UK: Renewal Tenancy Refused Due To Breaches

(Youssefi v Mussellwhite)
Last Updated: 22 July 2014
Article by Emma Humphreys and Georgina Redsell

The Facts and Decision at First Instance

The landlord opposed the grant of a new tenancy to the tenant on the following grounds of section 30(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954:

  • Ground (a): failure to repair and maintain the premises;
  • Ground (b): persistent delay in paying rent; and
  • Ground (c): other substantial breaches of the lease and other reasons connected with the tenant's use or management of the premises. (Namely, the tenant's failure to provide access and breaches of the user covenants in the lease).

As these grounds are discretionary, the landlord also needed to show that the tenant "ought not" to be granted a new tenancy in light of these breaches.

The Judge found that in respect of eight alleged items of disrepair, only the presence of a creeper growth on the rear external wall of the building was substantial enough for the purposes of ground (a). Whilst this was not a breach of the tenant's repairing covenant, the Judge held that it was a sufficiently serious breach of an implied obligation to use the premises in a "tenant like manner" and this, taken with the state of decoration of the ground floor of the premises and other factors regarding the tenant's behaviour, justified not granting a new lease. The landlord was also successful in relying on ground (c) because the tenant had persistently refused to allow the landlord access to inspect the premises in breach of her lease and had failed to use the premises as a shop within one of the designated use classes specified in the lease. The delay in paying rent was held as insufficient to establish ground (b).

The tenant appealed the decision on grounds (a) and (c).

Court of Appeal Decision

Whether in light of the breaches the tenant "ought not to" be granted a new Tenancy

The Court of Appeal found that when deciding whether a fresh tenancy "ought not" to be granted, this question was to be considered in respect of each ground separately:

Ground (a): the Court must ask itself whether in light of the state of repair of the premises brought about by the tenant's breaches of covenant the tenant "ought not" to be granted a new tenancy. In approaching this question, the Court should focus exclusively on the state of repair of the premises and determine - looking forward to the new hypothetical term - whether the proper interests of the landlord would be prejudiced by continuing with the same tenant.

Ground (b): similarly, the focus should be on the persistent delay in paying rent and nothing else.

Ground (c): the approach is broader as the Court can look not only at other substantial breaches but also any other reason connected to the tenant's use or management of the premises.

The Court held that it is unnecessary for a landlord to prove that the relevant breach adversely affects its rental income or the value of the landlord's interest as this would be an inappropriate constraint on the wide discretion given to the Court.

Ground (a): Disrepair

The Court of Appeal overturned the Judge's decision in relation to ground (a). The Court found that, although the tenant may have had a responsibility to keep down weeds in the garden and control plants generally, the failure to keep in check the unrestricted plant growth on the rear wall of the building was not a breach of the tenant's repairing covenant. Moreover, even if this had been a breach of the tenant's repairing obligation, it was accepted that a tenant's failure to repair has to be substantial for the purposes of ground (a) and the situation here was not a substantial breach given that the cost of carrying out the work to remedy the breach was £350.

Ground (c): Other substantial breaches and other reasons

Breach of access covenant

The Court of Appeal upheld the first instance decision in respect of ground (c) on the basis that it was clear from the evidence that the tenant had thwarted attempts on behalf of the landlord to access the premises on numerous occasions. The Court also found that it was irrelevant to the consideration as to whether these breaches were substantial that the landlord had admitted that she did not want to renew the tenancy as she wanted to sell the property with vacant possession because she had become exasperated with all of the issues surrounding the tenancy. Similarly, the fact that the landlord was unable to show any loss from the tenant's breaches was also irrelevant and in any event it was obvious from the evidence that the landlord would have incurred abortive surveyors' fees in respect of the attempted inspections.

Breach of user covenant: the failure to open the premises as a shop

The Court of Appeal also upheld the first instance finding that the use of the premises for the preparation of cold meals off the premises did not fall within the use classes specified in the lease. It agreed that this breach of user was substantial and that the tenant ought therefore not to be granted a new tenancy. It was considered highly relevant that the tenant had made no attempt to operate her business within the use classes specified in the lease within the 3 years since she had been notified by the landlord of the breach.

The Court of Appeal found that it was not incumbent on the landlord to show a quantifiable loss to the value of her interest in the premises as a result of the breach of user in order to demonstrate that the tenant "ought not" to be granted a new tenancy; it was open to the Court to find that the breach was prejudicial to the legitimate interests of the landlord in the absence of any evidence to the contrary by the tenant. It was not hard to envisage, for example, that a sale of the landlord's interest with a business tenant in possession would achieve a better price if the tenant was conducting a user compliant business.


Situations such as this one will not often arise but it is a useful reminder for landlords of the possible other grounds of opposition available under the 1954 Act that may be relied upon if there are substantial subsisting breaches of covenant when considering serving a section 25 notice or a counter-notice to a tenant's section 26 request. In addition, tenants should be alive to the risks of not taking steps to remedy their breaches of lease.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Emma Humphreys
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
BrookStreet des Roches
BrookStreet des Roches
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
BrookStreet des Roches
BrookStreet des Roches
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions