UK: Insurance And Reinsurance Weekly Update - 9 July 2013

Last Updated: 17 July 2013
Article by Nigel Brook

Welcome to the twenty-fifth edition of Clyde & Co's (Re)insurance and litigation caselaw weekly updates for 2013.

These updates are aimed at keeping you up to speed and informed of the latest developments in caselaw relevant to your practice.

This week's caselaw

Westshield Civil Engineering v Buckingham Group
A decision on when civil proceedings are "commenced" for the purpose of an ADR clause and tips on filling in the claim form.

UL v BK
A judge summarises freezing injunction principles.

Aeroflot Russian Airlines v Berezovsky
The Court of Appeal decides the proper approach to whether the parties have agreed a jurisdiction clause and an application to stay under the Arbitration Act.

Westshield Civil Engineering v Buckingham Group

When are civil proceedings "commenced" for purpose of an ADR clause/filling in the claim form

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2013/1825.html

The alternative dispute resolution clause in issue in this case provided that either party could refer a dispute to legal proceedings if dissatisfied with the adjudicator's decision and that "if no such proceedings are commenced within 28 days then the Adjudicator's Decision shall be final and binding on the parties". Two issues arose:

(1) Did the clause require the claim form to be issued or served in order to "commence" proceedings? Akenhead J held there could be no doubt that under the CPR legal proceedings are commenced when the claim form is issued and "the issue is at least usually signified by the impressing of the court stamp with a date on and usually follows the payment of the requisite fee".

Nor was there any requirement to read "commenced" as meaning "served" by giving the clause a commercial or purposive interpretation. The word "commenced" is a "relatively simple English word" and since the law governing the contract was English law, the parties must be taken to have known the position under that law. Very clear and express wording would have been needed to equate commencement with service of the claim form. Nor was it unfair that a party could "conceal" the fact that it had prevented a decision becoming binding by issuing a claim form but not serving it for up to 4 months.

(2) It was accepted by the judge that in the claim form, the "Brief details of claim" section had been concise. However, this was still sufficient to "refer the dispute to...legal proceedings". CPR r16.2 is not particularly prescriptive in requiring a claimant to contain a "concise statement of the nature of the claim". The brief details provided in the claim form here complied with that requirement (and the general relief which was claimed ("declaratory" and "equitable"), together with the "catch-all" of "such further or other relief as the Court thinks fit" was sufficient to specify the remedy which the claimant was seeking).

COMMENT: In Elvanite Full Circle v AMEC (see Weekly Update 21/13, the court was required to interpret the meaning of the "filing" of a claim. That case and this one therefore demonstrate the importance of the careful drafting of dispute resolution clauses to ensure they meet the intention of the parties.)

UL v BK

Summary of freezing injunction principles

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/1735.html

This case involved an application for a freezing injunction in divorce proceedings. Nevertheless, Mostyn J made some general comments about freezing orders (on the basis that the principles governing an application for a freezing order under section 37 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 do not differ materially from those for an application for a freezing order under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973). Some of the observations he made were as follows:

(1) Proof of intention by the respondent is required under the 1981 Act. An unjustified dealing with assets will supply prima facie proof of an intention to dissipate: "In my opinion if someone is doing something unjustified with his assets then it surely follows as night follows day that he must (in a non-innocent way) be intending to do so". However, holding assets in off-shore structures will not, of itself, amount to an unjustified dealing of assets.

(2) An applicant must adduce evidence of objective facts and not "mere expressions of anxiety or suspicion". It is also vitally important that an affidavit indicate the source for any matters of information and belief, especially if the application is made ex parte.

(3) Reference was made to the case of O'Farrell v O'Farrell (see Weekly Update 04/12) in which Tugendhat J said that he was "shocked at the volume of spurious ex parte applications that are made in the Queens Bench Division". Except in cases where it is essential that the respondent not be informed of the application, the applicant should notify the respondent, at least informally.

Aeroflot Russian Airlines v Berezovsky

Court of Appeal decides the proper approach to whether the parties have agreed a jurisdiction clause/application to stay under the Arbitration Act

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/784.html

The Court of Appeal decided a number of issues in this case, including the following:

(1) Article 23 of the new Lugano Convention provides that if the parties have agreed a jurisdiction clause, the courts of the country which is chosen shall have jurisdiction (Article 23 of Regulation 44/2001 contains similar wording). Here, the claimant argued that the contract containing the relevant jurisdiction clause was void. The Court of Appeal held that:

(a) As a matter of English law (since the courts here were deciding the issue), the burden of proof was on the defendant to prove the validity of the jurisdiction clause;

(b) The standard of proof which the defendant must demonstrate was "a good arguable case". In Bols Distilleries v Superior Yacht [2007], this was said to mean a party had "much the better argument" than the other side. The Court of Appeal said that the only point of "much" in this context was to emphasise that if the two arguments are equal, the test would not be satisfied.

(c) The validity of the jurisdiction clause must be determined by an autonomous European law regime (ie that laid down by the Court of Justice of the EU - formerly the ECJ) and not the putative applicable law of the contract in which the jurisdiction clause is found (here, Swiss law).

The Court of Appeal found that the doctrine of separability was uncontroversial under EU law. Here, it had not been shown that the jurisdiction clause itself had been entered into as a result of bad faith by the defendant and hence the defendant could rely on this clause.

(2) Section 9(4) of the Arbitration Act 1996 provides that the court shall grant a stay of legal proceedings "unless satisfied that the arbitration agreement is null and void..." One contract entered into by another defendant with the claimant was said to contain an arbitration agreement (the applicable law of which was Swiss law). The Court of Appeal held that, where a non-English law arbitration agreement is said to be null and void, the English court must find out what the applicable law says and then "decide the effect of that applicable law, by reference to the relevant facts and the English law concepts of "null and void"".

Recently, in Golden Ocean v Humpuss Intermoda (see Weekly Update 19/13), Popplewell J held that the court could order a trial of this issue (ie whether the arbitration agreement is null and void), but is not bound to do so. Here, the Court of Appeal agreed, Aikens LJ saying that "In theory I suppose the court could order that there be a trial of an issue to determine whether the arbitration agreement was "null and void" ...But if the evidence and possible findings going to the issue of whether the arbitration agreement is "null and void" ... also impinge on the substantive rights and obligations of the parties the court is unlikely to do so unless such a trial can be confined to "a relatively circumscribed area of "investigation". Otherwise, in such a case, where the court is satisfied of the existence of the arbitration agreement and that the matters in dispute are within its scope,...the right course for the court to take is to grant a stay under section 9(4) and let the arbitral tribunal get on with determining the dispute".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions