UK: Restrictive Covenants - Passing Of The Benefit Of Restrictive Covenants To Successors-In-Title

Last Updated: 3 December 2013
Article by Emma Humphreys

89 Holland Park (Management) Ltd v Hicks [2013] EWHC 391


The First Claimant was the freehold owner of 89 Holland Park and the Second to Seventh Claimants were lessees of five of the six flats there. The Defendant was the owner of the land adjoining 89 Holland Park,

The freehold of No.89 and the land adjacent to No.89 were previously owned by R. In 1965, R conveyed the land adjacent to No.89 to F. The transfer contained certain restrictive covenants and these were then varied by a subsequent deed in 1968. The 1968 Deed referred to R as the 'Adjoining Owner' and F as the 'Building Owner' and contained the following clauses:

Clause 2(b) stated that the Building Owner would not make any applications in respect of any plans, drawings or specifications unless the application had previously been approved by the Adjoining Owner.

Clause 3 stated that no work would be started on the land until the plans, drawings and specifications of the buildings had been approved by the Adjoining Owner.

Clause 6 stated that "[t]he expressions 'Building Owner' and 'Adjoining Owner' shall where the context permits include their respective executors administrators and assigns".

The freehold of No.89 and of the adjoining land were subsequently conveyed to the First Claimant and the Defendant respectively. The Claimants sought declarations that they were entitled to the benefit of the covenants contained in the 1968 Deed which had been entered into by the predecessors of the First Claimant and the Defendant (as the Adjoining Owner and the Building Owner respectively).


1. Whether the Claimants were entitled to enforce the covenants in clauses 2(b) and 3 of the 1968 Deed.

2. Whether the covenant in clause 2(b) was binding on the Defendant.

3. If the covenants in clauses 2(b) and 3 were enforceable, whether they were subject to an implied proviso that the approval of the Adjoining Owner may not be withheld unreasonably.

4. Whether the Second to Seventh Claimants, as lessees of 89 Holland Park, were able to enforce clauses 2(b) and 3.


On the first issue, it was held that the benefit of the covenants in clauses 2(b) and 3 of the 1968 Deed passed to the successors-in-title and therefore to the First Claimant under s.78 LPA 1925. The Defendant had submitted that the terms of the 1968 Deed showed that the parties did not intend for the benefit of the covenants to pass to the successorsin- title of No. 89 without an express contractual assignment. It was therefore argued by the Defendant that the position was analogous to the case of Roake v Chadha1in which it was held that the effect of s.78 LPA 1925 could be displaced by evidence of contrary intention of the parties. However, it was held that in the reading of the 1965 Transfer and 1968 Deed together there were no clear indications that the parties intended for the benefit of the covenants to be prevented from passing with the land and therefore the parties' intentions were consistent with s.78 LPA 1925.

The Judge also rejected the Defendant's argument that it would have been commercially sensible for R to intend the benefit of the covenants to only pass by express assignment from him rather than with the land. The Judge distinguished the case from Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister2and Roake v Chadha, where the covenantee was selling off an estate plot by plot and therefore might wish to retain control over the land. In contrast, he stated where there is a straightforward sale of land by a vendor who retains the neighbouring land, the Judge felt it would be expected that the benefit of covenants would pass with the land.

It was further argued by the Defendant that the 1968 Deed did not sufficiently identify the land intended to be benefitted. The Judge also rejected this argument and held that the land was identifiable in accordance with s.78 of the Law of Property Act 1925 as interpreted by Crest Nicholson. The position of the other Claimants was considered in issue 4.

On the second issue, the Defendant argued that the covenant in clause 2(b) was not binding on the Defendant because it did not touch and concern the land of the Claimants. She also sought to argue that the covenant was not a restrictive covenant in any event. Regarding the first argument, it was held that the covenant touched and concerned the land of No.89 because it allowed the owners of No.89 to have some control over the adjoining land and the covenant was likely to affect the value of No.89 because of this control. The argument by the Defendant - that clause 2(b) was not a restrictive covenant because it did not affect the user of the Defendant's land – was also rejected. The Judge noted that, whilst the obtaining of planning permission does not itself involve doing anything on the land, the purpose of seeking planning permission is to carry out the development of the land. Therefore, any restriction on the obtaining of planning permission would be a restriction on the ability to develop land and would ultimately affect the use of the land.

On the third issue, it was held that it was necessary to imply a proviso in the 1968 Deed that approval or consent would not be withheld unreasonably in order to give business efficacy to the agreement and to give effect to the reasonable expectations of the parties as set out in the agreement as a whole. The Judge stressed that the whole purpose of the agreements was the development of the adjoining land and a specific process was set out for this in the 1968 Deed; it would therefore undermine the purpose of the agreements if the Adjoining Owner could withhold consent on a whim.

Finally, it was held that - although the Second to Seventh Claimants were not 'assigns' within the meaning of clause 6 of the 1968 Deed - they were able to enforce the covenants by virtue of s.78 LPA 1925. However, the relevant approval required under those covenants was from the First Claimant (being an 'assign' under clause 6). Accordingly, the issue was unlikely to be of practical significance as the First Claimant was a management company controlled by the Second to Seventh Claimants.


1 Roake & Ors v Chadha & Anr. [1983] 3 All ER 503

2 Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Emma Humphreys
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.