ARTICLE
30 September 2014

Liquidated Damages: When To Assess Whether They Are A "Genuine Pre-Estimate Of Loss"

Ensuring your rates of liquidated damages are a "genuine pre-estimate of loss" is no longer enough to ensure that they will not later be held to be a penalty.
United Kingdom Corporate/Commercial Law

Ensuring your rates of liquidated damages ("LADs") are a "genuine pre-estimate of loss" at the time you enter into a construction contract is no longer enough to ensure that they will not later be held to be a penalty and therefore unenforceable.

In Unaoil Ltd v Leighton Offshore Pte Ltd [2014] EWHC 2965 (Comm) a rate of LADs was agreed between the parties in relation to a contract which was subsequently varied and the value of the contract reduced. No change was made to the agreed rate of LADs at the time of the variation. Eder J in the Commercial Court held that even though the agreed rate of LADs may have been a genuine pre-estimate of loss at the time of the contract, the rate of LADs was penal and therefore unenforceable as the agreed rate of LADs could not have been a genuine pre-estimate of the losses which might be suffered under the varied contract.

Consequently, when varying contracts parties need to be aware that they may inadvertently be rendering pre-agreed positions on LADs unenforceable if the nature of variation is relevant to the losses a party is likely to incur.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More