal liability will be fundamental to this issue) and the contractual provisions which govern the extent to which they have to prove that liability (i.e. whether there is a follow the settlements provision or not and if so, what kind). A concern reinsurers are likely to have in relation to Katrina claims is that settlements are not related to legal liability. This is particularly the case in the direct property (homeowners/commercial) market where the political/economic pressure to release insurance funds to rebuild is palpable and the possibility of a bad faith suit following a rejected claim is high. We consider briefly below the contractual provisions which will affect the ability of a reinsured to recover a settlement and the impact of the reinsurance being silent on this issue.

The extent to which cedants can recover from their reinsurers (and the number of deductibles payable) will also be dependent on whether the basis of aggregation accords with the policy wording.

Settlements and reinsurance recoveries

The inclusion of some form of "follow the settlements" provision in a reinsurance is intended to speed up the process of recovering on settlement payments (such that a reinsured is not required to prove actual liability and quantum in order to recover).

Wordings vary. The broadest forms of wording are often found in facultative reinsurances (e.g. "Being a reinsurance of and warranted same…terms and conditions as and to follow the settlements of ..") and (where written) proportional treaties (e.g. "follow the fortunes"). In these cases, the interests of the insurers and reinsurers are broadly the same which means that (subject to what is said below) it will generally be easier for a reinsured to bind its reinsurers to its settlements. Non proportional treaties (where the terms of the reinsurance may not be the same as the underlying and the interests of the parties less aligned), commonly employ more onerous provisions giving the reinsurer more scope to reopen the underlying claim before payment (e.g. "All loss settlements by the reinsured shall be binding upon reinsurers provided that such settlements are within the terms and conditions of the original policies and within the terms and conditions of this policy..").

As a matter of general principle, under the terms of the language referred to immediately above, a reinsured will be able to require its reinsurer to follow its Katrina settlement provided two basic requirements are met. First, the claim must fall within the risks covered by the policy of reinsurance (and if the contract says so - the insurance also –see above) as a matter of law. Whilst there is a question mark over the proximate cause of the underlying loss ie. hurricane or flood, which will determine whether or not the reinsurance responds (say there is a flood exclusion), a reinsurer may look to resist payment under the follow provision on this basis. Second, the insurer must have acted honestly and taken all proper and businesslike steps in making the settlement. This may not be the case if on examination, it becomes apparent that an insurer bowed to intense political/commercial pressure and paid a claim where there was in fact a valid defence or paid too much. Whilst the above provides some guidance, close consideration must always be given to the actual wording used as this will ultimately govern the position on settlements in each case.

In the event that there is no follow provision in a reinsurance policy wording, it will be incumbent on the settling reinsured to provide a reinsurer with evidence sufficient to prove its legal liability and quantum and a reinsurer will in theory be able to take any points against an insurer that would have been available to it during its settlement negotiations with the original insured. Generally speaking, a court judgment/arbitration award will be sufficient proof of legal liability and quantum. Thus, if an (hurricane) insurer is sued in the US courts and unsuccessfully defends a claim on the basis that the proximate cause of the loss is flood (which is an excluded peril under the policy), the US court judgment in which the insurer is found to be liable (on the basis that the proximate cause of the loss was in fact the hurricane) is likely to be sufficient to establish liability for the purpose of recovering under a reinsurance governed by English law2.

Reinsureds must also be careful to ensure that any settlement is drafted in a way that it demonstrates their liability and the amount of that liability has been properly ascertained.3

Aggregation of Katrina claims

The second main issue for the reinsurance market is likely be the extent to which insurers can aggregate their Katrina claims so as to limit the number of deductibles payable. Catastrophe excess of loss policies usually incorporate hours clauses. Because the duration of Hurricane Katrina exceeded the usual 72 hours for a hurricane loss, insurers may seek to divide their Hurricane Katrina losses in to two or more loss occurrences (presumably paying two deductibles) if they have enough cover and their wording allows this. Further, if (as has been suggested by RMS in the US), the flooding of New Orleans was caused by the failure of the city's flood defences and not the hurricane itself, then losses deriving from the flood may constitute a separate loss occurrence (subject to a different period of cover – commonly 168 hours).

Hurricane Katrina losses might also be presented under a whole account reinsurance which does not contain an hours clause but retains the "event" based aggregation wording. Lord Mustill, a leading insurance judge, said in AXA v Field4 that "in ordinary speech, an event is something which happens at a particular time, at a particular place and in a particular way". Katrina hit the US at two different times (25th/ 29th August) at two different places (Florida/the Gulf Coast) and in two different ways (first as a category 1 then as a category 4 hurricane). This could give rise to questions as to whether there were two "events". As could the issue whether the New Orleans flooding (as caused by the breach of the levees) is a separate "event" (to Hurricane Katrina).

Different considerations will apply where a protection employs the broader "originating cause" wording (as opposed to "event") as the basis for aggregation or it includes language which allows the reinsured to be the sole judge of a loss event.

Conclusion

Hurricane Katrina is expected to have a far greater impact on the London reinsurance market than all four hurricanes of 2004 combined. While all members of the market will wish to play their crucial part in the reconstruction efforts following Katrina, they will need to bear in mind the issues rehearsed in this article, and carefully consider the language of their inward and outward policies, as part of that process.

Footnotes

1. An appellate court's interpretation of Florida's "Valued Policy" Law in the decision of Mierzwa v Florida Windstorm Underwriting Association effectively required windstorm damage insurers to pay up to the full value of their policy even where windstorm was responsible for only a fraction of the damage to the property.

2. The exceptions will be where a) in the eyes of the English Court, the court or tribunal was not of competent jurisdiction b) the judgment was in breach of an exclusive jurisdiction clause or other clause by which the insured was contractually excluded form proceedings in that court, c) that the reinsured has failed to take all proper defences available to it; and d) the judgment of the foreign court was "manifestly perverse" (Commercial Union v NRG Victory [1998] 2 Lloyds Rep 600).

3. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co v. Bovis Land Lease Ltd (2004) EWHC 2197.

4. [1996] 3 ALL ER 517

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 19/09/2005.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.