UK: The House Of Lords Wakes Up

Last Updated: 28 October 2004

After a decade of refusing to take any patent cases, the House of Lords took 2; Kirin Amgen v Hoechst Marion Rousell and SABAF v MFI. Judgment was handed down respectively on 21 October and 14 October 2004. The former is more important than the latter. In each case the judgment was unanimous, and the leading judgment was given by Lord Hoffman who was formerly a Patents Court Judge and has been involved as a barrister in IP cases, and is still actively involved in IP professional issues.

There Is No European Doctrine of Equivalents

The Court reviewed the decisions and writings of the leading judges in Germany and the Netherlands, and concluded that there is no room in the European Patent Convention and conformed national laws for a doctrine of equivalents. The message is quite clear; the claim means what is says and you cannot construe into the claim what is not there. The claim states what the patentee claims as his monopoly, and what is not claimed is disclaimed.

It is not permissible, and the Court observed this to be the normal position in the UK, Germany and the Netherlands, to look at the prosecution file, or to second guess what was in the mind of the draughtsman in his negotiations with the patent office.

The decision then set out the basis on which claims are to be construed having regard to Section 69 EPC and its Protocol. It held first how they are not to be construed; that is by taking the old English common law approach of narrow or forensic construction, or by taking the old continental European approach of the claims in which the claims were construed as point of departure in determining the inventive achievement disclosed by the specification as a whole.

Instead the Court said that claims are to be construed by reference to the words used, giving them the widest meaning they are reasonably capable of having, but no wider. They are to be given a purposive construction in accordance with the construction of all documents including statutes and contracts. Construction of a claim has to be viewed through the eyes of the skilled address. The question to be asked is what the claims mean to the skilled addressee.

Normally the answer will come back; exactly what they say, but there occasions, often but not exclusively where numerical or geometrical limits are used, where the claim means an approximation to those limits to the skilled reader. In the classic English case of Catnic Components which was about the interpretation of the vertical in a claim to the construction of a steel lintel for reinforcing door and window openings, that word was to be construed through the eyes of a builder or constructor and not through the eyes of a mathematician. The Court observed that most of the cases where strict language of the claims has not been observed relate to quasi mathematical limits, where the word "about" can be interpolated when construing how a man skilled in the art would construe the word or phrase.

Product by Process Claims

Under Article 64(2) EPC, embodied in English law as section 60(3) Patents Act 1977, it is an infringement to import a product made directly by the process claimed. The House of Lords said that product by process claims are unnecessary. If they claim only the product when made by the claimed process they add nothing to the process claim. If they seek to claim more widely than the process then the claim has to be examined for sufficiency to see if it is enabled by the specification. Product by process claims are only acceptable where the process makes a new product because it is some material way different from what was previously known. But where that is so the product is new and can and should be claimed as such.

A new process for a known product does not make the product as such new, only the process, and any product by process claim which is dressed up to claim the product as such will be bad for lack of novelty.

What Are the Lessons?

The Kirin Amgen case puts a premium on good patent drafting. It is better to have fewer patents of good width than more patents of narrow width. It is worth having some wide claims which might be held invalid but where the litigation process and the existence of the claims might be a deterrent to competition. Where the pendulum has swung is that claim drafting should now concentrate on two series of claims; a narrow series to the strict invention and a wider series, which might not survive protracted litigation to exploring the boundaries of litigation. What is clear across Europe is that the patentee which has drafted his or her claims too narrowly can no longer rely on the court coming to his rescue with the doctrine of equivalents, however dressed up.

This issue is particularly applicable to the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, where monopolies are sought to be extended by new processes of manufacture. If the product of the process is not new, then the process should be claimed widely as well as narrowly, and if the product is new, it should be claimed as such.

It is worth pointing out that only two claims were in issue in Kirin-Amgen; 19 and 26, and although they were both found invalid and not infringed, the rest of the patent (the narrow claims) survived. The effect of the litigation appears to have been to keep the defendant off the market until about two months before the patent expired, so even though invalid and not infringed, the wide claims had real practical commercial utility.

Mere Collection

The House of Lords also pronounced in SABAF on the issue of mere collocation. It held that where a claim contains integers which are themselves known and used for the purpose for which they are known and there is no claimed synergy from the combination, the claim will be invalid as being obvious. In the claim in that case, it was to a domestic stove burner with three known features which were put together for the first time. Each feature was performing the function for which it was known, and there was no synergy claimed between the features. This was held to be a mere collocation, and unpatentable.

Infringement by Importation

The House of Lords also examined the question as to when a person is an importer for the purpose of the statutes on infringement, Patents Act 1977 section 60(1). It held that this work has its common sense meaning; that is to say the person who brings the goods into the UK. It is a question of title and legal possession. The person who makes the arrangements to ship the goods is not the importer unless he or she also retains title when the goods enter the UK.

After a 10 year drought of cases from the English House of Lords on patent issues, there have been two important cases; the Kirin-Amgen case affects patenting strategy and litigation strategy, and needs to be considered as a seminal case. SABAF warns that if known integers are put together without some synergistic advantage, the patent is unlikely to survive an obviousness attack.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions