ARTICLE
14 October 2013

Court Can Appoint An Arbitrator In A Shipping Dispute Where There Is A Good Arguable Case

RS
Reed Smith (Worldwide)

Contributor

Reed Smith (Worldwide) logo
Reed Smith is a dynamic international law firm helping clients move their businesses forward. By delivering smart, creative legal services, we enrich clients' experiences with us and support achievement of their business goals. Our longstanding relationships and collaborative structure enable the speedy resolution of complex disputes, transactions, and regulatory matters.
In Five Oceans Salvage Consultants Ltd v Perla Navigation Ltd (unreported), the applicant applied for the court to appoint an arbitrator pursuant to section 18 Arbitration Act 1996.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Five Oceans Salvage Consultants Ltd v Perla Navigation Ltd (unreported), the applicant applied for the court to appoint an arbitrator pursuant to section 18 Arbitration Act 1996.

The applicant was the contractor under a Lloyd's standard form of salvage agreement, which incorporated the Lloyds standard salvage and arbitration clauses. The second and third respondents were the buyer and seller of the cargo. The former was an entity owned by the Iranian government.

The salvage and arbitration clauses contemplated the appointment of an arbitrator. Appointment would usually be made by the Council of Lloyd's, who declined to appoint due to concerns that the cargo (the subject of a sale to an entity owned by the Iranian government) might be subject to current sanctions in respect of the provision of material, logistical and financial support to Iranian entities.

The respondents did not object to the order sought. The issue was whether there was a good arguable case that the salvage agreement, and hence the arbitration agreement, was an agreement with the second or third respondent. The court could only appoint an arbitrator in such circumstances.

The court granted the application.

Neither the second respondent nor the cargo were on the lists of proscribed Iranian entities or goods. Although there was some uncertainty as to who the owner of the cargo was at the time the salvage agreement was entered into, there was a good arguable case in respect of either the second or third respondent being the owner of the cargo. As a result, it was appropriate for the court to appoint an arbitrator.

Comment

This case highlights the requirements in respect of evidence and proof where the court is asked to appoint an arbitrator under s.18 Arbitration Act 1996. It is simply necessary to show a good arguable case that the court should make the appointment. This allows for some uncertainty to remain. This is a logical position to take, as such uncertainties may only be resolved in the course of the subsequent arbitration proceedings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More