UK: Money Laundering – Clarification of the New Legal Obligations and Implications for the Solicitor-Client Relationship

Last Updated: 28 May 2004
Article by David Winch and David Corker

David Corker is a solicitor at Corker Binning, David Winch is a chartered accountant and director of Accounting Evidence Ltd and MLRO Support Ltd. Both are speakers at the Anti-Money Laundering Seminars being offered by Walkgrove Ltd.

Few solicitors will by now be unaware of the new law created by Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 which is concerned with money laundering. This legislation, implemented in February 2003, together with the Money Laundering Regulations 2003 effective from March 2004, have attracted a high degree of concern and uncertainty within the profession. Key issues are their impact upon the solicitor-client relationship and the extent to which privilege may abrogate or modify any reporting obligation imposed by the Act.

‘Money laundering’ offences need not involve either money (since they can apply to any asset including intangible assets and even cost savings) or laundering (since a criminal’s possession of the proceeds of his own crime now constitute a money laundering offence). Further, the substantive offences relate to the proceeds of all crimes, not simply serious crimes or certain types of offences, and the substantive money laundering offences can bite on any person, they are not limited to persons engaged in particular regulated business activities.

This article seeks to offer some further guidance and clarification as to the Act’s legal obligations. In addition, as it is particularly germane to solicitors, it considers the relationship between such obligations and the scope of privilege.

The legislation can be conveniently divided into three discrete issues as follows;-

The substantive laundering offences (Sections 327-329)

Where there is no intention to assist a client in the laundering of criminal property, the most wide-ranging offence which could be committed by a hapless legal advisor is where he/she "becomes concerned in an arrangement which he knows or suspects facilitates (by whatever means) the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property."

To commit this offence, an advisor need only suspect that property at issue is somehow derived from crime, but then the advisor does something which he knows or suspects assists money laundering by another. Crucially for solicitors, the giving of advice alone may be sufficient to amount to facilitation. By way of example, it is not necessary for the advice to be related to any ongoing transaction, or for money to pass through the solicitor’s client account. Furthermore, there is no de minimis threshold; if a solicitor is suspicious that a client has sought advice to help retain the proceeds of a small state benefit fraud, the solicitor’s position is the same as if the client was implicated in a major theft.

Taking the wide sweep of this offence into account it is necessary to focus attention on the concept of facilitation. This connotes some positive act amounting to assistance in the carrying out of one of the substantive laundering offences. For example, the giving of advice should be distinguished from the mere taking of instructions and/or elucidation as to a legal requirement that is very unlikely to equate to facilitation. In other words, the holding of a mere suspicion alone about a client without more, does not come within the scope of this offence.

If, however, the solicitor is suspicious that bona fide advice or services performed has been abused by the client in order to assist in a money laundering offence then he could himself commit the facilitation offence. The antidote is always to promptly report a situation to NCIS.

Similarly, Sections 327 and 329 criminalise (amongst other things) the acquisition, possession, use, conversion or transfer of criminal property. The solicitor is at risk of prosecution under these sections where he in any way handles criminal property belonging to a third party, such as his client. Again, the antidote is always to promptly report a situation to NCIS. By doing so, the solicitor is relieved of any liability in respect of the substantive laundering offences.

Confusion appears to linger as regards the application of legal privilege in this context. This can perhaps be easily dispelled. Privilege does not attach to circumstances where a solicitor suspects that he has facilitated or committed a laundering offence falling within Sections 327 – 329. So where this occurs, a report must be made concerning the circumstances giving rise to this suspicion. Issues concerning privilege are irrelevant to a solicitor at risk of committing any of the substantive laundering offences.

Similarly it is clear that these offences can be committed by a solicitor giving advice or performing services of any description. They are not restricted to categories of ‘relevant business’.

Failure to report (Section 330)

The obligation to report suspicion of laundering to NCIS has applied to financial institutions since 1994. Its ambit has since 1 March 2004 been extended to cover specified activities of the majority of solicitors so that in common with banks, solicitors, accountants and others are now under a reporting obligation whenever in the course of a business in the regulated sector information or other matter comes to them which causes them to know or suspect or have reasonable grounds to know or suspect an incident of laundering. Non-reporting has accordingly been criminalised.

A solicitor is acting "in the course of a business in the regulated sector" only when he is undertaking relevant business (see Schedule 9 paragraph 1 as amended by SI 3074 of 2003). This definition is important. A solicitor will be engaged in a business in the regulated sector interviewing a client concerning a conveyancing matter. He may instantly cease to be in such a business when interrupted by a telephone call from another client held at a Police Station, since legal advice to a client in such circumstances is not ‘relevant business’. He will then return to a business in the regulated sector when he puts the telephone down to continue his interview on the conveyancing matter.

However, in contrast to the substantive laundering offences, it is unnecessary for the solicitor to have any involvement in a matter, other than receiving information indicating its existence, before the duty to report may come into play and the possibility of prosecution for failure to do so.

The principal exception to the reporting obligation is information falling within S. 330(6)(b). If information in the possession of a "professional legal adviser" came to him in "privileged circumstances", then it need not be disclosed or reported. Indeed to disclose such information to the authorities would appear to be a breach of professional ethics.

