UK: International Arbitration Clause Trumps Local Court Proceedings

Last Updated: 12 July 2013
Article by David McElveney and Leighton Moon

A recent UK Supreme Court decision, Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC (Appellant) v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 35, may offer further protection for international arbitration. The decision supports the proposition that parties should be bound by their agreement to submit disputes to arbitration and may prevent parties pursuing claims through local courts.

The UK Supreme Court decision may offer parties a way to:

  • avoid local court proceedings where there is an arbitration agreement; and
  • resist enforcement of local court orders against assets held in the UK.

A party may be able to obtain an order for an "anti-suit injunction" from a UK court to stop the other party from continuing with local court proceedings - even if an arbitration has not started.

Why do parties use arbitration clauses?

The advantages of arbitration are well known.

Parties often prefer arbitration to litigation:

  • as arbitral awards are more easily enforced in countries covered by the New York Convention,
  • as arbitration can be more confidential than public court proceedings;
  • for perceived neutrality; and
  • to enable greater control over the composition and expertise of the arbitral tribunal compared to a local court (with whom an international party may have little experience).

Local court proceedings versus arbitration clauses

Arbitration agreements are protected under UAE Law. 

Article 203 of the UAE Civil Procedure Code1 provides that parties cannot bring court proceedings regarding a dispute that is covered by a valid arbitration clause.  If a party starts local court proceedings despite the dispute being the subject of an arbitration agreement, the other party can apply to have those proceedings stayed. 

If, however, the local court decides not to stay the proceedings, the parties will lose the benefit of the arbitration agreement.  The court may decide that the arbitration agreement should not be followed if it is poorly drafted and uncertain, the signatories to the arbitration agreement did not have the requisite authority, or the subject matter of the dispute cannot be arbitrated due to public policy.

There is little that can be done under UAE law and procedure to reverse the effects a decision not to stay proceedings. An aggrieved party may, however, be able to take steps in the courts of the jurisdiction that is the "seat" of the arbitration agreement. 

The recent UK Supreme Court decision of Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC (Appellant) v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 35 suggests that a party could avoid local court proceedings by obtaining an "anti-suit injunction" without even needing to commence arbitration. The Ust-Kamenogorsk decision is most relevant for arbitration agreements that nominate England2 as the seat of the arbitration, however, the reasoning may also be followed in other jurisdictions.  

Anti-suit injunctions can protect arbitration clauses

Anti-suit injunctions restrain a person or company from starting or pursuing proceedings outside of the jurisdiction issuing the injunction (i.e. England for Ust-Kamenogorsk). The injunction is directed against the person or company (rather than the foreign court) and a breach of an anti-suit injunction amounts to a contempt of court and could lead to a fine or even the arrest of an individual. Perhaps more importantly, the English courts can also refuse to recognise or enforce a UAE court order obtained in breach of an anti-suit injunction.

In Ust-Kamenogorsk, the UK Supreme Court upheld an anti-suit injunction issued against the appellant preventing it from continuing with court proceedings in Kazakhstan in relation to disputes arising from a hydroelectric plant concession agreement.  The concession agreement included an arbitration clause that required (certain) disputes to be resolved by way of ICC arbitration conducted in London.

Importantly, the UK Supreme Court found that it was not necessary for there to be arbitration proceedings on foot in order to grant the anti-suit injunction.  Indeed, it was not even necessary for there to be arbitration proceedings planned.  In the UAE context, this means that a party who is forced to accept the jurisdiction of a UAE court can immediately apply for an anti-suit injunction without having to expend time and costs of starting an arbitration.

The UK Supreme Court rejected an argument that, in accordance with the Arbitration Act, it was only permitted to grant anti-suit injunctions when there were arbitral proceedings underway.  Instead, the UK Supreme Court found that it had sufficient power to grant anti-suit injunctions pursuant to section 37 of the Senior Courts Act despite the lack of arbitral proceedings.  This section provides that an injunction could be granted "in all cases in which it appears to the court to be just and convenient to do so".

A what if....?

The terms of the anti-suit injunction in the Ust-Kamenogorsk case was that the party "cannot bring" and is "restrained from bringing... the claim the subject of the [foreign court proceedings], or any other claim arising out of or in connection with the Concession Agreement... otherwise than commencing arbitration proceedings".

This creates a potential issue.  What are the consequences if a party is prevented from commencing anything other than arbitration proceedings, but the arbitral tribunal then finds that it does not have jurisdiction?

Article 203(5) of the UAE Civil Procedure Code

As set out above, Article 203(5) of the UAE Civil Procedure Code states that court proceedings cannot be brought in relation to disputes covered by a valid arbitration agreement.  However, it goes on to say that an arbitration clause will be deemed null and void if a party starts court proceedings and the other party does not object at the very first hearing.  That is, the local court will seize itself of jurisdiction to hear the dispute and the parties will forever lose the right to arbitrate the dispute and the resulting benefits listed above.

In practise, the requirement to raise the objection at the first hearing is frequently overlooked in the flurry of activity that follows the commencement of proceedings.  This is particularly the case with international parties who are less familiar with UAE law and procedure.  Indeed, it is not uncommon for a party to start local court proceedings in the hope that the other party overlooks Article 203(5).

It is less clear whether a UK court will grant an anti-suit injunction when a local court has seized jurisdiction due to the applicant failing to apply for a stay at the first hearing as required by Article 203(5) than for other grounds.  A UK court has the discretion as to whether to issue an anti-suit injunction and will consider all relevant

circumstances when exercising that discretion.  Any delay in making the application is a relevant factor in a court deciding against issuing the injunction.  Similarly, a UK Court may consider that it is relevant that an applicant failed to make an application in the UAE courts at the first hearing as required by Article 203(5).

Applicability to EU jurisdictions

For completeness, it is noted that for court proceedings in EU courts, UK courts will not issue anti-suit injunctions due to the Brussels Regime3  Under this regime, a member state's court is bound to accept earlier decisions of another member state's court that it has jurisdiction.  It has been found that anti-suit injunctions preventing an EU court from hearing a dispute which may be covered by a UK based arbitration clause would be contrary to this regime4.

Practical consequences of obtaining an anti-suit injunction

As the anti-suit injunction is not made against the UAE court but rather the party, it will only be effective if the party is willing (or can be forced) to comply with its terms.  For this reason, it may be of limited use in some circumstances and against some parties.

The anti-suit injunction may be of more practical use in preventing enforcement against UK based assets of any local court order obtained in breach of the injunction.  This is because an English court may find that it would be contrary to public policy to enforce a UAE court order that was obtained in breach of an injunction.  This may offer significant protection for an entity who has a UAE business but whose main assets are based in the UK.


1 Brussels 1 Regulation [Regulation (EC) No 44/2001] and Lugano Convention 2007

2 Allianz SpA and Ors v West Tankers Inc. Case C-185/07; National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1397

3 Brussels 1 Regulation [Regulation (EC) No 44/2001] and Lugano Convention 2007

4 Allianz SpA and Ors v West Tankers Inc. Case C-185/07; National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1397 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

David McElveney
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Clyde & Co
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Clyde & Co
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions