UK: Electronic Disclosure – Data, Data, Everywhere

Last Updated: 9 September 2004
Article by Matthew Lawson and Joseph Arazi

Desktop computers, laptops, personal digital assistants, mobile phones…these are just a few of the many sources of electronic data which are common place in today’s technologically advanced world. In this article we consider the impact that electronically generated data is having on disclosure in the course of commercial litigation, we review a party’s obligations and opportunities under the Civil Procedure Rules and we provide some practical tips to help ensure that obligations are met and that all opportunities are taken.

Impact of the E-Revolution

Long gone are the days when a party could comply with its disclosure obligations by merely undertaking a search for and disclosing hard-copy documents for inspection. The e-revolution has meant that electronically generated ’documents’ (such as e-mails, spreadsheets, presentations and word processing documents), and associated electronic data, are quickly becoming the primary focus of disclosure in litigation. This is perhaps not surprising when you consider that 97.3% of all documents created in 2000 were electronic, that in the same year there were an estimated 263 million e-mail boxes1 and that the total number of e-mail messages sent worldwide daily during 2002 was 31 billion, with this estimated to exceed 60 billion by 20062.

With electronic communication in the workplace now taken for granted, it is estimated that about 35% of business documents never exist in physical form and that percentage is likely to increase year on year3. Ironically, although electronic documents are often much easier to create and store, they are also often much more difficult to destroy – documents deleted from a computer’s "Recycle Bin" actually remain on the computer’s hard drive until overwritten, which may be never with the memory size of today’s machines. It is, therefore, possible for electronically generated (and potentially disclosable) documents to be retrieved long after they have been "deleted". However, this can be a very expensive process, as can searching for and reviewing the vast quantities of electronic ‘documents’ in order to discover the relevant ones.

It is also not just the electronic ‘documents’ and data referred to above which are potentially disclosable. Mobile telephones and personal digital assistants (particularly if used to send and receive e-mails and text messages as well as to store and edit documents and notes – think of Andrew Gilligan and the recent Hutton inquiry), as well as fax machines, all create and store electronic data which may become disclosable in litigation. Many businesses use networks and e-mail systems with central document and e-mail servers which create and store their own data.

Obligations Under the Civil Procedure Rules

With so much potentially disclosable, retrievable electronic information in existence, from so many sources, what are a party’s disclosure obligations in litigation? How far does a party have to go to retrieve, review and disclose this information? The normal disclosure order under the Civil Procedure Rules requires a party to give "standard disclosure" of documents which are or have been in its control and on which it relies, documents which adversely affect its own case and documents which adversely affect or support another party’s case. CPR 31.4 defines a "document" as "anything in which information of any description is recorded". In Derby –v- Weldon (No. 9) (1991), the Court concluded that the database of a computer, in so far as it contained information capable of being retrieved and converted into readable form, was a "document" and that the Court had power to order disclosure of what was in the database.

The application of this definition to electronic data raises a number of difficult issues. Electronic data can be broken down into four categories. These are known as "active data" (for example, the in-box and sent items in an e-mail system), "replicant data" (for example, a temporary copy of a file made when opening an e-mail attachment), "back-up data" (data generated and stored in case of a system failure) and "residual data" (essentially, data which is often mistakenly thought of as deleted). In addition, computers automatically create and store valuable data about a document, known as "metadata". This includes potentially interesting information tracking the origin and history of an electronic ‘document’, and those who have had access to or have changed it, which may be invisible on inspection of a paper print-out – for example, the "cc" and "bcc" on e-mails.

In appropriate cases, all of the above forms of data may yield relevant, disclosable ‘documents’. It is not clear from either the Civil Procedure Rules or case law precisely what lengths a party must go to in order to search for such documents and what constitutes a "reasonable" search. For example, is it sufficient for a party to limit its search to active data, which will usually be the most accessible and cost effective data to review and disclose? The reasonableness of any search will turn on the particular facts of each case, which must be considered in conjunction with the tests of proportionality which are set-out in CPR 31.7. This rule sets out the factors relevant in deciding the reasonableness of that search, including (a) the number of documents involved; (b) the nature and complexity of the proceedings; (c) the ease and expense of retrieval of any document; and (d) the significance of any document which is likely to be located during the search. This fits in with the overriding objective of the Civil Procedure Rules.

It is suggested that in practice, in relatively straightforward, routine cases, it may well be reasonable and proportionate to limit any search and disclosure to active data, although careful thought will still have to be given to where this data may reside – for example on the work or home PC’s or laptops of those involved in the matter giving rise to the claim, as well as information on any mobile telephones or PDAs. In more complex cases, especially involving suspected fraud or issues about the state or timing of knowledge of the individuals involved or the provenance of documents, it is easy to see that a wider search and disclosure may be required. In Zubulake -v- UBS Warburg LLC, a recent case in the US, the court provided guidelines for determining whether data should be treated as accessible or inaccessible and setout an analysis to help decide which information should be treated as inaccessible and which party should pay the cost of producing data deemed "inaccessible" according to principles of proportionality. One of the central issues in that case was how important the sought after evidence was in comparison to the cost of retrieval and production. We have yet to see whether the approach taken in this US case, where the court considered that the request for electronic disclosure may be unreasonable, but nevertheless ordered a search and disclosure whilst reserving the right to make that an expense of the requesting party, will be adopted in the UK. Such an approach would nevertheless appear to sit well with the principles enshrined by the overriding objective under the Civil Procedure Rules.

A further issue is what physically has to be produced for inspection. There is little authority on this issue. However, whilst the common practice of simply producing print-outs of disclosable e-mails may be a reasonable and proportionate method of providing inspection in a particular case, in more complex matters, including those involving fraud, this is likely to prove insufficient. It is arguable that the actual physical thing on which the information is recorded should be disclosed – for example, the hard disk, the laptop computer or the zip drive.

Practical Guidance

A working party has been set up by the Commercial Court to consider how electronic documents fit into the disclosure process. Some draft practice directions by interested groups have also begun to emerge. It is to be hoped that, as a result, further light will soon be shed on the matters discussed above.

Meanwhile, the issues surrounding the creation and disclosure of electronic data highlight the need for any individual, firm or organisation which may become involved in litigation to review their document retention policies and, if necessary, develop protocols dealing with the creation, storage and destruction of electronic data. This should help to ensure that they are prepared to deal early on with their obligations with regard to electronic disclosure in the event that a claim arises or is in contemplation. As with hard copy documents, this will include the obligation to locate and preserve potentially disclosable electronic data.

Once a claim is made (or is in contemplation), there are a number of steps which a party or those acting for them can take to deal appropriately with electronic disclosure, both in terms of getting their own disclosure in order and, if appropriate, being in a position to challenge the other side’s disclosure of electronic data. The following is a suggested checklist:

  • Discuss issues concerning electronic data with the other side at an early stage in the proceedings and attempt to agree at the outset on appropriate parameters for disclosure;
  • Raise the issue of preservation of data with the other side as early as possible in the proceedings;
  • Identify the sources of electronic data held which are potentially discloseable and the identity of the individuals involved in creation of that data. Such sources should include data which may be held outside of the office, on, for example, a home computer, laptop, PDA or mobile telephone;
  • Consider what is a "reasonable" search, with reference to the amount and sources of data involved, the potential importance of that data and the ease with which the data can be retrieved;
  • In complex matters, consider whether it is necessary to involve internal or external technical assistance to help with the process of locating, retrieving and reviewing (using key word searches etc.) potentially discloseable material. This could ultimately lead to a saving of both time and money;
  • Consider whether the documents disclosed by the other side tell the whole story and identify any gaps. For example, have emails of key personnel been omitted, have they adopted a selective approach in terms of dates of e-mails disclosed or attachments disclosed?;
  • Remember that sufficient information must be given in a disclosure statement about the search for documents (and any limits applied to it); and
  • Consider whether it is necessary to seek from the other side the production and inspection of the hard drive or other device on which their disclosed electronic data is stored. Is this a case where it is important to seek metadata? It may, for example, be crucial to know whether an e-mail was blind copied to a particular person.


1Statistics provided by The Gartner Group

2Statistics provided by research house IDC

3Statistic provided by Terry Harrison of Legal Document Management Limited

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions