UK: Sector Focus: Recent Developments In The Special Administration Regime For NHS Trusts And NHS Foundation Trusts

Last Updated: 15 August 2014
Article by Emma Lloyd

Summary and implications


In May 2013, we reported on the origins of the trust special administration regime for NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts [/insight/briefings/2013/may/sector-focus-the-legislative-framework-for-nhs-trust-insolvency/].

Since inception, the regime has been used only twice. Firstly, over South London Healthcare NHS Trust ("SLHT") and secondly, over Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust ("MSFT").

Below, we have commented on the key aspects of the trust special administration process at SLHT and MSFT. We have also discussed the latest developments and areas for reform, including the recent amendments introduced in the Care Act 2014 and an update on the Government's plans for a health special administration regime for companies providing NHS funded services.

Recap on the legislative framework

The special administration process was introduced in Chapter 5A of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended by the Health Act 2009). It made provision for the appointment of a TSA over an NHS trust, where the Secretary of State for Health considered it in the interests of the health service.

The key objective of a TSA appointed to an NHS trust is to develop and consult locally on a draft report and make recommendations to the Secretary of State for Health in a final report about what should happen to the trust and the services it provides to ensure the continued provision of key services (location specific services). The legal framework sets out a maximum period of 120 working days for completion of the process (unless extended by order of the Secretary of State), by which time the Secretary of State must make a final decision on the future of the NHS trust following the TSA's recommendations.

The Health and Social Care Act 2012 extended the scope of the regime to foundation trusts, enabling the sector regulator for health services in England (Monitor) to appoint a TSA where the foundation trust is, or is likely to become, unable to pay its debts.  The legal framework applicable to foundation trusts is very similar to NHS trusts, although the timetable is longer to enable Monitor to be consulted (a period of 150 days, unless extended).

South London Healthcare NHS Trust

As previously reported, SLHT was formed on 1 April 2009 by merging three hospitals. At the time of the merger, these hospitals had a combined deficit of £21.3m. Following the merger, SLHT ran up debts of more than £150m to become the most financially challenged trust in the NHS. As well as inheriting the financial difficulties of its three predecessor hospitals, six PFI schemes operated across the three main sites, adding to its deficit.

As a result, SLHT was judged by the Department of Health to be "not financially viable in its current form" and Matthew Kershaw was appointed the first ever TSA on 16 July 2012.

In accordance with the statutory timetable, on 1 February 2013 the Secretary of State for Health, Jeremy Hunt, made the final decision on the future of SLHT (following on from the recommendations made by the TSA in his final report). Ultimately, it was decided that:

  • SLHT should be dissolved and its services transferred to other providers including King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust.
  • All vacant or poorly utilised premises should be vacated and sold where possible.
  • The Department of Health should pay the excess costs of the PFI buildings at the Queen Elizabeth and Princess Royal Hospitals and write off the accumulated debt of SLHT so that the other providers are not saddled with historic debts. The Department of Health also agreed to negotiate an appropriate level of transitional funding to cover implementation.

Importantly, it was also decided that services at Lewisham hospital would be downgraded. This was significant because Lewisham hospital was part of the neighbouring Lewisham Healthcare NHS Trust and did not fall within the remit of SLHT.

A back-door approach to reconfiguration?

The London Borough of Lewisham and a local campaign group called Save Lewisham Hospital applied for judicial review of the TSA's recommendations to scale back services offered at their local hospital and of the Secretary of State's decision to accept those recommendations. The judicial review application was brought on the basis that each NHS trust is a separate legal entity and that the Secretary of State had appointed the TSA only in relation to SLHT.

Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal held that the powers of a TSA appointed over an NHS trust were confined to that particular trust. The TSA's final report and the Secretary of State's decision were held to be ultra vires to the extent that they made recommendations about or affected the services provided by Lewisham Healthcare NHS trust at Lewisham hospital. In his leading judgment, Lord Justice Sullivan held that:

"... if Parliament wishes a TSA appointed in respect of a particular Trust to make recommendations for action, not merely in relation to that Trust, but in relation to any Trust within all or part of the region in which the Trust is located, then it must expressly say so."

The decision to make detrimental changes at Lewisham hospital (part of a solvent trust) sparked a fierce debate at both parliamentary and local level about the powers of a TSA to make recommendations in relation to neighbouring trusts to which the TSA had not been appointed. Many critics argued that the trust special administration process could be used as a weapon to reconfigure the health service without proper consultation.

As a result of the judicial review proceedings, amendments to Chapter 5A of the National Health Service Act 2006 were proposed in the passage of the Care Bill. The Care Bill recently received Royal Assent to become the Care Act 2014 (see further below).   

Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust

Against a backdrop of high levels of patient mortality and poor standards of care, Monitor appointed an independent Contingency Planning Team (CPT) from Ernst & Young LLP to MSFT in October 2012. In January 2013, the CPT concluded in a report for Monitor that, despite improvements in clinical performance, MSFT was both clinically and financially unsustainable in its current form. In a subsequent report, the CPT advised that neither MSFT nor local commissioners would be able to deliver the changes required, and consequently recommended the appointment of administrators.

On 16 April 2013, Monitor appointed Alan Bloom and Alan Hudson (both insolvency practitioners from Ernst & Young LLP) and Professor Hugo Mascie-Taylor (a consultant geriatrician and former medical director of the NHS Confederation), as TSAs over MSFT. It was the first time that an NHS foundation trust had been put into special administration.

Following an extension granted by Monitor to finalise the draft recommendations, the formal consultation period for MSFT commenced on 6 August 2013 and finished on 1 October 2013. The TSA consulted widely with local clinicians, patients, staff, local residents and their representatives in Parliament and on local councils. The TSA's final report was due to be submitted to Monitor on 22 October 2013 but Monitor extended the reporting period by 40 working days. This extension gave time for Monitor to hold extensive discussions with NHS England, University Hospitals of North Staffordshire NHS Trust and the NHS Trust Development Authority.

In line with the special administration timetable, the TSAs submitted their final report to Monitor on 17 December 2013 and it was published the following day. The TSAs recommended that MSFT should be dissolved and (a) Stafford Hospital should be operated by the University of North Staffordshire NHS Trust and (b) Cannock Chase Hospital should be operated by Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust.

On 16 January 2014, Monitor approved the final report and it passed to the Secretary of State to make his final decision. On 26 February 2014, the Secretary of State approved the TSAs' principal recommendation to dissolve MSFT. It is likely that the transfer of services and the dissolution of MSFT will take place at the start of November 2014. The Department of Health has agreed to underwrite the bulk of the costs of the transition.

The Care Act 2014 – extending the remit of TSAs

One of the main criticisms of the decision in SLHT was that the TSA made recommendations in relation to a neighbouring trust that was not under his remit. The amendments introduced in the Care Act 2014 have sought to combat this by allowing a TSA to make recommendations and Monitor/the Secretary of State to take decisions that do not only affect the trust under special administration. This will include where the action affects neighbouring, solvent trusts and which is "necessary for and consequential on" action taken in relation to the falling trust.

Whilst the majority of the provisions are not yet in force, the Care Act 2014 has also introduced (amongst other things):

  • an extension to the special administration timetable so that (i) TSAs are now given 65 working days from appointment to publish their draft report (previously 45 working days from appointment); and (ii) the consultation period is extended from 30 working days to 40 working days. 
  • an obligation on the TSA to consult (i) other NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts affected by wider recommendations, their staff and their commissioners; (ii) any local authority in whose area the trust in administration and other affected trusts are located; and (iii) any Local Healthwatch organisation in the area of any local authority.
  • a greater role for the Care Quality Commission in the case of foundation trusts to deal with quality and safety failure, by (i) requiring that Monitor appoint a TSA where the Care Quality Commission is satisfied that there is a serious failure by an NHS foundation trust to provide services that are of sufficient quality; and (ii) requiring Monitor to consult more widely with the Care Quality Commission, such as prior to publishing guidance. In addition, TSAs may not provide their draft report to Monitor before obtaining a statement from the Care Quality Commission that it considers that the recommendations in the draft report would achieve the sufficient safety and quality of the services.

Government response to the proposed Health Special Administration regime

As previously reported, the Health and Social Care Act 2012 introduced the concept of a health special administration (HSA) regime for independent providers of NHS funded services (including registered and unregistered companies and community interest companies). The statutory provisions were intended to provide an alternative corporate insolvency procedure for companies to ensure that patients receive uninterrupted services if the provider becomes insolvent.

The detail of the HSA regime was set out in draft regulations. The Department of Health invited comments on the proposed regime through a public consultation, which ran between 1 November 2012 and 4 January 2013.  

On 4 April 2014, the Department of Health published its response to the consultation. In short, having considered whether such a regime is needed at this time (given Monitor's powers of intervention to safeguard essential services before the point of insolvency); the Government has decided not to proceed with its proposals to introduce an HSA regime through secondary legislation. Rather, if an independent provider of essential services becomes insolvent, the standard insolvency processes under the Insolvency Act 1986 will continue to apply.

In their formal response to the consultation, the Department of Health confirmed that there is currently not enough available data on which services provided by independent providers are considered to be commissioner-requested services. This information is essential in informing whether an HSA regime is in fact needed, how it might operate in practice or whether alternative provision is required in the absence of an HSA regime.

The Department of Health has not ruled out introducing an HSA regime or alternative provision (including the possibility of a risk pool) at a later date. However, for the time being, the Government considers the risks associated with not having an HSA regime are manageable.

Casualties in the hospital sector

The trust special administration of SLHT and MSFT demonstrates that hospital trusts are a highly fragile sector. The amendments to the regime introduced in the Care Act 2014 are not intended to be applied retrospectively. Therefore the decision to dissolve SLHT and MSFT will not be reversed. However, going forward, the Government and Monitor will be looking for ways to provide more cost effective services for patients whilst maintaining quality of care.

The use of CPTs, whereby a team of experts is appointed to explore wide-ranging solutions to resolve a trust's financial problems, is increasing. In addition to the CPT appointed at MSFT, Monitor appointed a CPT at Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in February 2013; a CPT will also shortly begin work at Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust; and it was announced in May 2014 that the University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust had agreed to appoint a turnaround director to help it deal with its short-term financial problems.

It therefore seems that more casualties in the wider health economy are likely.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.