UK: Freedom of Contract and the Right to Payment After Determination

Last Updated: 17 January 2005
Article by Kenny Valentine

Originally published November 2004

In a surprising decision the Court of Session in Scotland in the case of Melville Dundas Limited v George Wimpey UK Limited (and another) [22 October 2004] has underlined the fundamental freedom of contract, which parties to a construction contract enjoy, to agree the final date when sums due under the contract become payable. This newsflash identifies a perceived tension between this decision and previous Appeal Court decisions in Scotland and England. Continued on reverse

The factual background

Melville Dundas ("the Contractor") was engaged by Wimpey ("the Employer") to carry out a housing development subject to the Standard Form of Building Contract issued by the Scottish Building Contracts Committee. This contract incorporates, subject to certain amendments, the JCT Standard Form of Building Contract (1998 Edition). It was accepted by the parties that the Contractor had received a Valuation from the Employer's agent in respect of an interim application in the sum of circa £400,000. It was accepted by the Employer that no valid notice of withholding had been issued. It was therefore accepted by the Employer that, everything else being equal, the sum of £400,000 was due to have been paid to the Contractor no later than 16 May 2003, the final date for payment.

It was also a matter of agreement between the parties that as at 22 May 2003, an insolvency event occurred, namely, Melville Dundas had receivers appointed.

The contractual provisions

It was provided that, as is common to many standard forms, in the event of insolvency, payment obligations are suspended until the Employer has completed the works and a balancing of accounts is carried out. Specifically, in Clause 27, it was provided:

" [on the occurrence of an insolvency event] the provisions of this Contract which require any further payment or any release or further release of Retention to the Contractor shall not apply; provided that [this clause] shall not be construed as to prevent the enforcement by the Contractor of any rights under this Contract in respect of amounts properly due to be paid by the Employer to the Contractor which the Employer has unreasonably not paid and which… have accrued 28 days or more before the date the Employer could first give notice to determine the employment of the Contractor."

It was a matter of agreement between the parties that the date when the Employer could first have given notice to determine the Employment of the Contractor was 22 May 2003.

The employer's argument

The position of the Employer was straightforward. It contended that the provisions meant that, while the Contractor was entitled to demand payment of sums which had become due and which had accrued to him at least 28 days before 22 May 2003, i.e. the first day upon which the Employer could have given the necessary notice, payment of sums which had not become due and accrued to the Contractor by that time, could no longer be demanded by the Contractor. The sum which the Contractor sued for, in the present case, had not accrued to the Contractor, at least 28 days before the first day on which notice of determination by the Employer could have been given, accruing as it did on 16 May 2003. Accordingly the Contractor was not presently entitled to payment.

The Contractor's Argument

The Contractor accepted, before the court, that if the question of the Contractor's entitlement to payment depended solely upon a construction of the contract then the Employer's position, as set out above, must be accepted and the Contractor would not presently be entitled to payment.

The Contractor however contended that the statutory provisions of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 must be considered in conjunction with the contractual provisions. In particular sections 109,110 and 111.

The Contractor's argument based on those provisions of the Construction Act, was to the following effect. Clause 27 of the contract operated as a suspension of payment, until the balancing exercise provided for under that clause had been carried out. That was, in effect, providing for a scheme for withholding payment. The Employer had not issued a notice of intention to withhold payment of the sum in question, in accordance with the provisions of section 111. Accordingly the sum could not be withheld.

The Employer's response to this was to focus on the wording of Section 111 of the Construction Act. Section 111 provides, amongst other things, as follows:

"(1) A party to a construction contract may not withhold payment after the final date for payment of a sum due under the contract unless he has given an effective notice of intention to withhold payment ...".

The Employer contended that the critical words in section 111(1), for the purposes of the present dispute, were "the final date for payment of a sum due under the contract." It was submitted, by the Employer, that the statutory provisions left the parties free to determine, as a matter of contract, the final date for payment. In the present case, the parties had determined, by agreement, that even if a sum was due before a receiver was appointed to the Contractor then, if the contract could be determined by the Employer as a result of the appointment of the receiver, then the only sums remaining due and payable thereafter, were those provided for under Clause 27. The statutory provisions had not restricted the parties' freedom to contract to that effect.

The issue

The Contractor accepted that the sharp issue for the court to determine was whether, notwithstanding the provisions of section 111 of the 1996 Act, the parties, by virtue of the provisions of the contract, remain free to alter an agreed final date for payment of a sum certified to be payable under the terms of the contract, to another date, in the light of an insolvency event.

The decision

Lord Clarke decided in favour of the Employer and dismissed the Contractor's claim. Given that it had been accepted by the Contractor that the contractual provisions were clear and to the effect that the Employer need not pay the sums claimed, the clear question for the court was whether section 111 of the Construction Act subverts these contractual arrangements. Lord Clarke was satisfied that it did not. In his view Clause 111 was directed at cash flow questions during the course of a continuing construction contract, whereas Clause 27 is concerned with the situation where an Employer has legitimately determined the contract. In his Opinion the legislative provisions were not intended to regulate that situation:

"That situation is one for which the parties themselves have legislated and their freedom of contract in that respect has, in my judgment, not been affected by the legislative provisions. The parties' continuing freedom of contract is expressly recognised in section 109(2) and, even more importantly, for present purposes, in section 110(1) where it is provided as follows: "The parties are free to agree how long the period is to be between the date on which a sum became due and the final date for payment. Putting the matter another way, in the present case, the parties were free to agree that the original date for payment of sums due under the contract, could be altered in the event of the contract being determined so that "the final date for payment" of the sum in question, has not, by reason of the contractual provisions yet arrived."

Analysis and conclusion

Lord Clarke was clear that, in his judgment, all that Clause 27 of the contract did was to alter/postpone the final date for payment of the certified sum, however, the reality is that in the balancing exercise there will be a wholesale re-working of the sum due to the Contractor. To talk then of a postponement of the final date for payment may be seen as artificial.

Moreover it is difficult to reconcile this decision with the English Court of Appeal decision in Ferson Contractors Ltd v Levolux A.T. Ltd and the Scottish Inner House decision in The Construction Centre Group Limited v Highland Council. In Levolux, the Court of Appeal was asked to consider whether a provision in the subcontract stating that no further sums would be payable in the event of determination of Levolux's employment extended to cover payments due under an adjudicator's award. The court held that Levolux were entitled to payment, as decided by the adjudicator, notwithstanding the provisions of the contract and that if the provisions of the contract were in conflict with the Construction Act they would be struck down. Similarly in the Construction Centre Group case, the Inner House of the Court of Session held that a similar provision in the contract, to the effect that upon determination the Employer would not be liable to make any payment to the Contractor, would not result in a refusal to enforce a pre-existing adjudicator's award.

The distinction between these two cases and the present one is that in those cases an adjudicator had decided that sums were payable and ordered payment, whereas in the present case these is no adjudicator's decision but an undisputed debt which accrued before the insolvency event giving rise to the right to determine the contract.

The underlying rationale behind the Levolux and Construction Centre Group cases is that the contractual provisions must not circumvent and undermine the intention of Parliament as set down in the Construction Act, otherwise those contractual provisions will be struck down. Logically that rationale must apply equally to the payment provisions contained in s109 - 111 of the Act as it does to the Parliamentary intention that adjudicators awards be enforced. Section 111 (1) clearly expresses Parliament's intention that, "a party to a construction contract may not withhold payment after the final date for payment of a sum due under the contract unless he has given an effective notice of intention to withhold payment". To allow there to be a revised/postponed final date for payment, depending upon certain circumstances, would appear to run counter to that intention and circumvent that provision. In this case it should be remembered that Wimpey had no basis for refusing payment between 16 May and 22 May.

It is not yet clear whether the decision will be appealed. It may be that the decision will, in time, be seen to be limited to it's particular facts, namely determination upon the occurrence of an insolvency event, but given that the focus of Lord Clarke's reasoning is rooted in freedom of contract, could this reasoning be expanded? For example, could a provision be drafted to postpone a final date for payment in the event of latent defects materialising in the contractors works pending ascertainment of responsibility for those defects? Other examples can be envisaged.

The Construction Act undoubtedly impacted upon the principle of freedom of contract. It may be that contract draftsmen will seek to exploit the support espoused by Lord Clarke for the principle of freedom of contract at the expense of the principles underlying the Construction Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.