However, the major problem concerning privilege is the limited scope afforded by the Act. Fundamentally only one type is recognised, namely legal advice but not litigation privilege. That the ambit of the former is significantly narrower than the latter was a point recently made plain by the Court of Appeal in Three Rivers D.C. v Bank of England (3/4/03). Legal advice privilege in contra-distinction to litigation privilege only applies to confidential communications between solicitor and client but specifically not to communications with the opposing party or his representatives.

Argument has raged over the extent and application of the privilege afforded by S. 330(6)(b).

Some commentators have said that the privilege in S. 330(6)(b) is in reality of no effect at all for a solicitor since it is restricted to the circumstances set out in subsection 10. It is said that where the solicitor is acting in such circumstances then he is not undertaking relevant business. Accordingly he would not fall within the scope of Section 330 in any event, rendering the privilege unnecessary.

Alternatively it has been argued that the privilege is entirely negated by subsection 11. However the similar wording of Section 333 (4), which relates to tipping off, has been held to refer to the intention of the lawyer rather than that of his client.

Yet another view is that the legal professional privilege in S. 330(6)(b) is not a statutory re-statement of common law privilege at all but is an entirely new legal animal – namely an exemption from the reporting requirement of Section 330. It is argued that the circumstances in which this new exemption applies are entirely new, as is the method by which it operates. Accordingly the meaning of the exemption should be derived from the words in Section 330 without reference to case law or common law concerning traditional legal privilege. Crucially, under this argument, the content of pre-existing documents could be exempt from disclosure by virtue of subsection 10(c).

Another argument surrounds the description of "professional legal adviser". Only a professional legal adviser is entitled to privilege, but this term was not defined in the Act. However Regulation 7(6) now indicates that "professional legal adviser" includes any person in whose hands information or other matter may come in "privileged circumstances".

So the exemption appears now to encompass the solicitor and unqualified staff in the solicitor’s office. But does it extend to a third party, such as an expert, to whom confidential instructions and supporting information may also be imparted? The position remains unclear.

This creates a very serious problem for the profession where recourse to third parties is otherwise desirable. In a tax investigation matter for example, where advice as to the client’s tax liabilities is sought from an accountant and, as part of this task, the accountant is fully appraised of the client’s instructions and examines documents and information received from the client, the accountant would then have to consider his own position and decide whether a report to NCIS was required of him.

Particular problems may beset the firm’s Money Laundering Reporting Officer.

Should an employee make a report to his MLRO, even where this was not strictly required on the grounds of privilege, the MLRO would have a duty under S. 331 to pass on the information to NCIS if he had reasonable grounds to know or suspect money laundering. There is no privilege exemption for the MLRO in S 331.

Fortunately there is one possible solution, namely the ‘reasonable excuse defence’ for not reporting. The defence is created by S. 330(6)(a). A similar relief for the MLRO is found in S. 331(6). However, this is uncharted territory.

Overlap of Section 330 and Sections 327 - 329

It seems likely that there will be some matters to which both S. 330 and S. 327 - 329 will apply where a solicitor is engaged in assisting a client which may amount to facilitating money laundering or handling criminal property and at the same time is receiving information in the course of relevant business which gives rise to a suspicion of money laundering. In such cases S. 330 will probably trigger disclosure earlier than S. 327 - 329, because the receipt of information will precede the facilitation or handling.

There will be other matters to which S. 328 will apply but S. 330 will not (such as facilitation where the solicitor's activity falls outside relevant business); and yet other matters to which S. 330 will apply but S. 328 will not (such as where the solicitor is engaged in relevant business and receives information suggestive of money laundering by his client or another in which the solicitor has no involvement).

Tipping off and prejudicing investigations (Sections 333 and 342)

The issue for solicitors thrown up by this offence is the extent to which they can inform their clients that a disclosure of suspicion, either about them or about some property in which they have an interest, has been made either internally to the firm’s MLRO or to NCIS. It is important to emphasise this point. In many instances where the provenance of property may be suspicious, there may be no suspicion about the client. The solicitor may just be expressing concern that if the innocent client comes into possession of the property at issue the solicitor, and possibly the client, may have assisted in a transfer of criminal property or in the facilitation offence.

For their part, in guidance issued thus far, NCIS concede that (except in furtherance of a criminal purpose) there is no restriction on a ‘professional legal adviser’ informing any person of their report if that disclosure is made in connection with legal proceedings (or contemplated legal proceedings). Further, disclosure to a client (or his representative) is permitted when in connection with the giving of legal advice to the client.

Subject to this, if a disclosure is made which is likely to prejudice a money laundering investigation then the solicitor may commit an offence under S. 333 or 342.

Even where disclosure is permitted by law, NCIS would prefer solicitors to voluntarily delay any disclosure of their report until the periods of seven working days and, where relevant, 31 calendar days referred to in S. 335 have elapsed. Where the solicitor feels unable to delay his disclosure NCIS request that he seek agreement with them as to the way forward and, failing agreement, applying to the Court for directions.

However, the obligations and ethical duties owed by a solicitor to a client are not to be solely determined by NCIS. The withholding of relevant information even for a short period might make the solicitor’s job impossible.

It has been suggested that it will usually be impossible for the solicitor to continue to act for a client about whom he has made a disclosure to NCIS in circumstances where he is not permitted by law to inform the client of his report.

It might also be argued that ceasing to act would itself present difficulties for the solicitor insofar as he may be unable to frankly explain the reasons for his action and the cessation itself might, on some interpretations of the law, amount to tipping off.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions