UK: Court Of Appeal Gives Revised Guidance On Court’s Attitude To Non-Compliance With Civil Procedure Rules

Last Updated: 16 July 2014
Article by Bob Deering and David Richards

Denton & Others v. White & Others [2014] EWCA CIV 906

We reported in the Spring 2014 E-Brief on the civil litigation reforms that came into force in England and Wales in April 2013 (the "Jackson Reforms") and their impact on commercial litigation in the English courts. One of the key aims of the Jackson Reforms was to promote a new culture of avoiding delay in English court cases, thus saving legal costs.

In November 2013, in the now famous Mitchell v. Newsgroup Newspapers, the Court of Appeal sent shock waves through the legal community with its tough approach to cases of non-compliance with the Court's rules.

In Mitchell, the Court of Appeal advocated a two stage approach for deciding whether a party should be granted relief from sanctions for non-compliance with the Court's rules, practice directions or orders, as follows:

  1. Can the non-compliance properly be regarded as trivial? If so, relief from sanctions would be appropriate.
  2. If the non-compliance is not trivial, then the burden is on the defaulting party to persuade the Court that there are good reasons to grant relief.

Post Mitchell

Following the decision in Mitchell, there were a number of cases at first instance in which judges sought to apply the guidance in Mitchell to applications for relief from sanctions. The contradictory approaches taken by the different judges in those cases – some of which were seen as unduly harsh whilst others were more lenient – led to confusion amongst court users as to the approach that the Court would take in future cases. The potential for the Court to impose tough sanctions for relatively minor procedural breaches, including the striking out of claims or defences, led to a lack of cooperation between litigants in the hope of securing an advantage where one party fell into breach. This led to an increase in litigation and thereby costs, precisely the opposite of what the Jackson Reforms were intended to achieve.


The fall-out from Mitchell needed to be resolved and, on 4 July 2014, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to hear three appeals concurrently, all relating to cases in which one of the parties was seeking relief from sanctions. The head of the Court of Appeal, Lord Dyson, gave the leading judgment.

Lord Dyson stated that the guidance in Mitchell remained substantially sound but had been misinterpreted and so the Court would reinstate the approach that should be applied in future cases. Applications for relief from sanctions should now be approached in three stages as follows:

  1. Identify and assess the seriousness and significance of the failure to comply with the relevant rule, practice direction or court order. If the breach is neither serious nor significant, then relief should be granted.
  2. If the breach is serious or significant, consider why the default occurred.
  3. Evaluate all the circumstances of the case to ensure that the Court deals with the matter justly, but with particular weight to be given to the requirements under Civil Procedure Rule ("CPR") 3.9 that (a) litigation must be conducted efficiently and at proportionate cost and (b) the Court must enforce compliance with rules, practice directions and orders.

The main change to the hard line in Mitchell – and applied in many subsequent decisions – relates to the guidance given by Lord Dyson as to how judges should now approach the first stage. Instead of considering whether the breach is "trivial", the Court should now consider whether the breach is serious or significant. A useful test of whether a breach has been serious or significant is whether it has imperilled future hearing dates or otherwise disrupted the conduct of the litigation or other litigation generally. Lord Dyson also made it clear that an assessment of the seriousness or significance of a breach should not involve, at the first stage, an assessment of the general conduct of the parties.

The majority of the Court of Appeal (Lord Dyson and Lord Vos) were of the view that the two factors described in CPR 3.9 should be given particular importance and particular weight at the third stage when the Court considers all the circumstances of the case. The other judge, Lord Jackson himself, disagreed with the majority on this point, stating that although CPR 3.9 required the Court to consider those two factors in every case, it did not require that any special weight be attached to them.

Lord Dyson also dealt with a concern raised by the legal profession that the Jackson Reforms and the Mitchell decision had encouraged non-cooperation between litigators. Lord Dyson made it clear that it would be inappropriate for litigants or their lawyers to take advantage of mistakes made by opposing parties in the hope that relief from sanctions would be denied and that they would obtain some litigation advantage. He stated that it would be "very much the exceptional case where a contested application for relief from sanctions is necessary" and that the courts will be more ready in the future to penalise opportunism. In particular, Lord Dyson suggested that heavy costs sanctions could be imposed by the courts on parties who behave unreasonably in refusing to agree extensions of time or unreasonably oppose applications for relief from sanctions. Lord Dyson also stated that that, if a culture of compliance was to be encouraged, then judges must ensure that the directions given at the outset of the case are realistic and achievable.

The Court of Appeal accordingly reached the following conclusions on the three cases before it:-

  • In Denton,the parties had served all their witness statements but, 18 months later, the Defendant sought to serve a further six statements. At first instance, the Court granted relief from sanctions for late service of evidence and, as a consequence, the trial was adjourned.

The Court of Appeal reversed the Judge's decision because the breach was significant in that it caused the trial date to be vacated and there was no good reason for the breach.

  • In Decadent Vapours Ltd v. Bevan and others, the Claimant failed to pay court fees on time because the cheque was delayed in the post. At first instance, the Court refused to grant relief from sanctions and the Claimant's case was struck out.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal because the breach was "near the bottom of the range of seriousness" and the breach did not cause problems to the efficient conduct of the litigation at proportionate cost.

In Utilise TDS Limited v. Davies and others,the Claimant filed a costs budget 45 minutes late in breach of a court order and was 13 days late in notifying the Court of the outcome of certain settlement negotiations. At first instance, the court struck out the claim.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal as the delay in filing the budget was neither serious nor significant and did not imperil any future hearing date or the conduct of the litigation or any other litigation.


The decision in Mitchell and the harsh approach taken by some judges to even minor breaches in reliance on the Mitchell case has caused great concern.

Two things in particular stand out from the Denton decision. First, that the Court of Appeal wants to start again in terms of its guidance on the correct approach to applications for relief from sanctions. Lord Dyson stated expressly as follows: "We hope that what follows will avoid the need in future to resort to the earlier authorities." Second, the warning that only in an "exceptional case" should a litigant oppose an application for relief. Whilst this might indicate a softening of approach, any party to English litigation must keep in mind that the courts remain determined to stamp out delay and non-compliance with procedural requirements.

The clarification from the Court of Appeal in Denton as to the proper approach to be taken in future cases is very welcome. It now remains to be seen how the new guidance will be applied in practice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.